Lyrics & Knowledge Personal Pages Record Shop Auction Links Radio & Media Kids Membership Help
The Mudcat Cafesj

Post to this Thread - Printer Friendly - Home
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] [30] [31] [32] [33] [34] [35]


What makes a new song a folk song?

Related threads:
So what is *Traditional* Folk Music? (411)
Still wondering what's folk these days? (161)
Folklore: What Is Folk? (156)
Traditional? (75)
New folk song (31) (closed)
What is a kid's song? (53)
What is a Folk Song? (292)
Who Defines 'Folk'???? (287)
Popfolk? (19)
What isn't folk (88)
Does Folk Exist? (709)
Definition of folk song (137)
Here comes that bloody horse - again! (23)
What is a traditional singer? (136)
Is the 1954 definition, open to improvement? (105)
Folklore: Folk, 1954 definition? (133)
'Folk.' OK...1954. What's 'country?' (17)
Folklore: Define English Trad Music (150)
What is Folk Music? This is... (120)
What is Zydeco? (74)
Traditional singer definition (360)
Is traditional song finished? (621)
1954 and All That - defining folk music (994)
BS: It ain't folk if ? (28)
No, really -- what IS NOT folk music? (176)
What defines a traditional song? (160) (closed)
Folklore: Are 'What is Folk?' Threads Finished? (79)
How did Folk Song start? (57)
Should folk songs be sung in folk clubs? (129)
What is The Tradition? (296) (closed)
What is Blues? (80)
What is filk? (47)
What makes it a Folk Song? (404)
Article in Guardian:folk songs & pop junk & racism (30)
Does any other music require a committee (152)
Folk Music Tradition, what is it? (29)
Trad Song (36)
What do you consider Folk? (113)
Definition of Acoustic Music (52)
definition of a ballad (197)
What is Folk? Is RAP the NEw Folk? (219)
Threads on the meaning of Folk (106)
Does it matter what music is called? (451)
What IS Folk Music? (132)
It isn't 'Folk', but what is it we do? (169)
Giving Talk on Folk Music (24)
What is Skiffle? (22)
Folklore: Folk, Pop, Trad or what? (19)
What is Folk? (subtitled Folk not Joke) (11)
Folklore: What are the Motives of the Re-definers? (124)
Is it really Folk? (105)
Folk Rush in Where Mudcat Fears To Go (10)
A new definition of Folk? (34)
What is Folk? IN SONG. (20)
New Input Into 'WHAT IS FOLK?' (7)
What Is More Insular Than Folk Music? (33)
What is Folk Rock? (39)
'What is folk?' and cultural differences (24)
What is a folk song, version 3.0 (32)
What is Muzak? (19)
What is a folk song? Version 2.0 (59)
FILK: what is it? (18)
What is a Folksinger? (51)
BS: What is folk music? (69) (closed)
What is improvisation ? (21)
What is a Grange Song? (26)


Musket 01 Oct 14 - 12:57 PM
GUEST,punkfolkrocker 01 Oct 14 - 12:57 PM
MGM·Lion 01 Oct 14 - 01:18 PM
MGM·Lion 01 Oct 14 - 01:25 PM
Jim Carroll 01 Oct 14 - 01:32 PM
Musket 01 Oct 14 - 03:07 PM
Jim Carroll 01 Oct 14 - 03:44 PM
Steve Gardham 01 Oct 14 - 05:01 PM
Steve Gardham 01 Oct 14 - 05:27 PM
GUEST,punkfolkrocker 01 Oct 14 - 07:09 PM
Big Al Whittle 01 Oct 14 - 07:29 PM
Jeri 01 Oct 14 - 08:01 PM
Jim Carroll 02 Oct 14 - 04:18 AM
Jim Carroll 02 Oct 14 - 05:22 AM
Musket 02 Oct 14 - 05:34 AM
Jim Carroll 02 Oct 14 - 05:56 AM
Bounty Hound 02 Oct 14 - 06:36 AM
Phil Edwards 02 Oct 14 - 07:31 AM
Big Al Whittle 02 Oct 14 - 08:30 AM
Musket 02 Oct 14 - 09:50 AM
Bounty Hound 02 Oct 14 - 10:22 AM
GUEST,Punkfolkrocker 02 Oct 14 - 10:43 AM
Bounty Hound 02 Oct 14 - 10:58 AM
GUEST,punkfolkrocker 02 Oct 14 - 11:09 AM
Jim Carroll 02 Oct 14 - 11:11 AM
Phil Edwards 02 Oct 14 - 11:28 AM
Jack Blandiver 02 Oct 14 - 11:46 AM
Musket 02 Oct 14 - 11:48 AM
The Sandman 02 Oct 14 - 12:08 PM
GUEST,Spleen Cringe 02 Oct 14 - 12:31 PM
Jim Carroll 02 Oct 14 - 01:12 PM
Musket 02 Oct 14 - 02:16 PM
Jim Carroll 02 Oct 14 - 03:12 PM
The Sandman 02 Oct 14 - 04:02 PM
Phil Edwards 02 Oct 14 - 05:43 PM
Big Al Whittle 02 Oct 14 - 07:50 PM
GUEST,punkfolkrocker 02 Oct 14 - 08:08 PM
GUEST,punkfolkrocker 02 Oct 14 - 08:18 PM
Jim Carroll 03 Oct 14 - 03:41 AM
Musket 03 Oct 14 - 03:47 AM
GUEST,Howard Jones 03 Oct 14 - 04:27 AM
Bounty Hound 03 Oct 14 - 05:33 AM
Big Al Whittle 03 Oct 14 - 05:37 AM
GUEST,Colin 03 Oct 14 - 06:11 AM
Musket 03 Oct 14 - 06:11 AM
Jack Blandiver 03 Oct 14 - 06:29 AM
Bounty Hound 03 Oct 14 - 07:04 AM
Jack Blandiver 03 Oct 14 - 07:13 AM
Jim Carroll 03 Oct 14 - 07:21 AM
GUEST 03 Oct 14 - 07:42 AM
Share Thread
more
Lyrics & Knowledge Search [Advanced]
DT  Forum Child
Sort (Forum) by:relevance date
DT Lyrics:













Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: Musket
Date: 01 Oct 14 - 12:57 PM

Dave Burland called it a folk song not long after it came out, and sang it at clubs and festivals, showing it was living folk, describing a tragic event for posterity. He described what made folk. Geldoff of course, being an Irish pub singer prior to getting into punk.

The other is a nice song about shagging that my dear late friend Wellsie used to sing.

Most songs are copyrighted, you prat. Your hero used to drag tunes and even sections of words into songs that he then copyrighted. Peggy Seeger's new album I just bought is copyrighted..

Are you saying that lack of copyright makes something a folk song??? Ha! Ha!

Bugger off back to Dublin. You obviously haven't heard enough poor versions of Galway Girl drifting out through the pub door...

Anyway, it's academic. Folk is a music genre, recognised as such by millions and journalists are comfortable with the notion when reviewing.

In Acoustic Guitar this month, Peggy Seeger and Jake Bugg are both listed as folk. Neither singing traditional songs. Live with it.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: GUEST,punkfolkrocker
Date: 01 Oct 14 - 12:57 PM

...never did like Springsteen wannabe Geldof...

Here's a proper punk rock classic - repurposed for 'folk'
by one of the MacColls, no less....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b7aVZ3BHp3k

"Darling, let's have another baby - Johnny Moped

Darling, let's have another baby
Let's make one soon on our second honeymoon
Darling, I need you to be near me
To kiss and to touch, I love you very much
Darling, if you ever leave me
I'll cry a million tears
I'll go to the nearest boozer
And drink ten pints of beer

Darling, let's have another baby
Let's make one soon on our second honeymoon
Darling, I need you to be near me
To kiss and to touch, I love you very much
Darling, if you ever leave me
I'll cry a million tears
I'll go to the nearest boozer
And drink ten pints of beer

Darling, let's have another baby
Let's make one soon on our second honeymoon
Darling, when we have our baby
I'll be quite happy to wash and change its nappy
Darling, oh
Darling, oh
Darling, oh
Darling, oh"


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: MGM·Lion
Date: 01 Oct 14 - 01:18 PM

Still and all --- What makes you think that your getting all het up and emphatic and strenuosuly assertive makes them folksongs, Ian,

when they are not?

Not just on your shrieking hysterical say·so anyhow.

So -- how about

YOU live with it

????


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: MGM·Lion
Date: 01 Oct 14 - 01:25 PM

... not even if so miscalled in that universally revered and recognised and unquestionably authoritative journal of record -------

Wait for it .... Wait for it

ACOUSTIC MUSIC!

Wowzer!


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 01 Oct 14 - 01:32 PM

"Dave Burland called it a folk song not long after it came out
]Oh well - Dave Burland - that settles it then!
Any more for the Skylark?
"Most songs are copyrighted, you prat"
Folk songs aren't - you pratt - they are in the public domain


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: Musket
Date: 01 Oct 14 - 03:07 PM

Millions of people worldwide have a fair idea of what folk is. A few pseuds think it is the exclusive property of a bunch of idealist academics in The UK in 1954.

Not getting het up about anything. Just pissing myself that you think folk is limited to tit trousers and his acolytes.

I know what folk is. It's a genre of music amongst other things. As recognised by the thousands I mingled with at Cambridge etc. By the millions of albums released as folk, by the myriad concerts by folk acts around the world and the many folk song writers we love and cherish in folk clubs.

And that's where I'm off to. My set is one trad, one Harding, one Thompson and two of my own.

That's all folk!

😹😹😹


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 01 Oct 14 - 03:44 PM

"Millions of people worldwide have a fair idea of what folk is"
Well give us trheir definition - you haven't given us anything other than a folk song is any song I choose to call one
"A few pseuds think it is the exclusive property of a bunch of idealist academics"
And a few knuckle-dragging morons can't tell the difference between a song made, remade and passed on by ordinary (whatever that means) people for may centuries and a meaningless money-spinner made and owned by a millionaire musician who would sue the arse off you if you attempted to claim his song to be anything but that - his song.
Far from being an idealist academic, I'm a retired electrical who has spent most of his life, singing listening to, recording and attempting to pass on the songs and information on them because I believe the people who made and passed them down are worth far more respect than people like you and your contempt are willing to give them.
Your areguments haven't got any more logical or any more honest over the last few days.
You are still the bullying, blustering thug you were when I left.
Re Peter Bellamy
I was never a great admirer of his singing, but he had my undying respect for what he did for folksong (not sure how grateful Muskie the Moron is at his helping yet another "tit-trouesrs" in the form of Walter Pardon onto the folk scene - just another crumbly to buy a pint for and introduce to the 'Hits of Fairport')
I wa also impressed by his self-critical frankness when, at a Pardon/Bellamy concert at CSH, he described his own singing as "Larry-the-Lamb impression"
Jim Carroll


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: Steve Gardham
Date: 01 Oct 14 - 05:01 PM

Okay Jim, we'll give you a hard and fast definition of folk when you can give us a hard and fast definition of Country, Classical, Jazz, Blues, Rock, Pop, Disco, Punk..... er that'll do for now.

54 is indeed a definition, though even that has holes in it and can overlap with other genres.

Genres can't have hard and fast definitions as they tend to overlap with each other.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: Steve Gardham
Date: 01 Oct 14 - 05:27 PM

The above criticisms of Peter are really irrelevant (IMO). Whatever else Peter was he was an entertainer and even on the folk scene which essentially is part of the entertainment industry many entertainers, quite rightly IMO, find they become more memorable by adopting some form of, shall we say, affectation/eccentricity in order to stand out from the crowd. (MacColl & Lloyd were masters of this). I have nothing but respect for his work and music. I was also greatly shocked and saddened by his death having just got to know him. Everyone is entitled to have an opinion of his performance style and, love it or hate it, no-one can deny his great contribution to the music.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: GUEST,punkfolkrocker
Date: 01 Oct 14 - 07:09 PM

Surrounded by 21st Century corporate popular music culture for the masses;
gotta keep our own specialist biases in perspective....

For most young and new UK listeners and performers,
'Trad' is not the default starting point for entry into 'Folk'.

'Trad' is a small marginal, almost alien, area of interest within the broader folk music genre.
A genre where even bands as unlikely as R.E.M & The White Stripes
can be claimed by journalists to be on occasions 'folk' .

'Trad' requires new entrants to actively make the effort to seek it out and voluntarily opt in....

Yes there are still 'Trad folk families' passing it on to their offspring.
Some may argue they are predominantly midddle class
and almost as insular and preserved in aspic as the Amish and Mennonites...

Not knocking them, hats of to 'em..
but doesn't 'Trad' need fresh blood and more dynamic social diversity...???

Yeah, we all moan the mainstream music biz is nothing but transient marketing, PR, and hype...

But it wouldn't hurt to try and make Trad look just a little bit more appealing and less intimidating
to any newbies who might be making tentative first steps to check out mudcat for info and encouragement....????????


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: Big Al Whittle
Date: 01 Oct 14 - 07:29 PM

Jim - its you who is full of bluster, and you know it. You have not addressed anyone's concerns. Musket's a thug. I'm a dishonest clown and a moron.

theres a wonderful obituary in the times today for Pete Shutler. I never asked Pete his definition of folk music. he was a shining example to us all - he just got on with it, and his achievements were extraordinary.

i think that is what we all need to do - just get on with it to our best lights. when the conversation is such that it produces abuse - then the company obviously lacks the skill to debate sensibly.

lets just, get on with it.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: Jeri
Date: 01 Oct 14 - 08:01 PM

I wonder whether the people who've been part of a tradition, who grew up with it and learned songs that were passed down through the years in their families and home places, ever cared about labels.

I do agree "folk" us mostly a marketing tool, a label for people to know what bins music should be (probably) found in. Labels help with communication. Outside of that, pedants and those concerned with obsessively categorizing things use them to try to make the fuzzy, fluid world fit into their concrete definitions. This activity has no chance of ever succeeding, and leads to constant arguments having no chance of resolving. While these are incredibly frustrating to who believe all arguments should end with some agreed upon conclusion, that's not going to happen.

If you really think about it, definitions don't matter much. The music will happen, and let's hope academicians, pedants, and obsessive categorizers are ignored by those making music.

If there's one thing that most makes me want to stay away from some folkies or groups of folkies, it's the sneering. It's the people who use the term "snigger-snogwriter", or say "it's nice, but it's not what I like because it isn't traditional", or "horse alert". The more I read these futile but fervent attempts to lay down the law and ridicule those with differing ideas, the more I realize that it's all just music. It might be traditional, and it might not, but every song that is not traditional is capable of becoming so. Individuals don't really affect what happens with a certain song--it's more about the song itself and whether enough people like it to adopt it. Sure, the obsessive categorizers, sneerers, ridiculers, and wannabe rulers of the folk universe don't like the fact they don't have any control over the whole process of of a song being adopted and becoming traditional, but they don't.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 02 Oct 14 - 04:18 AM

"You have not addressed anyone's concerns"
Then you have only been listening to what you want to hear Al
I've told you what I believe folk song to be and how important I think it is.
You have refused to address any of those points - instead, you have attempted to justify jettisoning folk song and replacing it with pop music in the clubs.
Steve
Why on earth should I gave a definition of any of those - they only interest me in this discussion inasmuch as they are not folk song
Hard-and fast is a loadaed term - I never thought I would have heard it come from someone who claims to be interested in folk song research - thats what we do - try o understand and pass on the music we choose to work with.
And yes - the doold singers did differentiate - they may have used different terms to decribe teir songs, but whenever we questions, they made it quire clear that they rgarded them differently - not necessarily better or worse - just different
I get a little tired having to repeat this - would someone like to challenge it and I'll be happy to reiterate what we recorded - along with big transcribed chunks of it
It seems our older singers were streets ahead of some of our researchers on this matter
Jim Carroll


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 02 Oct 14 - 05:22 AM

Bit more time now
What distinguishes folk music from any other form is that it was almost certainly made by one social group (class) of people to capture and describe their lives and emotion - that is why it, along with dance, tales, music, lore.... was given its name - folk.
This has been a recognised factor since the term 'folk' was thought up in the 1830s.
The only way you can change or reject that definition or any replacement to it which includes that fact, is to dispossess ordinary people of their cultural heritage
Throuhout my time in Folk Music ther have been those who claim that 'the folk' were not capable of creating great works of art, such as the ballads - nw that seems to have filtered down to folk song in general.
I personally find it insulting to suggest that folk song was largely the product of a group on anonymous, notoriously bad poets (hacks) the bulk of whose output was unsingable and unmemorable.
I know folk song to be much better than that
jim Carroll


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: Musket
Date: 02 Oct 14 - 05:34 AM

"If it can be copyrighted it isn't folk."

If that's be best you can come up with Jim, why have you spent the best part of your life engrossed in a subject you have no clue about?

Traditional songs are a part of folk. They are a small subset in fact. Some nice songs, some needing burying and not sustained for sustaining sake other than a reference library, but folk is what millions of people recognise it as.

And that includes folk songs written since copyright was invented

💤


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 02 Oct 14 - 05:56 AM

""If it can be copyrighted it isn't folk."
You'll have to remind me where I actually said this - it doesn't seem to be here on this thread.
Even if it is something I said, it certainly isn't "the best" I have come up with
You have had masses of statements by me regarding origins, being remade, claimed... by a specific group of people, what traditional singers have had to say in comparing their songs to other forms.... absolute masses - you have chosen to ignore every single statement and have, in turn insulted the people who made and passed on the songs and anybody who disagrees with you - you continue to do so
If that's the best you can come up with......
How about backing up your dogmatic and unqualified statements with facts for a change - you might start by showing how 'I don't Like Mondays' could possibly be a folk song - in origin or in form, alongside some names of people who claim it as such (alongside their evidence, of course)
Jim Carroll


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: Bounty Hound
Date: 02 Oct 14 - 06:36 AM

'Traditional songs are a part of folk. They are a small subset in fact.

Actually Musket, I hear a lot of traditional music in this part of the world and on my travels, so I'm not convinced that it is a 'small subset' and more importantly, whether you like the tradition or not, it is the roots of it all. Without the tradition, there would be no new 'folk' music, so we should at least show a respect for the tradition, and as I said earlier, for those that wish to maintain it.

John


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: Phil Edwards
Date: 02 Oct 14 - 07:31 AM

Just out of interest, did Bellamy refer to his Kipling settings - or the non-trad bits of the Maritime England Suite, i.e. most of it - as 'folk'?

It seems to me that "Tommy" or "Follow me 'ome" or "Oak, ash and thorn" would be instantly welcomed in most English folk clubs - they'd be recognised straight away as The Kind Of Thing We Do; "folk club standards" as I've called them, or "folk" in Howard's terms (as distinct from "folk songs"). But did the guy who wrote them think, in doing it, that he was committing folk?


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: Big Al Whittle
Date: 02 Oct 14 - 08:30 AM

well if it wasn't unsingable and unmemorable - why in god's name are you making such a song and dance about the few people who sing and remember your favourite songs. surely, we'd all be singing it all the time.

nice post, Jeri. almost my own thoughts.

and folk music is all from the one class now, is it? well I'd agree with you on that point - it all stems from creative and imaginative artists. but those old songs....who knows, perhaps Henry VIII really did write Green sleeves. I doubt it somehow, someone who thought the only way to settle disagreements was by chopping peoples heads off.

well its not very imaginative....


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: Musket
Date: 02 Oct 14 - 09:50 AM

I don't know how many countries there are on the world and how many of them have multiple communities, but Bountyhound hasn't heard more than 0.00000000001% of the songs that even just make up traditional song, let alone folk song in the genre.

Jim. I take it you disagree with the fool who said a few posts up that folk songs aren't copyrighted but are in the public domain then? I know you disagree with everything anyone says but at least defend your own posts, you dozy bugger.

This narrowness that folk can only be a narrow class of oral tradition regardless of what it sings about is exceedingly disrespectful to what the vast majority call folk. They are talking about a subset called traditional folk, and then go as far as suggesting it only refers to poor people.

That's the problem with elitist attitudes. You need people to patronise and speak about in a condescending manner, in the tradition of Sharp, Vaughan Williams and Britten.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: Bounty Hound
Date: 02 Oct 14 - 10:22 AM

'I don't know how many countries there are on the world and how many of them have multiple communities, but Bountyhound hasn't heard more than 0.00000000001% of the songs that even just make up traditional song, let alone folk song in the genre.

Well if you take the world as a whole, then that may well be a true statement, but I was assuming we are talking UK here, and I'm sure you are really bright enough to have worked that one out!

Now you've just told Jim to defend his own posts, and this response to my challenging your assertion that traditional is a small subset is a rather weak response to that challenge. Whilst I agree that traditional is a subset of the wider genre, and I'm very comfortable calling something written yesterday 'folk', to repeat what I said earlier, from my experience I'm not convinced that it is a 'small subset' and more importantly, whether you like the tradition or not, it is the roots of it all. Without the tradition, there would be no new 'folk' music.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: GUEST,Punkfolkrocker
Date: 02 Oct 14 - 10:43 AM

How many Trad songs do the Mumfords do... ?

But it's quite probable that at least a small minority of their teen fans
may develop an interest to explore deeper below the surface of 'pop folk',
and eventually find a liking for other bands and artists who do include 'trad' in their repertoire...

That could be their point of entry, the gateway to, amongst other things, coming here to mudcat...

I pity those few poor innocent teens who must then encounter all this relentless hostility
and petty feuding...

That'd severely fuck anyones enthusiasm to dig deeper into 'trad'....


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: Bounty Hound
Date: 02 Oct 14 - 10:58 AM

'How many Trad songs do the Mumfords do... ?'

I guess from that comment that you are thinking trad is a small subset in terms of audience numbers then PFR, I was thinking more in terms of number of songs and number of performers out there..... and also in terms of influence, after all, without the tradition, the style of music the Mumfords do would not exist!

So, what we now need is a definition of 'Small' ;)

John


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: GUEST,punkfolkrocker
Date: 02 Oct 14 - 11:09 AM

Yeah.. I'm no statistician or market demographics researcher...


But I fairly confidently believe that significant voluntary active participation in trad folk amongst UK teens,
may be comporable to or lower than
trainspotting, car number plate listing, and butterfly and bird egg collecting.....???


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 02 Oct 14 - 11:11 AM

"I know you disagree with everything anyone says but at least defend your own posts, you dozy bugger."
Defend what Muskie?
Folk songs are in the public domain - what's wrong with that statement - what's to defend?
Copyrighting a song is tantamount to signing it as belonging to an individual and not in the public domain - any problem with that?
'I don't like Mondays' is the property of an extremely wealthy individual who would probably break your fingers in the lavatory door if you tried to claim it as being anybody's but his.
What on earth's your problem Muskie, "you dozy bugger"?
You still have failed to address one single point I have made but are blustering and bullying, as is your wont.
How about justifying some of your own inanities instead of declaring them as if they made sense dickhead?
"whether you like the tradition or not, it is the roots of it all."
This is what is either forgot ton in all this or has been deliberately shelved so 'folk' can be used as a catchall dustbin.
Jim Carroll


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: Phil Edwards
Date: 02 Oct 14 - 11:28 AM

OK, here's another angle.

Is folk the music of the people?

Al and Jack B both seem to think that it is, as long as you don't define folk as 'traditional'. English traditional songs are the property of a small number of enthusiasts and have nothing to do with the people in general, and this is a bad thing.

Jim, I think, believes that traditional folk songs were the music of the people and that new songs 'in the tradition' could be again - but that this isn't happening very much now.

Personally I think that (traditional) folk songs were the music of the people at one time, but that time is long gone. Like Al, I think that traditional songs are the property of a small number of enthusiasts and have nothing to do with the people in general. Unlike Al, I'm not bothered - everything else that I'm into is a minority taste, why should folk be any different?

(As for Musket, he just keeps repeating "folk is folk is folk" - and he gets angry if you disturb him, so I say we leave him to it.)


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: Jack Blandiver
Date: 02 Oct 14 - 11:46 AM

Just out of interest, did Bellamy refer to his Kipling settings - or the non-trad bits of the Maritime England Suite, i.e. most of it - as 'folk'?

In the VHS interview (linked to on the BBOT thread) he says Kipling's poems were inspired by Folk Song; likewise his setting of same, which elsewhere he calls of a 'traditional idiom'. He put a lot go his energies into this Creative Idiomatic Folk composition over the years, so one might infer that he saw such things as Folk in a Revival Sense, if not an actual sense, but paid exacting homage to the traditions he revered in tyne process. He wasn't above 'improving' on old songs, such as his melody for '98, or his switch from using E Trad melodies for his Kipling settings, to those of his composition within that idiom. Naturally, his own were miles better, though following this thesis I did once drop Puck's Song into the Morris tune of Idbury Hill (London Pride) and it fit like a glove. But Bellamy's is better - for that song anyway. I guess that's the hauntological essence of the Zeitgeist he was acting as medium to; Shamanic in his creative genius he tapped into something very rich indeed - Kipling likewise I'd say, but that's a discussion for another day!


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: Musket
Date: 02 Oct 14 - 11:48 AM

I don't get angry, I just say that it is stupid to say traditional is the only folk. The vast majority of people who associate their tastes in folk piss themselves laughing when a weirdbeard rattles on like that.

There are clearly many subsets and flavours within the genre. The more someone says I must hate folk and that I go goosestepping, the more I see why folk clubs have morphed into clubs where you don't mention folk any more due to self righteous attitudes of morons who think they and not the world own a word.

If Jim is right, then folk died years ago. If I'm right, it is a living musical genre which, in case the blinkered old men haven't realised, is the basis of a huge revival in The UK with many excellent and exciting artistes. All happy to be called folk.

Traditional is A folk, and never has been THE folk. A bit insulting to most folk music, don't you think, dismissing the majority of UK folk over the years as not folk? Saying an old bloke croaking a song he claims his mother taught him is folk but Vin Garbutt isn't?

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: The Sandman
Date: 02 Oct 14 - 12:08 PM

I wonder whether the people who've been part of a tradition, who grew up with it and learned songs that were passed down through the years in their families and home places, ever cared about labels
well said JERI. It is clear what kind of music is available at folk clubs. look at the guest list , if its a singers night look at the website and find out about the resident performers.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: GUEST,Spleen Cringe
Date: 02 Oct 14 - 12:31 PM

I reckon the most we can say is that the songs we call traditional/folk songs once were part of* what we could define as 'the music of the people' but, except in a tiny minority of cases (in the UK at least), they have long since ceased to be. As Phil says, these days they are a minority interest - largely the property of enthusiasts, academics, taxiderists and a few musicians who can make a sort of living largely singing them back to the enthusiasts and a few stragglers.

Presumably, back in the good old days of no running water and rampant rural poverty, either everyone was a singer or some people (who had the talent or the bottle) sang and the rest simply listened or joined in the choruses. If it was the latter, even if the music was in common ownership, to be an owner didn't necessarily make you a practitioner. A bit like how music is produced and consumed now, except in the 20th Century the gap between producers and consumers widened. Thanks to cheap music technology, in the 21st Century its narrowing again, just as it should be.

So if what we call "folk music" was the music of the people once upon a time, this could lead us to decide that:

1) Whatever is the music of the people now is by extension, folk music;

or

2) Whatever you might call "the music of the people" now, is not folk music, because the concept of common ownership of music was warped in the 20th Century by mass media, professionalisation, the music industry and the growth of consumer culture.

and this means that

3) The music heard in folk clubs, be it traditional or comtemporary, is no longer "the music of the people" in any sense, because the people aren't interested in that sort of music and haven't been for years**. Some things that breaks out of the folk clubs and enters into the public realm (e.g. Streets of London) become the music of the people because everyone knows them and loads of people sing them. No qualitative judgement implied on my part where this happens.

Meanwhile

4) The old music of the people - be it traditional or contemporary, is the music of people who like that sort of thing. Or some of it, anyway, as this thread makes abundently clear.

This means that

5) it is unlikely that any folk songs written by and taken up by the folk club contingent, however widely, will ever become the music of the people unless they manage to break out of the folk world and become industry products for the consumer society. The rest remains minority music for specialists.

This leads me to conclude that:

6) There is gallons of music out in the world described by 'the people' and the music industry as 'folk music' and consumed as such - music that most folk afficianados wouldn't accept as folk if their lives depended on it. Meanwhile, folk as defined in various ways by the people on this thread - Jim, Michael, Jack, Ian, John, Phil, me, ANYONE - doesn't actually exist.

*************************

* I say 'part of' because all we've got is what was collected, rather than what was or may have been.

** In this versuion of events, the folk boom of the sixties was an aberation: the popularity, for a while of folk, was largely about music industry interest and the ability some musicians to make a living from folk as it coincided with the massive postwar expansion of consumer culture.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 02 Oct 14 - 01:12 PM

"I just say that it is stupid to say traditional is the only folk."
And I say it's stupid to claim a pop song is "folk" without a shred of evidence - especially as you are the only one making such a claim
"English traditional songs are the property of a small number of enthusiasts and have nothing to do with the people "
If these songs have been created passed on and kept alive by the people they are 'the people's songs - the fact that the majority of the people don't recognise them as such today is immaterial
The same majority wouldn't be the slightest bit interested in what passes for a folk music in a folk club today; following your logic, nobody has a right to regard them as 'folk songs' as 'the folk' reject them - unless, of course, today's clubs are bursting to the seams with everyday punters!
In fact, they are made up of "a small number of enthusiasts"
The ordinary people have become recipients of their culture rather than participants in it - that has yet to be addressed.
"I wonder whether the people who've been part of a tradition, who grew up with it and learned songs that were passed down through the years in their families and home places, ever cared about labels"
For those who appear to have missed it on the numerous times I have responded to this question - yes, the old singers certainly did differentiate between the different type of songs they sang and heard did in our experience - I asked if anybody would like me to provide details of their doing so AGAIN - still happy to.
Jim Carroll


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: Musket
Date: 02 Oct 14 - 02:16 PM

If you are precious about labels,who has mentioned a pop song? I never did.

You can't have it both ways, prat.

Out of interest, it is you who are interested in labels. I am the one saying if you are comfortable calling it folk, then it is.

Music of the people... More often than not, a dreamer and wannabe poet singing about others...

Are you saying 80% of what are labelled as folk in Amazon listings aren't folk at all? The people and therefore the dictionaries know what folk is, a musical genre. It is also a plural of person and whimsical term of reference for heritage traditions.

You wouldn't perchance be one of those annoying gits who when the doctor confirms you weigh x stone, you say "I mass x stone, I weigh y KN" ??

Are Dylan songs folk? Baez? MacColl? Garbutt? Paxton?

Absurd, really fucking absurd..

😄😄😄


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 02 Oct 14 - 03:12 PM

"If you are precious about labels,who has mentioned a pop song? I never did."
Not precious about labels - just arguing about what constitute a folk song
"who has mentioned a pop song? "
You specified that 'I don't like Mondays' was a folk song - I pointed out it was a pop song and nobody has ever pretended it was anything else, except you - pratt!
"I am the one saying if you are comfortable calling it folk"
It's documented and defined as such - with hundreds of books to back up that description - that's what makes it a folk song, but thank's ever so much for your permission to call it what it is anyway.
"More often than not, a dreamer and wannabe poet singing about others... "
You have evidence to show this to be the case - sure you have!!!!
My understanding is that they are songs made by soldiers, sailors. land workers, miners....
We have recorded ones made by Travellers about Travellers.
Now - you are about to show us otherwise - 'course you are!!!!
"Are Dylan songs folk? Baez? MacColl? Garbutt? Paxton? "
Can't speak for the others - MacColl always insisted his weren't - what did the rest of them claim?
"Absurd, really fucking absurd.."
Not here Muskie - save it for the confessional.
"Jim, I think, believes that traditional folk songs were the music of the people and that new songs 'in the tradition' could be again"
Can I just make one thing clear Phil
I believe that folk songs are songs made by the people, but unless people (in general) recreate the means by which new songs can be absorbed into their culture, the process is dead - no new folk-songs.
It's sad, but it doesn't stop the older songs from having entertainment value
Ordinary Londoners once flocked to see the plays of Shakespeare.
Dickens was once a 'people's, author - there are reports of long queues for the next episode of 'The Old Curiosity shop' with crowds agog to find out whether little Nell had snuffed it or not.
The fact that this is no longer the case doesn't mean we consign our two greatest writers to "the dim and distant past and replace them with 'Corrie' or Barbara Cartland.
I still get a buzz from both singing and listening to folk songs - particularly ballads - I used to do so at clubs, sadly the cances of my ever being able to do so again are rapidly disappearing with the help of people who don't actually like folk song.
I read an article in a folk magazine this morning about a young woman 'folk singer' - I was particularly drawn by her statement about "loving folk song but not being worried about damaging it"
I searched out an example of her singing on Utube - it turned out to be one of the early child ballads accompanied by intrusive, inappropriate guitar and side-drum accompaniment - not too offensive as music, crap as a way to present a ballad - any ballad.
I doubt if ballads can survive such treatment if that is how they are now being performed.   
This is my idea of a folk song which some people may not be too aware of, along with the note we've written for it showing its uniqueness, and, why, for me, these songs have their own importance beyond entertainment, though certainly that as well
Jim Carroll

Farmer Michael Hayes (The Fox Chase) (Roud 5226)
Tom Lenihan, Knockbrack, Miltown Malbay, Recorded 1976
Carroll Mackenzie Collection

I am a bold and undaunted fox that never was before in tramp.
My rent, rates and taxes I was willing for to pay;
I lived as happy as King Saul and loved my neighbours great and small,
I had no animosity for either friend or foe.

I made my den in prime good land between Tipp'rary and Knocklong,
Where my forefathers lived for three hundred years or more.
But now of late I was betrayed by one that was a fool and knave,
He told me I should quit the place and show my face no more.

But as soon as he ejected me I thought 'twas time that I should flee,
I stole away his ducks and geese and murdered all his drakes.
I knew I could no longer stand because he had the hounds at hand;
I tightened up my garters and then I was away.

But soon there was a great look-out by land and sea to find me out,
From Dublin Quay to Belfast Town, along the raging sea.
By telegraph they did insert this great reward for my arrest,
My figure, size and form, and my name without a doubt.

They wore their brogues, a thousand pair, this great reward for to obtain,
But still there was no tidings of me or my retreat.
They searched Tipp'rary o'er and o'er, the corn fields round Galtymore,
Then they went on to Wexford but there did not delay.

Through Ballyhale and Stranmore they searched the woods as they went on,
Until they got very hungry at the approach of day.
Now search the world far and near, the likes before you did not hear,
A fox to get away so clear as I did from the hounds.

They searched the rocks, the gulfs, the bays, the ships and liners at the quays,
The ferry-boats and steamers as they were going to sea.
Around the coast they took a steer from Poolbeg lighthouse to Cape Clear,
Killarney Town and sweet Tralee, and then crossed into Clare.

And when they landed on the shore they searched Kilrush from top to toe,
The bathing baths in Miltown, called otherwise Malbay.
And Galway being a place of fame they though it there I would remain,
But still their journey was in vain for I gave them leg-bail.

They searched the train in Oranmore as she was leaving for Athlone,
And every wagon, coach and cart that went along the road.
And Connemara being remote they thought that there I would resort,
They when they got weary they resolved to try Mayo.

In Ballinrobe they had to rest until the hounds were quite refreshed,
From thence they went to Westport and searched it high and low.
Through Castlebar they took a trot, they heard I was in Castlerock,
But still they were deluded, there I lodged the night before.

At Swinford's town as I sat down I heard a dreadful cry of hounds,
I took another notion to retaliate the chase.
And I being weary from the road, I took a glass at half past four,
Then I was renovated while the hounds were getting weak.

The night being dark in Castlebar I knew not how to make my way,
I had neither den nor manger for to shield me from the cold.
But when the moon began to shine I said I'd make for a foreign clime,
I am in the Land of Liberty, and three cheers for Michael Hayes!

As a young man, Tom Lenihan heard the ballad of Farmer Michael Hayes sung by his father and by local ballad seller, Bully Nevin, but never knew more than a few verses. In 1972 he obtained a full text, adapted it to what he already knew and put it to a variation of the tune he had heard. We believe it to be one of the best narrative Irish ballads we have ever come across; Tom makes a magnificent job of it.
The story, based on real events, tells of how a farmer/land agent with a reputation for harshness is evicted from his land and takes his revenge on the landlord, in some cases by shooting him, and in Tom's version by also killing off the landlord's livestock.
He takes off in an epic flight, closely followed by police with hounds and is chased around the coast of Ireland as far as Mayo where he finally escapes to America. We worked out once that the reported chase is over five hundred miles of rough ground. Tradition has it that he eventually returned home to die in Ireland.
As Georges Zimmerman points out, this ballad shows how a probably hateful character could become a gallant hero in the eyes of the oppressed peasants.
It is a rare song in the tradition, but we know it was sung in Kerry in the 1930s; Caherciveen Traveller Mikeen McCarthy gave us just one line of it:
"I am a bold "indaunted" fox that never was before on tramp"
My rents, rates and taxes I was willing for to pay.
When he heard it sung in full in a London folk club he said, "That's just how my father sang it".
Ref;
Songs of Irish Rebellion; Georges-Denis Zimmermann 1967


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: The Sandman
Date: 02 Oct 14 - 04:02 PM

All a around my hat reached no 5 in the uk charts, it did not stop being a folk song because it was popular., or because of its arrangement.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: Phil Edwards
Date: 02 Oct 14 - 05:43 PM

GSS - no indeed, but by being rocked up (or wombled up) & spliced with Farewell He, it did become a bloody poor source to learn the words or tune of "All around my hat".

Musket -

If Jim is right, then folk died years ago. If I'm right, it is a living musical genre

Jim -

I believe that folk songs are songs made by the people, but unless people (in general) recreate the means by which new songs can be absorbed into their culture, the process is dead - no new folk-songs.


This is very much how I see things, for what it's worth. It's a huge stock of songs, but it's not being added to and probably won't again, unless society changes fairly dramatically. Which is sad, but it doesn't make singing the songs any less worthwhile.

(Did classical music die years ago? Bach's music is still going strong AFAIK.)

Side note: the memory had been nagging at me for a while of hearing a song which (according to the singer's introduction) had been picked up from Travellers relatively recently, which showed that new songs were being made more recently than we might have thought. This evening I remembered the song: What Will We Do? The linked page will tell you who it was collected by.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: Big Al Whittle
Date: 02 Oct 14 - 07:50 PM

we're going round in circles because you are not listening Jim.

all the songs you like were written by someone. they became folk when a community took the song - took possession of it by performing it, amending it, using it.
who wrote it and who owns it and who gets the prs money is an irrelevance.
we are folksingers, not accountants. we don't care who gets the money - it doesn't matter. they can stop us making a huge commercial recording of it -like Oasis did with The Smurfs - they did an injunction and stopped the release.

but they can't stop what we do with the music in pubs, folk clubs,in the privacy of own homes, on the football terraces....
these are places where folksong is created, where it has always been created.
folksong isn't just the province of a few isolated communities, or dusty stuff on the shelves of some folk library.
it is there in lifeblood of all people everywhere possibly of every class - fascists sang folksongs! communists! for all I know even tories.....


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: GUEST,punkfolkrocker
Date: 02 Oct 14 - 08:08 PM

I've been reading up on early 70s 'Trad influenced singer songwriter Folkie' Allan Taylor.
He's still working & releasing CDs.

If any bloke might know a bit about "What makes a new song a folk song?"

he might just be the fella... He's only gone and got himself a PHD...

http://www.allantaylor.com/bio/index.html

"It is a unique work in that it is the first time that a full-time professional musician/songwriter has done such a study, using empirical knowledge as a basis for an academic thesis. The three foci of the thesis are:

the creative process
the power of song
the aesthetics of song.
The Ph.D. is called "Song, Song writing and the Songwriter"
"


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: GUEST,punkfolkrocker
Date: 02 Oct 14 - 08:18 PM

A lengthy, but interesting interview with a very articulate artist,
with strong views on passing the craft on to the next generation...

http://www.livingtradition.co.uk/articles/allantaylor1


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 03 Oct 14 - 03:41 AM

"we're going round in circles because you are not listening Jim."
No Al - you are not listening - or you are hearing only what you want to hear.
You've sniped at other artists, you've deliberately represented what I have said and your argument has basically been that folk music proper is out of date and the mish-mash now on offer is what has replaced it.
Sorry - that is a load of bollocks.
You have a declining umber of clubs which are a feeble shadow of what we managed in the past.
Abandoning the reason for us first getting together half a century or so ago may continue to put bums on seats for a time - the difference is, that were were putting bums on seats for a purpose - to make people aware of the wonderful musc that you and your crowd have jettisoned for your pale imitation of the pop scene.
If tat's what turns you on - fine, but it has S.F.A. to do with folk song in any shape or form, and you have not even tried to prove it has other than to denigrate what has happened in the past as part of the "dim and distant past" (shame on the individual who threw that one into the argument)
My basic argument with those I have respect for here is that I don't believe the tradition is alive, but I do believe that the old forms are important and viable enough to create new songs using them as a pattern.
Whether they become folk songs is immaterial really - nobody ever set out to write folk songs - the idea is ludicrous.
People wrote songs to capture what was happening around them - what made them laugh, or what made them angry, or sad..... loss, achievement, death, birth...whatever.
They became folk songs because they were memorable and because they were universal enough to take root wherever they landed - not the introspective, navel gazing, angst-filled singer-songwriter stuff that masquerades as folk-song now.
They were articulate and clearly understood for the ideas and emotions they carried - not the loud cacophonous stuff of the pop scene.
Of course we need new songs - but that is no reason to abandon the old ones, or write them off the way Al and Muskie have (despite the lip-service).
I get a bit pissed of being accused of living in the past by people like these.
We're working on two programmes at the present time to commemorate the 100th anniversary of the birth of MacColl - it entails poring through the hundreds of recordings we have here of The Critics Group and The Singers Club and all the incredibly inspiring and exciting talks he and Peggy and Parker... and all those others, gave on singing and song.
I've just been going through some of the songwriting workshops we did, and the wealth of material it turned out - not just Ewan and Peggy's, but the group and a whole.
One workshop turned out, Grey October, a song created after a nights work of throwing ideas at one another until we arrived at a final product.

GREY OCTOBER
Grey October in Glamorgan,
High pitheaps where the houses stand –
Fog in the valley, backshift ending.
Children awaken in Aberfan.

Warm October in Thai Binh Province
Huts of bamboo and rattan,
Sun comes up, repair gangs stop
And children waken in Thui Dan.

Pithead hooter sounds from Merthyr,
Load the coal in the waiting trams;
Shoot the slag down the high pit heap
While children eat in Aberfan.

Oxcarts rattle down Thai Binh Highway
Work begins on the broken land,
Night's work ended, the roadway's mended,
Children eat in Thui Dan.

Dai Dan Evans grabs his satchel,
Michael Jones his bread and jam,
Five to nine and the school bell ringing
Time for school in Aberfan.

School bell ringing, children running,
Down by the river and across the dam,
Hot sun burning, time for learning
Time for school in Thui Dan.

Lessons start in Pantglas Junior
Through the fog a black wave ran,
Under the weight of the man-made mountain
Children die in Aberfan.

Lessons start in the Thai Binh schoolhouse
And another day began,
Bombers fly in the morning sky
And children die in Thui Dan.

Tears are shed for Glamorgan children –
And the world mourns Aberfan:
But who will weep for the murdered children
Under the rubble of Thui Dan ?

Grey October in Glamorgan,
Warm October in Vietnam
There children die - while we stand by
And shake the killer by the hand.

Another song made by one of the members of the group was based on a centuries-old legend of the meeting of Finn MacCumhal and the French giant, applied to a bunch of navvies working in 20th century Scotland.

O'REILLY AND THE BIG McNEIL a varient on Garden where the Praties Grow-   Donneil Kennedy

Well, the day I met O'Reilly it was thirty-two below,
The sparks were flying off me pick, I was up to me neck in snow.
His footsteps shook the basement slab, I saw the sky grow black
As he roared out, 'I'm your ganger now, so dig until you crack!'

He was bigger than a dumper truck, with legs like concrete piles,
His face was like a load of bricks, his teeth were six inch files;
His eyes they shone like danger lamps, his hands were tough as steel,
But a man as small as that was never a match for Big McNeil.

When the tea came round at dinner time, He grabbed a gallon tin.
I said 'you'd better drop that fast if you would save your skin,
You may be called O'Reilly, but I will to you reveal
That the cup you've got your hands on, it belongs to big McNeil.

Well, he laughed at me and carried on as if I hadn't spoke,
He said 'A man from Dublin town can always take a joke,'
But when he picked a shovel up, wee Jimmie gave a squeal.
'You'd better drop that teaspoon, it belongs to Big McNeil.'

Well, everything the ganger touched we said to leave alone,
Or else McNeil would grind him up and make plaster of his bones,
As last O'Reilly lost his head and said he'd make a meal
Out of any labourer in the squad, especially Big McNeil.

We said McNeil was home in bed, and told him where to go,
The boys all dropped their tools and went along to watch the show,
And when we got to Renfrew street wee Jimmy danced a reel
To see him thundering at the door, to fight the big McNeil.

When the ganger got inside he saw a monster on the bed,
A mound as big as a stanchion base with a barrel size of head,
He punched it and he thumped it and he hit about with zeal,
Till the missus cried - 'Don't hurt the child, or else I'll tell McNeil.'

He was bigger than a dumper truck, with legs like concrete piles,
His face was like a load of bricks, his teeth were six inch files,
His eyes they shone like danger lamps, his hands were tough as steel,
But a man as small as that was never a match for Big McNeil.

When The Singers Club was in its prime Peggy Seeger edited 20 books of new songs, mostly containing up to twenty songs or edition, donated from all over the English speaking world         
Songs like these, coupled with age-old ballads and songs provided me with some of the high points of my life, as did some of the themed feature evenings - 'Battle of the Sexes', 'Gone For a Soldier', 'Murder, Mayhem and Mystery', 'The Female Frolic', 'The Wanton Muse', 'You Name it, We'll sing it (audeinece passing up subjets and residents digging up songs on them)... poetry prose and song evenings.... they sent us home buzzing, and listening to them again still has that effect.
I enjoys#ed the sing-around evenings - still do, but there was nothing to beat a residents night with a group of three or four people who had worked up their singing to a standard and had worked together on accompaniments so they could send an audience home with a night of good, or at least proficient singing under their belts - no "near enough for folk song" shit.
Evening of residents, then one a guest, then another involving singers singers from the floor... that was what made The Singers Club the important club that it was.
I've seen what passes for folk song now - U-tube is full of it - quite honestly, I find much of it depressing - a poor imitation of pop song - ramming a square peg into a round hole.      
Back to work
Jim Carroll


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: Musket
Date: 03 Oct 14 - 03:47 AM

Allan Taylor is one hell of an influence on me. One of the best nights I have had in years was when he and Dick Gaughan did their "both sides of The Tweed" at a concert in Matlock. The likes of Jim could learn from his research and conclusions if they hadn't shut their minds when folk moved on from their narrow interpretation.

By the way Jim. As you love to be precise over genre. I didn't mention a pop song. I Don't Like Mondays could be somewhere between punk and new wave, not pop. I am happy to call it pop mind you, but you can't because of the hole of exclusivity you have dug.

I was taken by Kris Kristofferson when seeing him live at a festival in The States once. He introduced Me and Bobby McGee by saying "If it sounds like country then I guess it's a country song."

Quite


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: GUEST,Howard Jones
Date: 03 Oct 14 - 04:27 AM

Whether Jim likes it or not, 'folk' has become a label for a genre which encompasses a very wide range of forms. Where the boundaries between this and other genres lie is inevitably unclear and subjective. 'Folk' in this sense is a term used to place this music among the other outputs of the musical world. The sense in which Jim uses it serves an entirely different purpose. Nevertheless, if 'folk' is to mean anything as a genre, it must have traditional music at its core. Everything else is an addition which has grown up around this.

Folk clubs, certainly in my experience going back to 1970, have always been more than just places where folk music, in either sense, was performed. There has always been an element of providing a venue where ordinary people can perform, which in the heyday of traditional music this would have been in the main bar of the pub rather than relegated to the back room. The folk club was a means of perpetuating this activity, where a group of people provide their own entertainment. Folk clubs have always included performances which stretch the understanding of 'folk' by any definition, as well as poetry, storytelling, etc. What has ultimately determined what is acceptable is a highly subjective sense of whether it 'feels right', and that will differ from one club to the next.

Jim's concern is that traditional music isn't held in sufficient regard and isn't performed as much as it should be in some folk clubs. Al's view, from a completely opposite perspective, is actually much the same - he complains that his music, which he regards as falling within the wider boundaries of 'folk' in the genre sense, isn't welcome at some clubs. However this is how it has always been, and most clubs provide a balance with some leaning towards traditional and some more towards contemporary. I would be just as surprised to hear only traditional songs in a folk club as I would to hear none. Perhaps the real problem is that as the number of clubs has declined there is no longer this variety and it has become more difficult to find a club which suits one's own preferences.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: Bounty Hound
Date: 03 Oct 14 - 05:33 AM

'Nevertheless, if 'folk' is to mean anything as a genre, it must have traditional music at its core. Everything else is an addition which has grown up around this.'

Well put Howard, very similar to what I've said several times, that I'm happy to call it 'folk' if it shows a respect for and an influence from the tradition, and, only a few posts back I said this 'Without the tradition, there would be no new 'folk' music, so we should at least show a respect for the tradition, and as I said earlier, for those that wish to maintain it.'

Those that maintain that the tradition is now the preserve of aged men with poor dress sense puzzle me though, I know a good number of under 30's in my local area who a regularly performing traditional songs and tunes, and taking part in singarounds and sessions. So whilst I accept that folk is a minority music, I still see a fairly healthy interest in the tradition. The other thing I don't understand is those who have contributed to this thread, and appear from their posts to have a real dislike for the tradition, but still want to hang their music on the 'folk' peg. I've asked that question a couple of times now, but there has been no answer!

John


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: Big Al Whittle
Date: 03 Oct 14 - 05:37 AM

the songs you mention, Jim have taken root in your mind and a few other places.

you are deluded.
the songs you dismiss are sung along with. danced to. people use them to celebrate the great events of their lives, musicians use them to earn a living. they are living things that people use.

they adapt them and they become folksongs. the emotional property of our nation.

asfor the folk club boom, it had damn all to do with the few things going on in London. it had much to do with Donovan appearing on Ready Steady Go, Bob Dylan's song on the radio, and Pete Seeger on Sunday Night at the London Palladium tv show - and ordinary people seeing a great movement, they wanted to be involved in. and i suppose skiffle before then. but the mushroom went off in the mid 60's.

the decline started in the 1970's when people went to folk clubs and found out it was an unpredictable business. and that you might meet an entertainer like Gerry Lockran - but you were just as likely to come into contact with a traddie, who had awarded himself a licence to bore the shit out of everybody - in the name of preserving the tradition.

I'm getting to the point in this conversation to saying you can stick the tradition up the places where the praties grow. which is a pity - there some great people living, like Brian Peters and John Kelly, deeply involved in this traditional music business.

when i think of the poor devils trying to exist in a world where they have propitiate people with tunnel vision. My heart bleeds for them.

its okay for the ones who have done well, by being in on the great folk boom, or being part of a supergroup. but imagine having to engage with this bloody nonsense that the tradition exists in a world separate from Tom Jones, The Beatles, Queen, The Kinks....yeh where the praties grow, Jim!


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: GUEST,Colin
Date: 03 Oct 14 - 06:11 AM

I've kept an eye on this thread and commented, early on, but feel a little of an outsider as a guest . However I feel I need to add my bit In response to somethings you have said Jim
"People wrote songs to capture what was happening around them - what made them laugh, or what made them angry, or sad..... loss, achievement, death, birth...whatever."
Of course people still do this.
"They became folk songs because they were memorable and because they were universal enough to take root wherever they landed - not the introspective, navel gazing, angst-filled singer-songwriter stuff that masquerades as folk-song now."
Introspection to my mind includes capturing what makes people laugh or sad or angry, dealing with personal loss etc etc…. which seems to contradict your previous point. However, what in your view constitutes a good contemporary song Jim ??? (forget whether we term it as folk or not as this will lead nowhere )…
"They were articulate and clearly understood for the ideas and emotions they carried - not the loud cacophonous stuff of the pop scene."
This seems very subjective to me Jim, but it kind of brings things down to a basic denominator of you either like a song or you don't…..


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: Musket
Date: 03 Oct 14 - 06:11 AM

Not sure where a nod to tradition comes from. We are led to believe it was diddycoys sat at the end of the caravan with locals from the village sat cross legged listening to songs about a Bonny black hare, cuckoos nest and all the other porn of the day.

There are some beautiful songs that have come up through traditional roots and some fine songs written since. If "a nod to the tradition" means anything, what does it mean?

Does it mean complaining about or celebrating your work? Shagging wenches? Gazing at waves on the shore? Does it mean a vocal technique? Using instruments that look traditional but are a modern interpretation anyway? Does it mean anything unaccompanied?

I don't know what folk is any more than anyone else trying to quantify an abstract genre, but I know which genre to click on to find June Tabor albums.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: Jack Blandiver
Date: 03 Oct 14 - 06:29 AM

(Did classical music die years ago? Bach's music is still going strong AFAIK.)

The Classical Tradition is alive and well owing to various cultural factors that keep it so, mostly born of the same privileges that inform the folk revival, but more relevant, I feel, to its central cause BUT ultimately harder to play, demanding a degree of musicianship above and beyond anything folkies get excited over by way of mere talent.

I've been obsessing over Bach's Musical Offering (Das Musikalische Opfer BWV 1079) since picking up the Jordi Savall recording at my favourite classical music shop in Norwich back in June. This consists of numerous variations on a single theme and has given rise to dozens of further variations by way of interpretations by all manner of artists over the years, none of them ever claiming to be definitive. I have about six of them - from clunky orchestral settings from the early 60s to laser-precise state-of-the-art small ensemble recordings from more recent years (i.e. the maestro Savall - watch them do it live HERE). Each one of these recordings is a very different ball game from the others but all of them, nevertheless, managing to be the Musical Offering.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: Bounty Hound
Date: 03 Oct 14 - 07:04 AM

'Not sure where a nod to tradition comes from. We are led to believe it was diddycoys sat at the end of the caravan with locals from the village sat cross legged listening to songs about a Bonny black hare, cuckoos nest and all the other porn of the day.

Is this really what you think Musket? the simple fact is that traditional music is the folk music of this country, or any country for that matter. That is precisely what the term 'folk music' was first coined to describe. Therefore it follows that if we (as most do) want to use the term 'Folk' for new songs, there must at the very least be an acknowledgement of that tradition.

John


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: Jack Blandiver
Date: 03 Oct 14 - 07:13 AM

Meanwhile, folk as defined in various ways by the people on this thread - Jim, Michael, Jack, Ian, John, Phil, me, ANYONE - doesn't actually exist.

Folk exists as long as people want it to exist, it's form is ultimately determined by a subjective construction based on an objective illusion brought about by the collective will-power of all those out there doing it and remaking it in their own image, now so more than ever, in myriad of different ways but always Folk in all its curmudgeonly fickle fallibility replete with movers, shakers, gatekeepers and the rank & file congregation to whom its truth is simply self-evident.

Me, I love it all, but whenever I get too close to it the blemishes get in the way, so I pull back and go and do something else for a while, but... The other day (moved by this very thread) I found myself listening to my Michael Grosvenor Myer CD-R in the kitchen and last night I even listened to Peter Bellamy's Fair England's Shore whilst cooking dinner, happy to sing along with Fakesongham Fair in a state of rare revery that might just lead me to listen to The Muckle Sangs when I'm cooking dinner tonight, or maybe not. More likely I'll listen to Daphne Oram or Delia Derbyshire who define my real hearts core of musical experience as they have done since I was born & I never even realised it!

I'm sure glad it's there though, this Folk World thang - a place I might visit from time to time though ultimately I lack the faith to really get involved, because when I do it always manages to fuck up and leave me downhearted. I'm like Mulder - I Want To Believe. As Arthur C. Clarke once said, he used to believe in the paranormal until he started looking at the evidence for it when he was doing his Mysterious World TV show. Like folk, get too close and - poof! - it's awa'! What remains is pure delusion, but Folkies aren't alone in that, God knoweth.

Quote Sir Bob Pegg an this very issue:

'I think we have to face the possibility that folk is an illusion created unconsciously by the people who talk about it, go out looking for it, make collections of it, write books about it, and announce to an audience that they are going to sing or play it. It is rather like a mirage which changes according to the social and cultural standpoint of whoever is looking at it. From a distance it looks distinct, almost tangible. The closer you get the more uncertain its outline becomes, until you merge with it and it disappears entirely.' From his book Folk, 1976.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 03 Oct 14 - 07:21 AM

"This seems very subjective to me Jim"
It probably is Colin - I admit - pop music as it stands means sfa to me as it stands at present - my choice.
When it is applied to folk song it turns basically narrative pieces into gibberish.
Pop certainly works for some people but for me, when compared to folk song - chalk and cheese.
Introspection when applied to song has the opposite effect that I have always found folk song has - it excludes the listener.
Tom Munnelly once put it beautifully in describing a modernist 'Sean Nos singer' - you feel you want to tap him on the shoulder as ask, "Can I come in".
We have interviewed dozens of the older generation of singers and the message we got was more or less the same each time - the songs were sharings of experiences - they were an outlet of those experiences rather than the internalising of them.
This seems to have been the thread running through all of them - certainly as far back as Sharp recording the mud-caked stone picker who sang him 'The Lark in the Morning' then, grabbed his lapels and said, "Isn't that beautiful".
I have no objection to people masturbating - I'd rather they didn't do it in public.
"you are deluded."
Please don't tell be about something I have been working at for half a century Al - I was ******* there and part of it - you appear not even to like the subject we are discussing
Jim Carroll


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: GUEST
Date: 03 Oct 14 - 07:42 AM

"you were just as likely to come into contact with a traddie, who had awarded himself a licence to bore the shit out of everybody - in the name of preserving the tradition."

Al, you were also just as likely to come across a songwriter who had awarded himself a licence to bore the shit out of everybody - in the name of sharing their inadequate love life, political or religious prejudices, drug-induced visions or whatever else they deemed fit to inflict on us.

Being boring and giving poor performances isn't the preserve of one form of music or another. It is a weakness of the folk scene that it allows, even encourages, these performers. On the other hand, it's also one of its strengths.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate
Next Page

  Share Thread:
More...

Reply to Thread
Subject:  Help
From:
Preview   Automatic Linebreaks   Make a link ("blue clicky")


Mudcat time: 1 May 9:01 PM EDT

[ Home ]

All original material is copyright © 2022 by the Mudcat Café Music Foundation. All photos, music, images, etc. are copyright © by their rightful owners. Every effort is taken to attribute appropriate copyright to images, content, music, etc. We are not a copyright resource.