Subject: RE: Excellent Mudcat parody From: The Borchester Echo Date: 29 Mar 09 - 08:58 AM Norman, you're quite right. I just have his name on the calendar. You've reminded me to turn West rather than East when I set off later on. Thanks. |
Subject: RE: Excellent Mudcat parody From: NormanD Date: 29 Mar 09 - 08:55 AM Diane E: "I hope not to experience too many Borfolk moments when Leon Rosselson comes to Walthamstow tonight." Walthamstow tonight? he must be a fast traveller. I'm sitting looking at a leaflet advertising him at The Tricycle Theatre (Kilburn) tonight at 7.30, along with Robb Johnson, Frankie Armstrong, etc. By the way, has anyone seen this? It's a funny parody of Mudcat although I think this thread is much more hilarious. |
Subject: RE: Excellent Mudcat parody From: The Borchester Echo Date: 29 Mar 09 - 08:49 AM Ruth Archer, who has wisely kept out of this moronic thread, woud be able (since she is acquainted) to advise you that I am not LYNDA SNELL (for that is how she is spelled). [Which information has nothing whatsoever to do with the topic. Had you dragged in the Grundys or the departed Tom Forrest, there might have been a teensy smidgeon of a point]. |
Subject: RE: Excellent Mudcat parody From: kendall Date: 29 Mar 09 - 08:48 AM Old Maine saying, "Brevity is the soul of wit." |
Subject: RE: Excellent Mudcat parody From: Gedi Date: 29 Mar 09 - 08:40 AM I'm new to this anagram thing. Ms Easby, If your not F.Ingnobody they surely you must be Linda Snell? I just love guessing games.... |
Subject: RE: Excellent Mudcat parody From: The Borchester Echo Date: 29 Mar 09 - 08:27 AM While I have decided that there's really not a pressing need to intrude telephonically on the good Mr Heath's Sunday merely to check on just how exactly his assessment of the current state of musbiz coincides with mine, it will surely be raised next time we're in contact. Sadly, the day when this ceases to be an issue is still far from dawning, though I hope not to experience too many Borfolk moments when Leon Rosselson comes to Walthamstow tonight. |
Subject: RE: Excellent Mudcat parody From: John MacKenzie Date: 29 Mar 09 - 06:34 AM Oooh |
Subject: RE: Excellent Mudcat parody From: GUEST,A ragman Date: 29 Mar 09 - 06:28 AM I am new to mudcat and am finding this all very interesting. As I say, I am new here and do not understand all of the conventions. For example – on the forum home page where it shows the number of postings to a thread some of the numbers have a "d" next to them. Does this mean that Diane Easby has contributed and are therefore to be avoided? ;-) |
Subject: RE: Excellent Mudcat parody From: The Borchester Echo Date: 29 Mar 09 - 06:21 AM Ooh, is this a new game? It's much better than anagrams. I've seen Anahata and Ralph in the same frame together. Likewise A and I have exchanged a word (and beer) or three on occasion. R might have been there too, though he might deny it. Many people might have spied me and L. Heath consorting quite openly in a public place. I've re-read my post of 0330 feline time and, though not monosyllabic, it is oh so very explanatory and (I think) rather good. Do try and get through it. Dictionaries are available. |
Subject: RE: Excellent Mudcat parody From: treewind Date: 29 Mar 09 - 06:08 AM Oops! lost my cookie! Found my cookie! A. |
Subject: RE: Excellent Mudcat parody From: Megan L Date: 29 Mar 09 - 05:57 AM Thoroughly enjoyed the parody but then I am a poor mortal who doesnt pretend to be more than they are and can take pleasure in gentle humour |
Subject: RE: Excellent Mudcat parody From: GUEST Date: 29 Mar 09 - 05:54 AM Now, now, children! (for the record I know Lawrence Heath, Ralphie and Diane and can assure any interested parties that they are all different people. I've even seen the latter two together. We're all friends really, I hope) I can't say if I've met Frank.... Love and peace to you all! Anahata |
Subject: RE: Excellent Mudcat parody From: The Borchester Echo Date: 29 Mar 09 - 05:49 AM . . . f'rinstance: the twickyperson is associated with a venue way out on London's western fringes (known somewhat improbably as The Cabbage Field or something) where I went a few times several years ago when I really, really wanted to see an artist. I moved to the other side of the capital and have never been since. Twicky puts about a rumour that I'm boycotting the place. I actually never think back on it, though I do recall it wasn't much worse than many another, though I qlearned rapidly to behave like a Borfolk audience and stick to the bar except when the guest was on. To put it ever more clearly and bluntly, venues shouldn't be like this. It shows disrespect to the music, to the artists who care about it, and to the audience. I've known Lawrence Heath (quite vaguely) for over 30 years. But I know very well what he does and I admire his patience and tenacity. I fear his Borfolk pisstaking has been far too gentle though as the dire scenario depicted is still all too prevalent and his cringeworthy characters still abound. Comes, presumably, of a literacy deficiency. |
Subject: RE: Excellent Mudcat parody From: The Borchester Echo Date: 29 Mar 09 - 05:35 AM That depends on whether you are equating L Heath's outlook with that of "Frank". If anyone is they must be terminally bonkers. |
Subject: RE: Excellent Mudcat parody From: GUEST,Ralphie Date: 29 Mar 09 - 05:29 AM Well. I know Mr Heath very well. And I am sure that his opinion would be diametrically opposite to that espoused by Diane. It's a joke......Either appreciate it or let it go. |
Subject: RE: Excellent Mudcat parody From: The Borchester Echo Date: 29 Mar 09 - 04:04 AM Those who know Lawrence Heath and who also know me are more than fully aware that we are not one and the same. For a start, he does infinitely more than I do in practical terms to try and redress the balance of ignorance in "f*lky never-never land". He's tireless and infinitely more patient than I am. I merely observe and comment. Because I can. For a start, I advise that twicky person to get back to hoeing his cabbages. |
Subject: RE: Excellent Mudcat parody From: evansakes Date: 29 Mar 09 - 03:51 AM blah blah blah faux cognoscenti blah blah blah. Oh, DO give it a rest, Frank. This gross caricature alter ego of yours parodying a neo-fundamentalist folkie has now been sussed by pretty much all and sundry. It will get to the point soon where it won't even be funny anymore... |
Subject: RE: Excellent Mudcat parody From: The Borchester Echo Date: 29 Mar 09 - 03:30 AM Mr Chadwick hasn't the faintest idea of that which I may or may not "approve", though had he actually read my previous contributions he might have had a slightly less muddled idea. "Vermin" is representative of the old-style country singer or perhaps a traveller, an entirely separate concept to the lazy, incompetent "floor singer" who's learned (or hasn't) his/her material off a recording. It's only by sheer accident that Vermin has been dragged into a revivalist "f*lk club". Like my grandfather, his music was an essential part of his life, not an add-on hobby. It's a slur to describe him as not a "professional" or "amateurish". He may or may not have been an "amateur", though, as he was clearly modelled on Fred Jordan, he would probably have been paid sometimes. And have you ever witnessed travellers (because that's about all that's left who still do this) performing their handed-down repertoires? I think not, or you wouldn't have the temerity to look down on them with such bourgeois sneering. They don't label their music "traditional", it's simply what they do because it's theirs. Nor would they ever dream of referring to themselves by the poncy term "source singer", beloved of the faux cognoscenti. The entirely artificial environment of a revivalist venue is a wholly different matter. It is a public place of entertainment in which representations of what used to be is re-enacted, or better still, reinterpreted and rearranged, for a paying audience. It is (or should be) a showcase where the uninitiated can get a glimpse into a bygone culture (because that world no longer exists and in many instances never did). The all-too-common practice of allowing incapable (or not yet proficient) people onstage in public to perform really badly serves to reinforce the perception out there among the "normals" that "f*lk" is a joke. That is what Borfolk lampoons again and again. Frank was trying (and lamentably failing) to do it better. It's been said over and over again (and not just by me) that the experience of bringing new people along to a club night has been a dreadful mistake of toe-curling embarrassment which has resulted only in turning them off the genre for life, having had all their prejudices confirmed. It's not (and never really has been) the way to go. Borfolk illustrates this and what's scary (and no longer all that funny) is that things are not changing - or at least not nearly quickly enough. |
Subject: RE: Excellent Mudcat parody From: Old Vermin Date: 28 Mar 09 - 05:42 PM Well, I shall take no notice of tha-at. I shall do what I damn' well want to. None of this arty-farty nonsense. |
Subject: RE: Excellent Mudcat parody From: Doug Chadwick Date: 28 Mar 09 - 05:39 PM Well for a start we have a right good time spendin' the whole night down the pub dancing and singing ...... but, surely, you wouldn't approve Diane? He wasn't a professional and shouldn't have been allowed to enjoy himself singing and dancing. His amateurish attempts to sing in public would have given a bad name to traditional music. DC |
Subject: RE: Excellent Mudcat parody From: The Borchester Echo Date: 28 Mar 09 - 04:40 PM Frank likes folk music Nah, course he doesn't or at least he hasn't time to decide whether he does or not because he has to do everything else himself. Vermin's got the right idea though. Introduced to Lola Farjunk, local collector and archivist, he says: "Ah, you're one of those bodies who find the lives of us old ones so fascinating you jot it all down while your own life passes you by. Do you rate me as a bloke 'oos company you enjoy or as a rare sighting of an endangered species, a butterfly in need of pinning?" Ms Farjun coughs and asks: "Could you tell me how your generation used to entertain yourselves of an evening?" Vermin: "Bloody worries me the way you use the past tense. Well for a start we have a right good time spendin' the whole night down the pub dancing and singing without ever feeling the urge to bloomin' well talk about folk music". (ex SR 15 Spring 1983) |
Subject: RE: Excellent Mudcat parody From: greg stephens Date: 28 Mar 09 - 04:28 PM Ever been sitting with a few mates having a quiet chat in a pub and some loud mouth comes in, sits at the table, monopolises the conversation and destroys the conviviality, so one by one you have slink away and go home? |
Subject: RE: Excellent Mudcat parody From: evansakes Date: 28 Mar 09 - 03:08 PM "And what makes you think they're not the same person?" Simply because F. Ingnobody LIKES folk music |
Subject: RE: Excellent Mudcat parody From: John MacKenzie Date: 28 Mar 09 - 02:59 PM So GEFF means, Good Enough For Frank, then? |
Subject: RE: Excellent Mudcat parody From: Rifleman (inactive) Date: 28 Mar 09 - 02:54 PM "Clearly a wicked conspiracy between Diane and F.Ingnobody" And what makes you think they're not the same person? *LOL* |
Subject: RE: Excellent Mudcat parody From: John MacKenzie Date: 28 Mar 09 - 02:43 PM Jeer Posh Off |
Subject: RE: Excellent Mudcat parody From: Cllr Date: 28 Mar 09 - 10:06 AM yes but look how meeting you effected them rllc |
Subject: RE: Excellent Mudcat parody From: Leadfingers Date: 28 Mar 09 - 10:02 AM Just as a matter of general interest and to confirm that they DO exist , I have personnaly met Captain Birdseye AND Ms Easby ! AND Lived to tell the tale ! |
Subject: RE: Excellent Mudcat parody From: Surreysinger Date: 28 Mar 09 - 09:43 AM DaveS ... LOL! |
Subject: RE: Excellent Mudcat parody From: Megan L Date: 28 Mar 09 - 08:44 AM Aw cum oan Gedi theres naebuddy kin push an envelope that far. |
Subject: RE: Excellent Mudcat parody From: Dave Sutherland Date: 28 Mar 09 - 08:42 AM Since I have not commented on this thread does it mean that I am saved? |
Subject: RE: Excellent Mudcat parody From: Gedi Date: 28 Mar 09 - 08:22 AM "This whole debate is a complete 'wind-up' and we've all been well and truly 'had'? It's astonishing that people would be able to take all those 'outraged' postings above seriously as it would be clinically impossible for any one individual to be so completely bereft of a sense of humour. Wouldn't it?" Couldn't have put it better myself TF. I think DE is really another 'creation' of F.Ingnobody just to see how far he can push the envelope. |
Subject: RE: Excellent Mudcat parody From: Doug Chadwick Date: 28 Mar 09 - 07:53 AM No, just wanted to record my words. CD |
Subject: RE: Excellent Mudcat parody From: John MacKenzie Date: 28 Mar 09 - 07:43 AM You feeling seedy Doug? |
Subject: RE: Excellent Mudcat parody From: SteveMansfield Date: 28 Mar 09 - 07:41 AM It's been a fantastic spectator sport, but I'm just a little disappointed that nobody from E-coli has joined in the scrap here. They (the e-ceilidh mailing list, dedicated to narrowing the definition of English ceilidh to as narrow a list of approved bands and callers as possible and looking contemptuously down on absolutely everybody else) are obviously targetted in the Mud-e-ceilidh name and logo as well. Presumably a three-line-whip has been issued, and all their horror and outrage has been limited to internal e-coli distribution only! |
Subject: RE: Excellent Mudcat parody From: Will Fly Date: 28 Mar 09 - 07:34 AM Hmmph! Not many anagrams available for my name. L.F. Willy |
Subject: RE: Excellent Mudcat parody From: evansakes Date: 28 Mar 09 - 07:23 AM This thread is just too funny for words. Clearly a wicked conspiracy between Diane and F.Ingnobody and they must both be creasing themselves now with every successive irate plea to 'lighten up', 'naff off' and 'get a life'. This whole debate is a complete 'wind-up' and we've all been well and truly 'had'? It's astonishing that people would be able to take all those 'outraged' postings above seriously as it would be clinically impossible for any one individual to be so completely bereft of a sense of humour. Wouldn't it? |
Subject: RE: Excellent Mudcat parody From: Surreysinger Date: 28 Mar 09 - 07:17 AM Now Connie Lied would work better for me... and I LOVE that title ... much better in each case than the original!!! As for Max - Mel "Six" Page ? of Mel A Pigsex ? |
Subject: RE: Excellent Mudcat parody From: GUEST,OK so I'm not F. Ingnobody Date: 28 Mar 09 - 07:05 AM S'pose you're right about not using all the letters, Surrey - but CONNIE LIED just doesn't have quite the same ring about it. And we never know whether Connie has been untruthful or that she specialises in German classical song. Maybe she and Jef Orfeo could get together and sing a duet of MY ONE ILL WARTHOG |
Subject: RE: Excellent Mudcat parody From: Doug Chadwick Date: 28 Mar 09 - 06:58 AM I normally sign off my posts as "DC" - not too many anagrams for that! CD |
Subject: RE: Excellent Mudcat parody From: Cllr Date: 28 Mar 09 - 06:49 AM hmmm lead fingers becomes deaf lingers |
Subject: RE: Excellent Mudcat parody From: Bonnie Shaljean Date: 28 Mar 09 - 06:48 AM Now it's our great illustrious leader's turn, who needs to either tell us what the D in his middle name stands for, or else risk going down in history for all time as LEX MAGPIES |
Subject: RE: Excellent Mudcat parody From: Howard Jones Date: 28 Mar 09 - 06:46 AM Ms Easby, the point is that you have made up your mind that this thread is about one thing, when everyone else has told you repeatedly that it's about something else. The points you are making may be perfectly valid, it's just that this thread isn't the place for them. There are plenty of other threads, past and present, to do that. |
Subject: RE: Excellent Mudcat parody From: Phil Edwards Date: 28 Mar 09 - 06:46 AM I used to post as "Lewd" Pip Radish, which is an anagram of... urhh... -toc- -toc- -toc- -toc- -badup, badup, badalabup! bong! Philip Edwards Oh, yeah. Never mind. |
Subject: RE: Excellent Mudcat parody From: Surreysinger Date: 28 Mar 09 - 06:40 AM Hey Caitlin and Frank Clone... you are both actually reading far more into my post than was there, as well ;-) No cages rattled, as such ...read those posts again and you'll see that I was just pointing out that that post wasn't actually from Frank/Lawrence - physically impossible as he was actually in the process of MC'ing the club at the time. I was mildly amused, and had to check the timings of the posts to be sure ! And Frank Clone,sorry, surely it's not an anagram if you haven't used all the letters ? The one thing we defintely are agreed on is that it would be good for this thread to revert to the cheerful state it was originally in! And Joe ... I could only come up with Jef Orfeo ...shame, could have done with another F ... but I suppose these days the spelling of names is variable. Great surname, though! |
Subject: RE: Excellent Mudcat parody From: Leadfingers Date: 28 Mar 09 - 06:06 AM And starts the journey Today ! |
Subject: RE: Excellent Mudcat parody From: John MacKenzie Date: 28 Mar 09 - 05:57 AM I love Diane's post ironic humour. With talent like that, she should go far. |
Subject: RE: Excellent Mudcat parody From: Haruo Date: 28 Mar 09 - 05:37 AM Yeah, that's pretty cool, but it wouldn't let me actually start a controversy (maybe because I tried to post as "ᏓᏆᏙᎥ ᏥᏤᎳᎵᏥ (dzidzəlalič)" and it couldn't spell it. Haruo |
Subject: RE: Excellent Mudcat parody From: Bonnie Shaljean Date: 28 Mar 09 - 05:26 AM Oreo - Yep, it could be a whole lot worse. The only other things I could think of were ROOF FEE, which left me with yet another J that I didn't know what to do with, or else O JEER OFF So count yourself lucky! Love, Anal Hen (no, you can't call me "Anal" for short...) |
Subject: RE: Excellent Mudcat parody From: GUEST,OK so I'm not F. Ingnobody Date: 28 Mar 09 - 04:23 AM Oh come on, the anagrams aren't THAT bad. Celine Dion is only missing her C, the song title its R, and I got my name right, didn't I? Anyway like Caitlin said, it was just a joke to try and lighten things up. (Too bad it didn't work for more than an hour.) Didn't mean to rattle yer cage. Move on now? |
Share Thread: |