BS: Israel's Sharpville

Subject: RE: BS: Israel's Sharpville
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 15 May 18 - 09:50 AM

Bruce - take that up with the British House of Commons...
who were today debating the ultra lethal calibre of the shoot to kill and maim bullets,
and calling for an enquiry...

On our British news yesterday, I saw a long processional march of right wing zealot Jewish thugs
goading Arab residents on the doorsteps of their own homes in an old narrow street...
[presumably in Jerusalem...???}

To British eyes they looked every bit like a hateful tribal gang of EDL and N.Irish Protestant marchers....

Subject: RE: BS: Israel's Sharpville
From: bobad
Date: 15 May 18 - 09:56 AM

To add to what Bruce posted; President Obama went further than Trump in his declaration that Jerusalem not only remain the capital of Israel, but that it remain undivided. Trump left the status of East Jerusalem open to negotiation.

Subject: RE: BS: Israel's Sharpville
From: beardedbruce
Date: 15 May 18 - 10:00 AM

PFR,

"and called for peace from both sides,"

Let us look at what THIS would entail:

For the Israelis, this would mean letting the demonstrators overrun the border and kill all the Jews ( the stated purpose)

For the the Palestinian, this would entail keeping back from the border and NOT attacking the Israeli troops, or throwing rocks, grenades, burning tires, et al.

So WHICH side has control of "peace"?


I ask a question- "WHICH side has control of "peace"?"

WHAT IS YOUR ANSWER?


Pick one, and stop being a shill for the Fascist supporting JC, who BY HIS OWN STANDARDS supports the Irish support of the Nazis in WWII- HE NEVER WOULD ADMIT IT, when presented with documented facts, NOR APOLOGIZE AND CONDEMN it. Since HE uses that standard on the rest of us, it applies IN SPADES to him.

Subject: RE: BS: Israel's Sharpville
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 15 May 18 - 10:10 AM

Pull out, pfr. This thread is becoming overrun by rats. Let them talk to themselves.

Subject: RE: BS: Israel's Sharpville
From: beardedbruce
Date: 15 May 18 - 10:15 AM

Mr Shaw,

Yes, I did notice a number of your kind. Take Acme with you when you leave.

Subject: RE: BS: Israel's Sharpville
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 15 May 18 - 10:19 AM

Bruce - That's disappointing...
I was hoping from our recent acquaintance that you might be a more sensible and rational debater than K & bob;
which is why I adopted a default position of polite respect towards you,
refraining from the disdain that they so rightly deserve...

oh well....

Subject: RE: BS: Israel's Sharpville
From: beardedbruce
Date: 15 May 18 - 10:27 AM

PFR,

Someone (YOU) posted
"You either really takes sides because of passionate belief in a side,
or you behave responsibly and remain neutral and objective..
"


So either "behave responsibly and remain neutral and objective", or continue to "takes sides because of passionate belief in a side"


But you can still answer the question:

For the Israelis, this would mean letting the demonstrators overrun the border and kill all the Jews ( the stated purpose).

For the Palestinian, this would entail keeping back from the border and NOT attacking the Israeli troops, or throwing rocks, grenades, burning tires, et al.

So WHICH side has control of "peace"?

Subject: RE: BS: Israel's Sharpville
From: beardedbruce
Date: 15 May 18 - 10:34 AM

PFR,

"might be a more sensible and rational debater than"


You mean, by using the same tactics as JC I have proven otherwise? Take a look at what you are saying, and get back to me...

And ANSWER THE QUESTION:

"called for peace from both sides,"

For the Israelis, this would mean letting the demonstrators overrun the border and kill all the Jews ( the stated purpose).(- RESULT: DEAD JEWS AND PALESTINIANS ;JC's, Acme's, and Mr Shaw's preference)

For the Palestinians, this would entail keeping back from the border and NOT attacking the Israeli troops, or throwing rocks, grenades, burning tires, et al. (- RESULT - NOBODY HURT ;My preference)

So WHICH side has control of "peace"?

Subject: RE: BS: Israel's Sharpville
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 15 May 18 - 10:39 AM

YOU are clearly hysterical [ at least on the evidence of these most recent posts ]..
and most probably not the ideal type of personality who should be included in any peace talks,
which stand a hope of reasonable success...

Life in England might not be ideal, but I'm sure glad I'm not a humanist musician, artist, or writer
enduring life under the current right wing Israeli regime...

Subject: RE: BS: Israel's Sharpville
From: bobad
Date: 15 May 18 - 10:39 AM

BTW, I can't help but savour the tasty irony from someone who maintains the hoary, anti-Semitic trope that Israel stole the land of the Palestinians when that person lives on land stolen from the Mexicans. Irony can be sweet, hypocrisy not so much.

Subject: RE: BS: Israel's Sharpville
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 15 May 18 - 10:45 AM

bob - so you'll be first in line to hand Canada back to it's rightful occupants...??????

Oh yes that's right - 60 shot to death yesterday..
and all you are capable of is cheap jibes at anyone who doen't revel in it...

Subject: RE: BS: Israel's Sharpville
From: beardedbruce
Date: 15 May 18 - 10:46 AM

PFR,

You seem to think that "musician, artist, or writer" MUST be left wing:

YOU may choose only to look at AArt from one side, but most reasonable people look at the ART and judge it on it's merits, rather than on the political bent of the Artist.

Was Homer left wing?

Was Shakespeare?

How about Keats?

I'm sure glad I'm not a humanist musician, artist, or writer
enduring life under ANY of the current Arab regimes...


NOW ANSWER THE QUESTION:

"called for peace from both sides,"

For the Israelis, this would mean letting the demonstrators overrun the border and kill all the Jews ( the stated purpose).(- RESULT: DEAD JEWS AND PALESTINIANS ;JC's, Acme's, and Mr Shaw's preference)

For the Palestinians, this would entail keeping back from the border and NOT attacking the Israeli troops, or throwing rocks, grenades, burning tires, et al. (- RESULT - NOBODY HURT ;My preference)

So WHICH side has control of "peace"?