Lyrics & Knowledge Personal Pages Record Shop Auction Links Radio & Media Kids Membership Help
The Mudcat Cafesj

Post to this Thread - Printer Friendly - Home
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]


Are racist, but traditional, songs OK?

Related threads:
Steamboat coonjine songs (67)
Minstrel Shows, Part Two (81)
What is the etymology of 'Pattyroller'? (40)
Slavery-Era Song, 'Run, ======, Run' (83)
'Coon Songs' Revisited (13)
Lyr Add: Minstrel Coonjine Songs (6)
Offensive lyrics- edit? (54)
(origins) Origins: Free at Last/I Thank God I'm Free at Last (8)
Lyr Req: Give That Nigger Ham (Parker/Woolbright) (23)
Chord Req: Josh White - Run Mona Run (4)
Tune Req: Fiddle tune 'The Patter Roll' (6)
Lyr Req: Oh, Mona (24)
'Coon Songs' Your Thoughts About Them (145)
(origins) Origins: Run, Nigger, Run (92)
Ethics for Performers (35)
Tune Req: I'd Rather be a Nigger than a Poor White (11)
Singing In Dialect (70)
Racist songs .... arghhhh! (115) (closed)
Minstrel Shows (117) (closed)
Advice Please? - use of offensive words in songs (113)
Trad lyrics that are not PC (17)
Are lyrics offensive (69)
Preserve Politically Incorrect Songs??? (73)
Is 'Piccaninnies' Non-PC ? (94)
'Offensive' words in song lyrics (73)
darkeys - offensive term, or not? (49)
Lyr Add: Run, Jimmie, Run (4)


GUEST,Paul Seligman 14 Oct 11 - 04:43 AM
GUEST,Paul Seligman 14 Oct 11 - 09:13 AM
Keith A of Hertford 14 Oct 11 - 09:24 AM
The Sandman 15 Oct 11 - 08:40 AM
GUEST,blogward 25 Oct 11 - 05:11 AM
Jeri 29 May 20 - 08:54 PM
meself 29 May 20 - 09:03 PM
meself 29 May 20 - 09:09 PM
Jim Carroll 30 May 20 - 03:23 AM
The Sandman 30 May 20 - 03:28 AM
Vic Smith 30 May 20 - 06:41 AM
Jim Carroll 30 May 20 - 06:59 AM
AllisonA(Animaterra) 30 May 20 - 07:23 AM
Jack Campin 30 May 20 - 07:31 AM
Jim Carroll 30 May 20 - 07:40 AM
Doug Chadwick 30 May 20 - 07:56 AM
GUEST,Rigby 30 May 20 - 07:58 AM
Vic Smith 30 May 20 - 08:38 AM
Jeri 30 May 20 - 09:16 AM
Vic Smith 30 May 20 - 09:50 AM
GUEST,Don Meixner 30 May 20 - 10:15 AM
Jim Carroll 30 May 20 - 10:21 AM
Jim Carroll 30 May 20 - 10:33 AM
Mrrzy 30 May 20 - 10:57 AM
Mrrzy 30 May 20 - 10:59 AM
meself 30 May 20 - 11:07 AM
Jim Carroll 30 May 20 - 11:52 AM
punkfolkrocker 30 May 20 - 11:53 AM
Jim Carroll 30 May 20 - 12:56 PM
Joe Offer 30 May 20 - 04:00 PM
punkfolkrocker 30 May 20 - 04:17 PM
The Sandman 30 May 20 - 04:37 PM
Stilly River Sage 30 May 20 - 05:40 PM
Joe Offer 30 May 20 - 07:26 PM
punkfolkrocker 30 May 20 - 07:32 PM
punkfolkrocker 30 May 20 - 07:39 PM
punkfolkrocker 31 May 20 - 01:02 AM
Jim Carroll 31 May 20 - 03:02 AM
Thompson 31 May 20 - 06:00 PM
Joe G 31 May 20 - 06:20 PM
GUEST,Starship 31 May 20 - 06:24 PM
Jim Carroll 01 Jun 20 - 02:52 AM
Joe G 01 Jun 20 - 05:05 AM
GUEST,BlackAcornUK 01 Jun 20 - 05:39 AM
Steve Shaw 01 Jun 20 - 11:15 AM
Jim Carroll 01 Jun 20 - 12:02 PM
GUEST,BlackAcornUK 01 Jun 20 - 12:19 PM
Steve Shaw 01 Jun 20 - 03:56 PM
GUEST,BlackAcornUK 01 Jun 20 - 06:21 PM
Joe G 01 Jun 20 - 06:37 PM
Share Thread
more
Lyrics & Knowledge Search [Advanced]
DT  Forum Child
Sort (Forum) by:relevance date
DT Lyrics:













Subject: RE: Are racist, but traditional, songs OK?
From: GUEST,Paul Seligman
Date: 14 Oct 11 - 04:43 AM

Thanks to all for contributing to the debate I started.

I am heartened that I was not alone in my reaction to this event, and I am glad that folkies are interested to discuss the principles, in many cases very thoughtfully.

A few other thoughts:

•        I'm surprised at the many fundamentalists who say you mustn't change a word of a folk song – I thought that was the 'folk process' and not the preservation of sacred texts, except for academic or historical purposes. And there are usually many versions of any truly traditional song, as has been pointed out in the thread, so it happens all the time.

•        Child was an academic (a professor at Harvard). A commemorative article in the 2006 edition of the Harvard Magazine states:

<<< He made no attempt to conceal or apologize for the sexuality, theatrical violence, and ill-concealed paganism of many ballads, but it is characteristic of the man that in his introduction to "Hugh of Lincoln," an ancient work about the purported murder of a Christian child by a Jew, he wrote, "And these pretended child-murders, with their horrible consequences, are only a part of the persecution which, with all moderation, may be rubricated as the most disgraceful chapter in the history of the human race" >>> (quoted from Wikipedia)

•         I am generally against censorship, book burning etc. However, society collectively accepts certain restrictions on liberty and free speech, such as (in the UK) laws against speech likely to incite race hatred or violence. Before these laws were introduced, discrimination in employment, sales and services was commonplace and it was still possible to see notices for accommodation stating things like 'no blacks, no Irish, no dogs'. The restrictions on speech were bitterly resented but the changes in law did help lead society to a more tolerant place.

•        I didn't think it necessary to explain that when Steeleye Span sang of a 'lady gay' they were not using the word in its modern meaning of homosexual; I was wrong.

•        'Merchant of Venice' is one of the greatest works in English. Aware that his audience would harbour anti-Semitic stereotypes and initially jeer the Jew, Shakespeare first explains the extreme pressure on Shylock resulting in his deranged demand, and then shows us the essential humanity he shares with all people ('if you prick us, do we not bleed?' etc). Hugh of Lincoln has no such nuances.

•        I hadn't thought of 'Black Girl/In the Pines/Where Did You Sleep Last Night' as racist ('black' is not generally considered offensive per se in the UK, we have just had Black History Week, for example). I sometimes sing it to myself when walking though pine woods. I don't think I'll stop now.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: Alisdair Robert's response
From: GUEST,Paul Seligman
Date: 14 Oct 11 - 09:13 AM

I sent Alasdair Robert's contact address (fromhis web site) and email I'll reproduce the entire email exchange unedited [except as indicated in brackets].

I think the best you can say, from my perspective, is that Alasdair just doesn't get it. I could say something even less complementary. But as he doesn't seem to think it worth reading a thread commenting on his music, he won't see that comment!

Me:
If Alasdair hasn't seen this thread, he may find it of interest - I'd be interested to hear his response [followed by link to this thread and my full name and contact details]

Alasdair Roberts: Thanks for sending the link. Somebody else already drew my attention to the thread. I haven't read it in its entirety- only the first message.

It's regrettable to have caused offence; however, I think it's healthy that the song, whether in performance or on record, should provoke thought in this individual (the first poster), thereby resulting in the ensuing discussion around this sensitive subject matter.

Best wishes,

Alasdair


Me:
I am the originator of the thread (pretty obvious as my full name is there, I don't hide behind nicknames etc).

I walked out of your performance and was upset for hours and to some extent it was on my mind for days.

Glad you think that's healthy.

Paul

Alasdair Roberts:
Hello Paul,

I am sorry to have caused you any upset.

Perhaps I should have phrased it differently. Despite the obvious upset, I find it encouraging that the situation has provoked some discussion around matters arising from your reaction to the performance.

All the best, and perhaps I'll see you at a gig in Cardiff or nearby some day.

Alasdair


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Are racist, but traditional, songs OK?
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 14 Oct 11 - 09:24 AM

Would it be ok to write a song about the hardships of settlers anywhere?
Say, N.America or Australia?


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Are racist, but traditional, songs OK?
From: The Sandman
Date: 15 Oct 11 - 08:40 AM

I think it is perfectly ok to sing about white people having their farms burned in Zimbabwe, Ithink it is perfectly ok to sing songs about black people in zimbabwe being killed by fellow africans, I think it is ok to sing songs about africans being mistreated by whites.
regardless of peoples clour if people suffer injustice there should be no reason why people shoiuld not sing songs about that injustice, whether the vitims are pink black brown yellow or whatever


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Are racist, but traditional, songs OK?
From: GUEST,blogward
Date: 25 Oct 11 - 05:11 AM

'Provoke' is an apt word. A performer should recognise that a particular lyric is provocative, and either find an alternative or give a caveat before performing it. It's not as though there is any shortage of material. Not to accept the responsibility for what even one of your audience might feel is at best ignorant, at worst cynical. Saying 'sorry' afterwards doesn't cut it.

I saw Eric Clapton and his pals a year or two ago doing 'Old Black Joe', and wondered about the spectacle of several very comfortably wealthy middle-aged white men choosing to play a song (and I love Jerry Lee Lewis' version) which while not explicitly racist, is the sentimentalisation of the death of a slave. There are thousands of other great songs they could have played without that sour note, of which they appeared ignorant. Would they have played it in front of Barack Obama?

Find an alternative or write your own; if you think dropping 'politically incorrect' material results in folk music becoming bland, find a contemporary political issue to sing about, or just write better.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Are racist, but traditional, songs OK?
From: Jeri
Date: 29 May 20 - 08:54 PM

Refresh


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Are racist, but traditional, songs OK?
From: meself
Date: 29 May 20 - 09:03 PM

Why was this refreshed? Slow day on Mudcat?


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Racist songs .... arghhhh!
From: meself
Date: 29 May 20 - 09:09 PM

Why?


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Are racist, but traditional, songs OK?
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 30 May 20 - 03:23 AM

Bit more complicated than that Meself, but well worth refreshing (not sure we need two)
Many of the traditional songs containing racist references are not 'racist' by intention, but merely reflect the commonplace of the times they were made
That doesn't make them 'ok' any more than the values they reflect were "ok", but they are interesting views of history
I find the sea song, 'The Flying Cloud' one of the best in the genre as it takes the opposite view to that which was current at the time by expressing pity for the plight of black slaves dying on the voyage from Africa in the vivid way it does
Jim


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Are racist, but traditional, songs OK?
From: The Sandman
Date: 30 May 20 - 03:28 AM

that is the same reason i like the isle de france, it is about someione showing compassion.
there is no need to sing the verse in polly wolly doodle, i jumped on a nigger, cos i thought he was a hoss, if i sang the song i would sing jumped on a ligger[ a long bit of wood]


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Are racist, but traditional, songs OK?
From: Vic Smith
Date: 30 May 20 - 06:41 AM

There is also the problem of the meaning of language changing with time. In the lovely song Gathering Rushes the angry father shouts at his unmarried pregnant daughter:-
Oh! Was it by a black man or was it by a brown?
which in current parlance has a racist bent, but in the Edinburgh of my boyhood a black man, a brown man or a fair or blond man referred to the colour of their hair; in fact in 1950s Edinburgh I don't remember seeing any brown or black skinned people. I am sure that is what this implies.
My wife, Tina sings this song and has altered this line to:-
Oh! Was it by a black-haired man or was it by a brown?


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Are racist, but traditional, songs OK?
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 30 May 20 - 06:59 AM

The 'Brown Girl' explanation ranges from her being someone 'ungentile' or of the lower classes because she is used to outdoor work or even a Gypsy living the outdoor life
Jim


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Racist songs .... arghhhh!
From: AllisonA(Animaterra)
Date: 30 May 20 - 07:23 AM

Because it's pertinent, always.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Are racist, but traditional, songs OK?
From: Jack Campin
Date: 30 May 20 - 07:31 AM

Seems a weird time to refresh this (and another thread on a similar topic). It's not like racist songs have anything to do with what's currently happening in the US.

My nomination for something you'd think was offensive but wasn't: the English hornpipe "Black Mary's Hole". She had black hair and her "hole" was a London pub in the late 17th century which was a notorious thieves' hangout.
Jim wanted to talk about racist terms in the "foul-mouthed" thread. I thought one of these would be a more appropriate place.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Racist songs .... arghhhh!
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 30 May 20 - 07:40 AM

"Because it's pertinent, always."
Amen to that
Around the time I joined this forum th British National Party targeted and attempted to infiltrate and use the folk scene for their propaganda
Luckily, the vigilance of the Anti-Nazi League nipped that in the bud
Jim


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Racist songs .... arghhhh!
From: Doug Chadwick
Date: 30 May 20 - 07:56 AM

Subject: RE: Racist songs .... arghhhh!
From: Jeri - PM
Date: 29 May 20 - 08:54 PM

Refresh

--------"--------

Why?

--------"--------

Because it's pertinent, always.

--------"-------

Subject: RE: Are racist, but traditional, songs OK?
From: Jeri - PM
Date: 29 May 20 - 08:54 PM

Refresh



... but why refresh both threads and split the discussion. A refresh here with a link to the other thread, or vice versa, would have been better.

DC


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Are racist, but traditional, songs OK?
From: GUEST,Rigby
Date: 30 May 20 - 07:58 AM

I missed this thread first time around. I'm a big fan of Alasdair Roberts and remember being startled when I heard the recorded version of Little Sir Hugh.

I haven't heard him play it live, but I can see why you might choose not to preface it with an apologetic introduction. That would bracket it off as a historical anomaly and rob it of its power by making it more comfortable. Presenting it without introduction perhaps forces the audience to think a bit more. It's a brave thing to do though.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Are racist, but traditional, songs OK?
From: Vic Smith
Date: 30 May 20 - 08:38 AM

I'm a big fan of Alasdair Roberts and remember being startled when I heard the recorded version of Little Sir Hugh.
I remember a long conversation with Alistair over breakfast in a hotel in Brussels in 2009. We were both involved in an 'Alan Lomax' weekend festival. He was asking me my opinion on whether he should record Little Sir Hugh as he knew it would be controversial though he really liked the song. From what I remember, I said that in some versions, there is no mention of a "Jew's Garden" and said that a lot would depend on the way that it was interpreted. That led to a mention of the 2004 film of The Merchant of Venice in which Al Pacino gives a sympathetic portrayal of Shylock. I can't see an objection to 'an apologetic introduction' even if it says that anti-semitism as and has been a problem in Europe over centuries and this song reflects that.

I was put in a difficult position after someone approached me at the end of an evening at our club to complain that one of our floor singers had sung that song. I had to answer that I did not know or censor in advance which songs were going to be sung and that if he wanted to take it up with the singer, I would introduce them and then hang around to make sure that the conversation was polite.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Racist songs .... arghhhh!
From: Jeri
Date: 30 May 20 - 09:16 AM

If people don't wish to discuss "racist songs", just walk away. The politics-only stuff will be deleted.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Racist songs .... arghhhh!
From: Vic Smith
Date: 30 May 20 - 09:50 AM

Around the time I joined this forum th British National Party targeted and attempted to infiltrate and use the folk scene for their propaganda
Luckily, the vigilance of the Anti-Nazi League nipped that in the bud


My memory says that it was Folk Against Fascism that fought this particular battle though the Anti-Nazi League did sterling work on the wider music scene.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Are racist, but traditional, songs OK?
From: GUEST,Don Meixner
Date: 30 May 20 - 10:15 AM

I did a collection of historical songs about water ways and travel at the Erie Canal Museum in Syracuse, NY. While we think of the Minstrel Shows travelling the Mississippi River on steam boats The minstrel shows traveled the canal as well. One of the songs I discussed was Buffalo Gals. Buffalo Gals started life as a variety of songs, most notably Lubly Fan. And it lampooned African American life. I did a much more sanitized version.

I also mentioned Kingdom Comin' (The Year of Jubilo) and like Old Black Joe altho' they are usually sung in a presumed slave accent they are not racist in the writing. And while I will not intentionally do a performance that diminishes the life of anyone in the audience I make it clear that as a historian sometimes we have to discuss uncomfortable times in the humane experience.

The best glimpse of our history is in the writings from the era a
into which we are looking.

Don Meixner


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Racist songs .... arghhhh!
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 30 May 20 - 10:21 AM

"Folk Against Fascism "
You're right Vic - it was
THer goes the blue pencil again - it seems utterly ludicrous that ou discussions are now being channeled to suit the whim of moderators whose only input here is to have reopened this thread and, in her oly earlir posting to make the type of succinctly and inciteful general political point that she is now objecting to
The times certainly have changed in twelve years Jeri
Jim


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Are racist, but traditional, songs OK?
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 30 May 20 - 10:33 AM

MacColl and Seeger sang fascinating British and American variants of @Sir Hugh' on the 'Long Harvest' and made it clear in the notes the reason why they did so and why they wouldn't sing it elsewhere
I'm in a similar position with my Irish Child Ballad project - I've located several excellent versions that were taken to the US and Canada early in the 20th century from Ireland
I have yet to decide whether to try to find a singer to sing them or to leave them in print
On of the most powerful versions of this Ballad can be heard sung by Cecilia Costello, whose father brought it to England from Ballinasloe, County Galway
I used to shun Shakespeare's 'Merchant of Venice' until I saw Al Pacino's exelent filmed production of it a few years ago
I came to realise that, presented a certain way, these stories could carry a powerful message for today
Jim


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Are racist, but traditional, songs OK?
From: Mrrzy
Date: 30 May 20 - 10:57 AM

I wondered if my question about songs using once-normal but now-slur[ish] terms had been inappropriate in the swearing thread.

So do you bowdlerize, explain, or just sing? In the black-or-brown-man song, I would say in my intro, these upcoming color terms refer to hair color. Then I would sing it as normal.

But if the once-normal word were Nigger, I would likely bowdlerize. Or choose another song. And it's that last choice that bothers me. Take the Just So story about the leopard getting spots... There is a line in there that should not make whole that story unreadable-aloud (or allowed, haha). It is a great story.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Racist songs .... arghhhh!
From: Mrrzy
Date: 30 May 20 - 10:59 AM

I am mentioning here that I've asked a question on the other thread I'd like answered, but don't want to duplicate.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Are racist, but traditional, songs OK?
From: meself
Date: 30 May 20 - 11:07 AM

Have you read through everything that's already been posted on the topic? I think you'll find every possible permutation of every possible argument on the subject already here and on the other related thread; nothing new under the sun here ... But - carry on!


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Are racist, but traditional, songs OK?
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 30 May 20 - 11:52 AM

A difficult one MrrzY (are you really from Liverpool?)
Personally, I wouldn't sing a song where the racist content is malicious -As a singer - if it just reflected the language of the times I would change it so as to reflect my own language usage and also, so as not to give offence, especially in Britain and America, both of which have acute and accelerating racism problems
My grandfather sailed before sail and remembered a few shanties from those days (his son, my uncle Jerry, once sang them to a crowd of folkies at Whitby)
One of the shanties was 'Johnny Comes Down from Hilo, which had the verse;

"I've never seen the like since I was born
As a big buck n..... with his sea-boots on"

I heard it sung at home like that, yet our family was fanatically anti racict - my grandmother was arrested for hitting Mosly with a stone at a Blackshirt rally in Liverpool
If I'd have uttered a word of racicm like that I heard in school I'd have been flung out on my arse

If you decide to sing blues, any of the black singers used the term unselfconciously - we wouldn't get away with it, nor should we

I have a song we recorded from Irish Travellers which contains the term "nacker" - a deeply offensive racist term when used by buffers such as us
I want to learn it - what do I do ?
I'll almost certainly change the term to 'Traveller' or 'Tinker'
These old songs have survive as long as they have because the singers have constantly adapted them to suit the times
We no longer have an oral tradition but there's no reason not to change the songs
As a researcher the song would remain as we found it - probably with an accompanying note
Jim
Our song, from Mary Delaney, Blid Travelling woman

Mary Delaney sings Donnelly
There was a jolly knacker* and he had a jolly ass,
And he stuffed his box of pepper up the jolly asses arse.
Oh then, “Brave done Donnelly, good enough,” says she,
Oh then, “Well done Donnelly, and you're my man,” says she.

There was an old woman in the corner over eighty years or more.
And, “For God Almighty's sake”, she says, “will you solder my old po?”
Oh then, “Well done Donnelly, good enough”, says she.
Oh then, “Well done Donnelly, and you’re my man”, says she.

I soldered in the kitchen and I soldered in the hall,
And when I finished soldering I done the ladies and all.
Oh then, “Brave ould Donnelly, good enough”, says she.
Oh then, “Brave ould Donnelly, and you’re my man”, says she.

She sent me up the stairs for to dress the tinker’s bed,
The jolly knacker followed after me and tripped me on the leg.
Oh then, “Well done Donnelly, good enough”, says she.
Oh then, “Well done Donnelly, and you’re my man”, says she.

If you’re an honest woman as I took you for to be,
You’d have a basket on your arm and a kid belonging to me,
Oh then, “Well done Donnelly, good enough”, says she.
Oh then, “Well done Donnelly, and you’re my man”, says she.

I am a jolly tinker oh, for ninety years or more;
And a divil a finer job, me lad, I never done before.
Oh then, “Brave ould Donnelly, g’out that sir”, said she.
Oh then, “Well done Donnelly, and you’re my man”, said she.

* knacker: originally a horse for slaughter but also used for tinsmith; often now a general word for traveller.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Racist songs .... arghhhh!
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 30 May 20 - 11:53 AM

The Rock Against Racism youth music culture movement was a defining force
in the formative years of my generation..
We grew up culturally institutionalised racist in the 1960s and early 70s,
but because of Rock Against Racism and the Anti Nazi Leauge, we had our eyes and minds opened in our later teens..

This politicized a significant number of us for the rest of our lives..

In the early 80s the racists fought back with n@zi skinhead OI bands,
but multi cultural Two Tone Ska bands won over a greater multitude of UK youth...

But our anonymous GUEST demonstrates the right still fester on, and are now thanks to social media, gaining increasing victories...

The popular songs I grew up with 40 years ago are classics of direct confrontation with racist brainwashing...

I'd hope today's young progressive song writers are strong enough to deal with the tidal wave of new Govt approved xenophobia...

UK & USA youth need to retake culture back from Trump and Johnson..

I'm an old bloke now and don't listen to much new music,
so don't know how prevalent openly racist new songs might be...???


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Racist songs .... arghhhh!
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 30 May 20 - 12:56 PM

The American Civil Right's Movement would not have moved as successful and memorable as it was without the songs, and those songs could never have had the impact they did if it hadn't been for the debate that went along with it
I rermember singing the ballad of Jimmy Wilson at a club in Manchester on night abd being approached by a middle-aged black lady who, rather than talk about the song, immediately lunched into a long description of life in the South pre- sixties
For her, the songs and the politics were inseparable
Similar in Manchester when I took over Mike Yates's flat - when Martin Luther King was assassinated, the father o a black family living in the next house knocked on the door and asked me to come in and 'drink to Martin' - he and his wife had been to the club I sang at with Harry Boardman
Horse and carriage
Jim


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Are racist, but traditional, songs OK?
From: Joe Offer
Date: 30 May 20 - 04:00 PM

Jeri and I agreed that it was getting confusing to have two threads open on basically the same subject, so I moved all the posts from the last couple days over to here.

Jim Carroll brings up the verse from "Johnny Come Down to Hilo":
    "I've never seen the like since I was born
    As a big buck n..... with his sea-boots on"

I came across that conundrum when we were doing the Rise Again Songbook in 2014-15. I didn't work on the first volume, Rise Up Singing (RUS), but I sure heard the complaints about how our editors bowdlerized so many songs. RUS was updated by the publisher, Sing Out! Magazine, and most of the worst bowdlerizations were removed. We really wanted to use this song, because it's so much fun to sing and has such a great chorus - but we had to figure out how to deal with the Sea Boots Problem. One suggestion was to change the line to "a big buck farmer with his sea boots on." I think I had to have a minor tantrum to get that one thrown out. I think what I suggested was "a Barbadian sailor with his sea-boots on," but we ended up with "An American sailor with his sea-boots on." I'm not totally happy with any solution, but we had to do something. There was no way we could publish a community songbook with the original lyrics, even though we tried hard to be historically accurate.

One battle I lost big-time was on "Sweet Betsy from Pike." I wanted to include all 11 original verses, but the editor insisted that we had to cut. We ended up with 8, not all original - and he cut out the "Hangtown" verse because he thought people might be offended by the glorification of hanging. This is the most famous song about the area where I lived and I've spent a lot of time researching it, so it was important to me to have all the verses. But I lost that fight. We also cut out most of "Lydia the Tattooed Lady" for reasons of space, but that really bothered me. Otherwise, I think we did pretty well.

-Joe-


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Are racist, but traditional, songs OK?
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 30 May 20 - 04:17 PM

Joe - so where's my post...???

Which was entirely relevant to the other thread.

At least put that back in the "Racist songs .... arghhhh!" thread.

Along with Jim's meaningful reply...

    Found it. It's above. -Joe-


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Are racist, but traditional, songs OK?
From: The Sandman
Date: 30 May 20 - 04:37 PM

well joe, i changed bick buck niiii to an old shell back with his sea boots on


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Are racist, but traditional, songs OK?
From: Stilly River Sage
Date: 30 May 20 - 05:40 PM

There are two threads going, PFR, you may be on the other one?


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Are racist, but traditional, songs OK?
From: Joe Offer
Date: 30 May 20 - 07:26 PM

That's perfect, Sandman. Much better than what we came up with.

-Joe-


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Are racist, but traditional, songs OK?
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 30 May 20 - 07:32 PM

Stilly - thanks, we were aware of that overnight anomaly of 2 zombie threads rising from the grave...

My post has now been reinstated in "Racist songs .... arghhhh!",
but not Jim's reply
which refers to the historic vital civil rights movement,
and was also just as relevant to a music thread about racism...

Our jokey references to a shit stirring GUEST's deleted post,
were only minor elements of our posts..

So, I seriously request, Jim's post should also be reinstated...

cheers...

I removed the remark on the top that was addressing the troll who recently opened that thread to post his typical flavor of troll nastiness. That's the only reason it was open, and a couple of "regular" people stumbled into it.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Are racist, but traditional, songs OK?
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 30 May 20 - 07:39 PM

Joe - I've just noticed your amendment.. thanks

I think my post is more relevant in the other thread than here.
But in both is ok by me...

RAR and ANL were massively important to the UK music scene,
and possibly had great influence in other parts of the music world.

Though I still ask for Jim's post to be put back with mine as well...
cheers...

    I can't find any post from Jim other than the ones just above and below yours in this thread. -Joe-


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Are racist, but traditional, songs OK?
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 31 May 20 - 01:02 AM

Joe & Stilly - thanks.. well modded...

That's exactly the compromise edit I'd have made to my post if asked to;
if we had that function available...

I make no secret I have much respect for Jim's wisdom and experience,
even though he can be a bit..
errrmm.. well... too difficult for some folks.. some times..

So, thanks also for putting his post back up...

cheers...


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Are racist, but traditional, songs OK?
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 31 May 20 - 03:02 AM

"2errrmm.. well... too difficult for some folks.. some times.."
Can't we all PFR :-)
Some recognise the fact, especially when it is over-emphasised - others never do - only Donald Trump was born perfect
I think it's a great idea to combine the two threads - can think why both were opened
Jim


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Are racist, but traditional, songs OK?
From: Thompson
Date: 31 May 20 - 06:00 PM

Nope.

When race hatred is an amusing memory of a historical oddity, and nobody would dream of thinking less of someone who has a different colour skin from them, or referring to this skin colour as 'race' - then, perhaps, historical re-enactors could clown around singing such songs. Not till then, though.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Are racist, but traditional, songs OK?
From: Joe G
Date: 31 May 20 - 06:20 PM

I would have thought the simple answer was just 'No'

Citing tradition as an excuse to perform racist material (or 'black up' in a morris team - and I don't want to reopen that can of worms) is not acceptable in my view. Why on earth would anyone want to sing a racist song anyway unless they were racist themselves?


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Are racist, but traditional, songs OK?
From: GUEST,Starship
Date: 31 May 20 - 06:24 PM

Could not agree more, Joe G.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Are racist, but traditional, songs OK?
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 01 Jun 20 - 02:52 AM

"Could not agree more, Joe G."
I think I made it clear tht this is my view too, but I would like to clarify that
The 'language' at the time these songs were made may have been racist but this doesn't automatically mean that the intention of the song was - that was the way things were expressed "in the bad old slavery days"
I've heard good versions of both 'The Flying Cloud' and 'The Banks of the Nile' containing racist language; in the latter it says "To fight the blacks and heathens on the Banks...."
I've adapted it to 'Fight another battle", but somehow, it seems to lose its visual strength - I've learned to live with that
The song was given to us by an old farm-worker, Pat MacNamara, one of the kindest and most tolerant men we met, without a racist bone in his body; he sang it all his long life without having thought about it
We got the same song from a now long-dead lady from this town (about Ten miles south from Pat's home-place), Nora Cleary, she was of similar friendly character to Pat
Nora's version uses the "n" word in the same line)
I'm a singer who also researches - I would edit the songs if I sang them (or not sing them at all), but I would document and archive them as we received them - they are important songs which carry essential parts of our history - part of that history is the vernacular that gives a fuller picture of the people who sang the songs - warts and all

I know there were overtly racist songs made at certain points of our histories, particularly 19th century Anti-Irish ones made in America by organisations set up to oppose the flood of immigrants fleeing the famine, but as far as I know, few survived in the repertoires of singers
I can see no reason do dredge them up from 'the dustbin of history' other than for historical information   

I've always been careful and somewhat reticent in editing the songs I sing, not because of any 'purism' but for fear of losing something, both from the superbly concise language of our folk songs, and from the minute details of information they often carry
Jim


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Are racist, but traditional, songs OK?
From: Joe G
Date: 01 Jun 20 - 05:05 AM

I agree Jim (not often that happens ;-) ). I was going to add to my original comment that any historical record of a song should stand as a reminder of less enlightened times (though seeing what is happening in the US makes me wonder if we are going back there thanks to Trump and his red neck supporters). There is just no reason to sing it


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Are racist, but traditional, songs OK?
From: GUEST,BlackAcornUK
Date: 01 Jun 20 - 05:39 AM

I know Ali, but haven't spoken to him about this - I remember him playing this song at gigs around a decade ago, but I wasn't following the lyrics, and was unaware of the content and connotations at that time. In more recent years, I've actually declined the opportunity to buy traditional records that include 'The Jew's Garden' because I find it so offensive.

For what it's worth, Ali is in no way racist; of course, to me it seems absolutely right that controversial choices like this should provoke debate. Despite the ongoing turbulence of the contemporary political landscape, in general I think the advances we've made as a society in just the last 10 years, in terms of awareness and judgement around these matters, mean that such unexpected and unhappy musical encounters are - thankfully - ever-less likely. But, we shouldn't be complacent, and when they do emerge it's right that they serve cause for challenge and discussion.

I can imagine a situation where a song is heavily caveated with a contextualising and critiquing introduction, such as 'this is a very dark reminder of the deep roots of antisemitism in our social history - the true villains here are not the characters of the song, but those that wrote and sang it in order to reinforce prejudice'.

However, in general, my view is that these songs shouldn't be sung. In some cases, there are obviously racist lyrics or verses that can be tweaked or omitted - Tomorrow Shall Be My Dancing Day is a great example of a number that is regularly performed, and for a long time, thankfully, without the antisemitic verse.

If we take Sharp's 'trinity' of characteristics which underpin the tradition - continuity, variation and selection - songs that are racist in totality should cease to be 'selected' - they'll remain in the historical record, but will hopefully fall out of the repertoire.

Taking the example of TMSBMDD, if songs can be 'varied' in order to remove the taint of racism - enabling continued 'selection' and keeping the songs alive in terms of the bulk of the lyric, and the tune (thus maintaining a 'living' rather than 'inert' continuity), this seems very clearly to be the best option.

This isn't to draw a veil over the history of such songs - keeping them alive in altered form still allows the space to discuss their previous shape, as a cautionary tale and to encourage vigilance against more subtle/covert contemporary forms of prejudice.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Are racist, but traditional, songs OK?
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 01 Jun 20 - 11:15 AM

When I was little, my mum sang Ma Curly-Headed Baby to me. I always remembered the lullaby chorus part, but I was moved to look up the rest of the words when I became a grandad. The song was written by an Aussie over a century ago. The original words contained "nigger" and "coon." The former has typically been replaced by "darkie" and the latter, ridiculously, by "food." To me, it's a song of pleasant sentiment, sung by a plantation mother to her little child. I'm no singer on the whole, but were I to find meself singing it to a bunch of grown-ups I think I'd explain that the words are of their time, and while we wouldn't use those words these days, I'm keeping them in. To a six-month-old, maybe the same but without the wordy justifications. To a four-year-old, I think I'd reconsider, because an explanation would be called for yet difficult to give. The bottom line is whether the song has racist intent and whether it's capable of depraving and corrupting. Personally, I don't feel the need to be sheltered from dated lyrics.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Are racist, but traditional, songs OK?
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 01 Jun 20 - 12:02 PM

Funny you should mention that
My family song was 'Lilac Trees' - an extremely patronising 'white' song about being black - I cringe to think of it now
The song was made by an American Jewish writer and I have no doubt its heart was in the right place - as with 'Curly Headed Babby' Paul Robeson sang it
Jim


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Are racist, but traditional, songs OK?
From: GUEST,BlackAcornUK
Date: 01 Jun 20 - 12:19 PM

I think anyone attempting to sing those lyrics to other adults would - in most contexts - very rightly meet with surprise and strong disapproval. As you note Steve, it would be especially inappropriate to sing it to children.

It's not just about the power of language to deprave or corrupt - these are words with a great history of violence and systematic oppression attached, towards many of our friends and neighbours. They're words that shouldn't be in use now, and to use them casually in a cultural context normalises their use as a slur.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Are racist, but traditional, songs OK?
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 01 Jun 20 - 03:56 PM

I think that people are far more likely to end up depraved and corrupted by the tripe that they hear/sing in religious hymns and brainlessly-chanted prayers. But we tend to give all that a bye. I like the folk process and I enjoy different takes on songs. But I don't regard sanitisation of words that someone thinks might offend me as part of that process. Number one, I'm a grown up, number two, I don't like being patronised, and number three, I have no right to not be offended. I want to hear what the song was intended to be, otherwise I just might not want to hear it at all. I'm not going to turn into a rabid racist because I hear the wonderful Paul Robeson singing "coon" in a song.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Are racist, but traditional, songs OK?
From: GUEST,BlackAcornUK
Date: 01 Jun 20 - 06:21 PM

It’s not about you or what offends you. It’s about a contemporary social contract that spares fellow members of our community from the pain of the glib, cavalier or even - indeed - purposefully offensive wielding of words that are designed at their core to subjugate, ‘other’, and brutalise them. Even if singing in a context with only white attendees, the casual use of such language gives legitimacy to those that would use it in spite. Thankfully, anyone indulging in that sort of repertoire would be denied the opportunity to finish at literally any singaround that I’ve ever been to.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Are racist, but traditional, songs OK?
From: Joe G
Date: 01 Jun 20 - 06:37 PM

Totally agree Black Acorn - it is not for white people (like me or i assume) to determine what may or may not be offensive - we need to avoid the use of any such racist language in songs


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate
Next Page

  Share Thread:
More...


This Thread Is Closed.


Mudcat time: 2 May 1:25 AM EDT

[ Home ]

All original material is copyright © 2022 by the Mudcat Café Music Foundation. All photos, music, images, etc. are copyright © by their rightful owners. Every effort is taken to attribute appropriate copyright to images, content, music, etc. We are not a copyright resource.