BS: Democratic Party Terrorist Organization?

Subject: RE: BS: Democratic Party Terrorist Organization?
From: Bobert
Date: 30 Apr 10 - 07:40 AM

(Knock ir off, Boberdz... Ya' know there is no talkin' music below the line!!!)

Opps... My deepest apologies...

B;~)

Subject: RE: BS: Democratic Party Terrorist Organization?
From: Bobert
Date: 30 Apr 10 - 07:06 AM

Yeah, I do the same.... There was a time in the 60's when I was absolutely terrorized to play "open mic" at the Crossroads Coffee House in Richmond, Va. but ya' gotta start somewhere... I remember those days well so when I do the occasional open mic I remember that somewhere in the joint is probably some kid feeling like I did back then and just wishes it was over so I never go more than 10 or 15 minutes and usually tell folks that exact story before I play... Kinda realxes the youngin's, too, knowing that, hey, we all been there...

I liked that Celtic music... I ain't much on it but I know when somethin' is being done well... I did, however, get into Declan Masterson some about 12-15 years ago... Kinda the Leo Kotkee of the Umbrian Pipes...lol...

B~

Subject: RE: BS: Democratic Party Terrorist Organization?
From: GUEST,Guest from Sanity
Date: 30 Apr 10 - 02:53 AM

Hey, this lass,( friend), when not touring or recording still goes to the local pub, and blows with the folks!!

This one!

Who is here, too

I still pop in and certain 'open mikes.....and blow them away, as well!

GfS

Subject: RE: BS: Democratic Party Terrorist Organization?
From: Bobert
Date: 29 Apr 10 - 09:22 PM

Hey, I play the "Devil's music"... What's God got to do with it...

Awww, jus funnin' wid ya, GfS... I'm kinda like my hero, Son House, in that Saturday night I'm jukin' and carryin' on about all kinds of stuff that the blues is about but Sunday mornin' I'm on my knees askin' fir forgiveness... But I do it anyway...

BTW, I'm sure you'll like this but there are a few stories I like to tell between songs and one goes like this; "Hey, ya'll, a buddy 'o mine in Norway was asked what the blues was all about and after a few seconds of thought he said 'Well, the blues is 99% about women and other natural disaters'"... Yeah, I stick that in every set I play, unless, of course I'm booked to do more than one set at a certain gig...

B~

Subject: RE: BS: Democratic Party Terrorist Organization?
From: GUEST,Guest from Sanity
Date: 29 Apr 10 - 11:02 AM

Bobert: "Play music??? Ahhhhh, yes, this is festival season (no smoke filled beer joints) and I've got Spingfest (Luray, Va.) on the 8th, a large private party (220-300 people) to do back in Harpers Ferry, Wes Ginny on the 15th and opening for The Bush League (no, not George) June 25th... And calls comin' in so....

... yes to gettin' "The Sidewalk Bob Show" cranked the heck up!!!

B~


God Bless you!!!!

GfS

Subject: RE: BS: Democratic Party Terrorist Organization?
From: ichMael
Date: 28 Apr 10 - 11:58 PM

Back to what started this thread. The actions of Heath Shuler, the white congressman who said he heard black congressmen called names, then backed away from his lie as if it was no big thing. From the Christian Science Monitor:

http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/2010/0428/Why-tea-party-defenders-won-t-let-N-word-claims-rest

Unwilling to let charges of racism stand, "tea party" groups continue to challenge claims by members of the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) that protesters hurled the N-word at them 15 times at a "Code Red" protest in the run-up to the health-care reform vote on March 20.

Good for them. Don't let Shuler get away with slander and incitement to riot.

Without hard evidence for either side, the conventional wisdom might be for tea partyers to let the incident slide and to blame the movement's more radical elements. Instead, a group called the Tea Party Federation sent a letter to the CBC on April 26 demanding video or audio corroboration of the accusations.

The burden of proof is on the ones who made the claim, not on the Tea Party, and the accusers can't produce proof. AND they're backing away from their lies.

Already concerned about agents provocateur infiltrating rallies, tea party members say they either want help to ferret out the guilty party – or an apology from congressmen it if turns out they made up the incident to discredit the tea party movement.

Amid at least one poll showing that the public perceives the tea party movement to be at least partially racially biased...

What crap. The public "perceives" racism. The government-controlled media's trying to work the Obama mob into a frenzy. They already have most of you thinking it's okay to infiltrate groups and act as provocateurs, and next will come lynchings of Tea Party members because you "perceive" that they might have done the same to a black person if they got the chance. Bona fide crap.

May's going to be a bad month for Obama with the citizenship thing. Don't join his mobs if his provocateurs try to start diversionary race riots. His buddy Bill Ayers is already out grandstanding with the Brown Berets, and Ayers has SAID he wants race riots in America. Don't fall for it.

Subject: RE: BS: Democratic Party Terrorist Organization?
From: Bobert
Date: 28 Apr 10 - 11:27 AM

Well, to a point I have to agree with you, GfSer... The last Dem prior to Obama I voted for president was Jimmy Carter... I've cast 3 votes for Ralph Nadar, however, and have had my Dem friends put the blast on me for that so I understand ther arguments...

I'm still a Greenie but given the full assault by the right that is going on I am having to at the very least give some attention to some of what *some* of the Fems are saying and there are some decent people with decent thinkerators out there... I am very imnpressed with Sherrod from Ohio and the guy (can't remember his name) who took Biden's seat in the Senate... These are a couple of very reasonable, well intentioned people who sound a little on the Nadadish side...

Play music??? Ahhhhh, yes, this is festival season (no smoke filled beer joints) and I've got Spingfest (Luray, Va.) on the 8th, a large private party (220-300 people) to do back in Harpers Ferry, Wes Ginny on the 15th and opening for The Bush League (no, not George) June 25th... And calls comin' in so....

... yes to gettin' "The Sidewalk Bob Show" cranked the heck up!!!

B~

Subject: RE: BS: Democratic Party Terrorist Organization?
From: GUEST,Guest from Sanity
Date: 28 Apr 10 - 11:07 AM

Bobert: "This entire idea that "Well-Ralph-both-sides-need-to-calm-down" is nothing but Republican PR to justify their collective bad behavior..."

For what its worth, as far back as Ford/Carter presidential election, I had decided to to be affiliated with either party, for the same reason I hold today.......They're NOT working on behalf of the common citizenry!..and of course, I was right then, and right now!

I think this is CLEARLY obvious to those who are tired of rationalizing very destructive politics from both groups of greedy traitors.

By the way, the numbers of people to hold that same opinion is growing exponentially. Once again, Sanity is ahead of the curve! (grinning)

Play music, compose music..and bring the heart back to this people!

GfS

Subject: RE: BS: Democratic Party Terrorist Organization?
From: Bobert
Date: 28 Apr 10 - 07:46 AM

Clear as mud, GfS... Maybe you ougtta check out what alot of Dems are talkin' like... There's plenty of good work being done by some rather dedicated Democrats in both chambers... Whenever I see quotes from Nancy Pelosi being put out there as if she is the only Dem in the world and represents every Dem in the universe I automatically think "right wing blog"...

Plus, I really don't see where the Dems are the ones who are tacitly endorsing "by any means nesessary"... I think it's fair to say that the crybaby Repubs have stooped lockstep to this position... I mean, leaving the House Chamber to egg on spitters, haters, conspircy theorists and the like is a form of terrorism... As the folk who were called "nigger" or spit on... That kinda stuff used to happen in America during some much different times...

This entire idea that "Well-Ralph-both-sides-need-to-calm-down" is nothing but Republican PR to justisfy their collective bad behavior...

B~

Subject: RE: BS: Democratic Party Terrorist Organization?
From: GUEST,Guest from Sanity
Date: 27 Apr 10 - 11:00 PM

First of all I'm NOT a Republican...and I think that should be obvious, by now. I have criticized BOTH political parties for their CORRUPTION!..My past posts should be quite evident.

Now Pelosi said what Pelosi said. McConnell didn't make her say it, I didn't make it up..so you can try to minimize the link by saying it was a McConnell talking point. I don't really care about McConnell anyway. I care about our country, and how the propaganda hides the real agendas, of them both. Meanwhile, our freedoms are being eroded, we're plummeted into debt,..and we, the people have hardly any say, on what is being imposed on us...but we ARE being told WHAT to think, and in that, they, the two parties have us bickering between ourselves while bullshit is being passed, and the government neglects its obligations, to keep us free and safe, within our borders, while the fat cats, at the top, get fatter!

BOTH sides are more concerned about power and control ABOVE the well-being of people our country...and use 'compromise' to move us toward a complete disaster...with the fattest of the fat-cats at the top!...and they don't give a rat's ass about anything but their own WILLS...over the rights, of the people.

Gosh, I hope that's at least reasonably clear to ya'!

GfS

Subject: RE: BS: Democratic Party Terrorist Organization?
From: Bobert
Date: 27 Apr 10 - 07:34 AM

Same answer as above, GfS.... The only thing that has stunned the country is an AWOL (and proud of it) Republican Party... Hey, they have every chance to be part of the process but they refuse... They remind me of two-year-olds having temper tantrums... This is all about just how hurt their feelings are over losing power... It has nothing to do with policy... I mean, the health care reform bill had more of a Republican fingerprint on it than a Democratic yet the Repubs sat in the corner bawling their poor little eyes out???

Yeah, this is the stunning part... Not Dems going ahead with what they have to do... If that means having to get together to work out details, so be it... Why would they be expected to have people in the room who have publicly (and thru their votes) say, "No, thanks, we're mad and we're not going to play"???

And guess what??? At the end of the day Ben Nelson didn't get his way and the Stupack got some language which wasn't, in substance, any different than existing language about federal money not going to pay for abortions... But the Repubs now want to howl over that, too...

Sorry, GfS, but you keep throwing up McConnell talking points which, BTW, goes a long way toward expalining why you were so anti-Obama prior to the election... Duhhhhhh, you seem to be a closet Republican... No offense but if it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck it's a duck...

B~

Subject: RE: BS: Democratic Party Terrorist Organization?
From: akenaton
Date: 27 Apr 10 - 01:49 AM

Aye....Its a good job Sarah didn't say that eh?

They would have burnt her at the stake!

Subject: RE: BS: Democratic Party Terrorist Organization?
From: GUEST,Guerst from Sanity
Date: 27 Apr 10 - 01:20 AM

Yo Bobert, It was bribed through...ie Nebraska special deal, Stupack, bogus executive order, Louisiana 'Purchase'....for starters.....and then there isThis bit of 'transparency' RIGHT BEFORE THE VOTE!

It stunned the country!...that most who voted for it DID NOT EVEN READ IT!!!!!

GfS

Subject: RE: BS: Democratic Party Terrorist Organization?
From: Ebbie
Date: 26 Apr 10 - 10:57 PM

hahahhaha It appears that GfS's mind is muddled. My dear, may I suggest that you meant "root"?

S/he says:
Amos, not only do you just make shit up...you can't spell. GfS 24 Apr 10 - 01:52 PM
And s/he says:
What a thing to route for, eh?? GfS 24 Apr 10 - 08:25 PM


route

–noun
1.
a course, way, or road for passage or travel: What's the shortest route to Boston?
2.
a customary or regular line of passage or travel: a ship on the North Atlantic route.
3.
a specific itinerary, round, or number of stops regularly visited by a person in the performance of his or her work or duty: a newspaper route; a mail carrier's route.
–verb (used with object)
4.
to fix the route of: to route a tour.
5.
to send or forward by a particular route: to route mail to its proper destination.
—Idiom
6.
go the route, Informal.
a.
to see something through to completion: It was a tough assignment, but he went the route.
b.
Baseball. to pitch the complete game: The heat and humidity were intolerable, but the pitcher managed to go the route.
Use route in a Sentence
See images of route
Search route on the Web
Origin:
1175–1225; ME: way, course < OF < L rupta (via) broken (road), fem. ptp. of rumpere to break; cf. rout1

—Related forms
mis·route, verb (used with object),-rout·ed, -rout·ing.
pre·route, verb (used with object),-rout·ed, -rout·ing.
re·route, verb,-rout·ed, -rout·ing.

—Can be confused with:root, rout, route.

Subject: RE: BS: Democratic Party Terrorist Organization?
From: mousethief
Date: 26 Apr 10 - 10:39 PM

True that, Bobert.

Subject: RE: BS: Democratic Party Terrorist Organization?
From: Bobert
Date: 26 Apr 10 - 10:23 PM

Okay, lets make this simple...

What was the date where the Dems went into comittee and didn't ask the Reppubs to join them???

But wait, what was the date that Obama first met with the Repubs about getting their input into the bill???

Oh wait, part 2... How many months transpired between Obama first asking the Repubs for their input and the conferance comittee???

Oh, and just for the record, when did the comittee meet (date wise) after the Repubs voted solidly to fillibuster any debate on the bill???

Seems like the time lines don't jive here with the Repubs trying to look as if they are in the game... Not too sure where they are gettin' their advice these days but, yeah, they will gain in November but they are really blowing a chance to gain big in Novemeber...

Hey, I don't care... Just some stupid politics being played right now by the Repubs... I mean, real stupid... I mean, they are trying to get the swing (moderate) voters with (extreme) legislative behavior??? Just can't figure it out???

B~

Subject: RE: BS: Democratic Party Terrorist Organization?
From: beardedbruce
Date: 26 Apr 10 - 09:42 PM

"Maybe you'd like to tell the good folks how much time was spent proir to a conference to iron out small details"

The Republicans had their changes to the bill killed in Committe, then Reid & Pelosi rewrote the bill, anyway.



"... Maybe you'd like to tell them about how Obama went to the Repubs in the first palce"

Obama said that the Republicans had to comprimise- and agree with the Democrats. If one side wants to spend 20 trillion, and the other side wants to spend nothing, is 15 trillion spent a compramise, or an abdication of fiscal responsibility?



"... Maybe you'd like to tell them how the Repubs left the House chambers and cheered people spitting on Democratic Congressmen... "

And that was AFTER they were LOCKED OUT of the Committee meeting, and told they had to accept Pelosi's version with NO chance to even READ it before the vote



"Maybe you'd like to tell them how many hours of debate had occured prior to that confernece..."

Debate between the various members of the DEMOCRATIC Party. The Republicans were ciut out of all debate, and reduced to making public comments since they could not get into the committee to make comments to Congress.


OK?

Only someone who just dropped in from another planet would believe that the Democrats were interested in a bipartisan bill. IF , as Obama said, the two sides agreed on 80% of the bill, WHY DIDN'T he put it into 5 smaller bills, and PASS 4 of them with support of BOTH parties, THEN argue the points of difference in the 5th??? As it was , the Democrats went against both public opinion and any spirit of compriomise, and, IMO, will pay heavily in the fall election.




I fear far more the reverse pendulum swing caused by the Democratic actions than the damage that will be caused by the Democratic bill.


Which is why the place in NY state, 4 hours from an open section of the Canadian border...

Subject: RE: BS: Democratic Party Terrorist Organization?
From: Bobert
Date: 26 Apr 10 - 07:39 PM

Yo, bruce...

Maybe you'd like to tell the good folks how much time was spent proir to a conference to iron out small details... Maybe you'd like to tell them about how Obama went to the Repubs in the first palce... Maybe you'd like to tell them how the Repubs left the House chambers and cheered people spitting on Democratic Congressmen... Maybe you'd like to tell them how many hours of debate had occured prior to that confernece...

I mean, let's get real here, man...

Only someone who just dropped in from another planet would believe that Repub talking point, which BTW, is utter crap... The Repubs had allready made it clear they weren't going to participate in the legislative process before the conference...

It's kinda like a football player saying he isn't going to play regardless and the coach asking him to suit up???

Waht purpose does it serve...

This is a bogus rebuttal on yer part... Complete and utter crap and not grounded in reality...

Come on, Bruce... You have a better mind than to just parrot Mitch McConnell's talking points...

B~

Subject: RE: BS: Democratic Party Terrorist Organization?
From: beardedbruce
Date: 26 Apr 10 - 07:01 PM

"It was the most debated and negotiated legislation in the last 40 years"


That must be why the Demoicrats locked the Republicans out of the conference room, and even the Democrats "Have to vote for the bill in order to find out what is in it." ( quote from Pelosi)


Sorry, the debate was within the higher levels of the Democratic Party, and the bill was pushed through even after the majority of people in most if nort all polls disapproved of THIS bill- NOTE I DID NOT SAY "Healthcare Reform"- it was this PARTICULAR bill wich was being pushed down our throats that was being objected to, by Republicans, Independents , and many Democrats.

Subject: RE: BS: Democratic Party Terrorist Organization?
From: Bobert
Date: 26 Apr 10 - 06:46 PM

Yo, GfS.... Fir the record, health care reform was not "slammed thru"... It was the most debated and negotiated legislation in the last 40 years... That ***is not*** slamming thru... That is nothing but a pure Repub talking point which you say you are above... Okay maybe you didn't say it but you have implied that you are not a shill for the Republican Party...

B~

Subject: RE: BS: Democratic Party Terrorist Organization?
From: Amos
Date: 26 Apr 10 - 01:26 PM

The direction this country is headed in? Less ruthless, a bit more order, and a playing field in which honest enterprise pays off better than crooked enterprise.

There's the bottom line. The huge robber-baron fortunes of the late 19th C. were stellar examples of great enterprises, but they were also riddled with crookedness and ruthlessness. Ruthlessness in fair competition, bounded by the limits of civil decency is very different than the kind of ruthlessness which stomps on the innocent, such as demonstrated by crooked insurance companies and underhanded military-industrial outfits.

The old adage that some used as a moral guide of not doing anything you wouldn't want your mother to know about only works if your mother was not a crackhead or an alcoholic like Momma Bush, I think. But barring that, it would be a good rule for some of these money-hungry young turks who pour their hearts into bilking the trusting--the Enrons and AIGs of the world.

And a nation as diversified and polarized as this one gets does not have a common standard of morality. Christians often spout moral dictums which are hollow and live lives totally at variance with them; there is no "Good Book" mentality to inform the broad playing field of business. Failing such a core of ethical measurement, regulation is the sole guarantee that some credit card companywill not loop you in to perpetual bondage to usury, etc.

So I think reforming health care and high finance are necessary steps to make the modern American way of life a tad less life-threatening and ensure a broader field of "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness".

Just for example, wouldn't it be a good idea to make ratings outfits answerable to a standard of honesty and transparency on derivative packages being sold to investors?

A

A

Subject: RE: BS: Democratic Party Terrorist Organization?
From: Bobert
Date: 26 Apr 10 - 01:06 PM

The main problem, Don, is that what we have in the country is way too much "garbage in - garbage out" in that most people rely on the media for their information and the media ain't up the task these days so it reports/repeats lies as if they were truths and so the average person really doesn't know squat about too much...

b~

Subject: RE: BS: Democratic Party Terrorist Organization?
From: Don(Wyziwyg)T
Date: 26 Apr 10 - 12:20 PM

"Now, both Amos, and Mouser, that SHOULD BE INDICATIVE of what is wrong, with your assertions. Also Pugh polls show 78% of all Americans think this country is headed in the wrong direction....ever wonder why??.Does that number represent how the will of the people are being ignored???""

They may be right, given that GeeGosh pointed it in that direction and then jammed the steering, but not to worry, in spite of George, Obama will eventually turn it round.

Who knows one day you may all find yourselves living in a country that cares about the poor and the sick, instead of ripping them off, that looks after its weak and old, that keeps its nose out of its neighbours' business. In short a civilised USA.

In 1948 Gandhi said he thought that would be a good idea...........Still Waiting........And Hoping.

The American people, most of them anyway, are individually some of the nicest people I've ever met, and yet, en masse there's this callous self obsession which prompts them to ignore the plight of others worse off than they, and refuse to put effort or cash into helping.

I freely admit that I don't understand it, especially when doing so would save them money long term.

Don T.

Subject: RE: BS: Democratic Party Terrorist Organization?
From: Bobert
Date: 26 Apr 10 - 08:22 AM

Too much legislation is written word for word by lobbiests...

Subject: RE: BS: Democratic Party Terrorist Organization?
From: GUEST,Guest from Sanity
Date: 26 Apr 10 - 01:06 AM

Mouser, Respectfully, I can see you are not familiar with the news, in regarding this vote and what I'm talking about. I'm sure someone would fill you in...but I'm going back to the studio, right now. You'd be shocked!

GfS

Subject: RE: BS: Democratic Party Terrorist Organization?
From: mousethief
Date: 26 Apr 10 - 12:33 AM

Legislation is not based on opinion polls. We are not a direct democracy but a representative democracy. We hire representatives, who then make the laws. If they are legislating against the wishes of their constituents, the constituents' redress is to vote them out of office at the next election. That's how our representative democracy works. But there is nothing in the constitution that requires the representatives to poll their constituents and determine what they want. Why even mention that if your point is that they're not acting democratically? It is a total red herring.

Sweetheart deals for states? This is new? This is newsworthy? This is something only the Democrats do? I agree it's not a good thing. But it's not a stick you can beat the Democrats with.

"Bribing" -- you mean compromise and bartering. Yes that's new too. Ho boy.

"Worthless" executive orders? You mean ones you disagree with, or ones that don't do anything? If the latter, who cares? What harm is done?

We'll see what November brings. Whatever it brings, determining the cause of it won't be as simplistic as you seem to think. Although no doubt we'll have exit polls spun mercilessly by both sides.

Now, just because I posted that, does not mean I'm anti either side or pro either side.

No, of course not. Who would think such a thing?

PS the Democrats have been shut down in the Senate virtually all year by do-nothing Republicans who are bent on nothing but jamming the machinery of Obama's presidency. Your choice of words is humorous.

Subject: RE: BS: Democratic Party Terrorist Organization?
From: GUEST,Guest from Sanity
Date: 26 Apr 10 - 12:11 AM

Mouser: " ...My point is they ARE using the democratic process.."

Is that the same as bribing Congressmen for votes, that was NOT reflective of their constituents?? Sweetheart deals for some states, and not all?...Worthless executive orders??

Now, both Amos, and Mouser, that SHOULD BE INDICATIVE of what is wrong, with your assertions. Also Pugh polls show 78% of all Americans think this country is headed in the wrong direction....ever wonder why??.Does that number represent how the will of the people are being ignored???

Come on, the way the 'Health Care Deform' was rammed through should be obvious to you, to at least admit that this was NOT the will of the people....and polls show that the Democrats are going to be shut down in both the House and Senate, in November....FOR THAT REASON!!

Now, just because I posted that, does not mean I'm anti either side or pro either side. I would certainly prefer that the people are represented by the people who they voted for, and if a bill comes to them, that the MERITS of the bill should get the support, and not bribes, intimidation, sweetheart deals, etc etc.....and YES both sides do it, and one wrong does NOT excuse the other!!

Fair enough???

GfS

Subject: RE: BS: Democratic Party Terrorist Organization?
From: mousethief
Date: 25 Apr 10 - 10:33 PM

Not quite the point I"m trying to make, Bobert. Far From Sanity said, I thought Democrats would be in favor of the Democratic process. My point is they ARE using the democratic process. The truth is FFS just doesn't like what they're doing so he makes up shit about how they're doing it being undemocratic. It's as transparent as a Magritte windowpane.

Subject: RE: BS: Democratic Party Terrorist Organization?
From: Bobert
Date: 25 Apr 10 - 08:23 PM

The "democratic process" that everyone keeps talkin' about is deeply flawed... Between the cost of getting elected and the fillibuster it is on life support, at best...

B~

Subject: RE: BS: Democratic Party Terrorist Organization?
From: mousethief
Date: 25 Apr 10 - 06:21 PM

How is the legislature passing legislation and the president signing it anti-democratic? Are you saying our Constitution's set-up for how to govern the country is undemocratic?

Subject: RE: BS: Democratic Party Terrorist Organization?
From: Don(Wyziwyg)T
Date: 25 Apr 10 - 02:12 PM

""Jeez, I hope not. I'd rather people share ideas, and come to a logical, truthful conclusion...and those who are interested in the truth, would then come to unity......I mean, if you want something to REALLY sing about!""

A logical, truthful conclusion?

As long as it is the same conclusion as yours!.........Elsewise we are all morons?

Go put your foil hat back on. Your brain cell is overheating.

Don T.

Subject: RE: BS: Democratic Party Terrorist Organization?
From: Amos
Date: 25 Apr 10 - 01:58 PM

I see no evidence the administration is governing against the will of the people. Most of the issues Obama and Co. have addressed were either catastrophic leftovers from Bush, or pretty much what he campaigned on, allowing for the slippage of trying to make things happen in reality.

Obama is plugging ahead doing a decent job, generally speaking. People love to get in uproars about one thing or another, but a lot of that is sound and fury, signifying nothing.
I think financial reform, health reform and immigration reform will make the world a better place. Not as much better as I would like, but better.


A

Subject: RE: BS: Democratic Party Terrorist Organization?
From: GUEST,Guest from Sanity
Date: 25 Apr 10 - 01:51 PM

Sawzaw: "Surviving a House censure resolution, Brooks resigned, was immediately reelected, and soon thereafter died at age 37. Sumner recovered slowly and returned to the Senate, where he remained for another 18 years. The nation, suffering from the breakdown of reasoned discourse that this event symbolized, tumbled onward toward the catastrophe of civil war...."

Not unlike the mood of the country, today...fanned by an administration who is governing AGAINST the will of the people. I thought Democrats would be in favor of the Democratic process. This is not what they are about.

By the way, I am adamantly NOT in favor of things reaching a boiling point, to where we have civil unrest...but observing the political wrangling and polarization, divisiveness of Government vs. the people, I can only come to the conclusion, that this must cool down, or we as a nation are headed for a collision.

.....Now, if you needed a topic for something to say in a song...there's one for ya'!!

GfS

Subject: RE: BS: Democratic Party Terrorist Organization?
From: Sawzaw
Date: 25 Apr 10 - 12:32 PM

lambast (beat with a cane)

The Caning of Senator Charles Sumner

....Representative Preston Brooks was Butler's South Carolina kinsman. If he had believed Sumner to be a gentleman, he might have challenged him to a duel. Instead, he chose a light cane of the type used to discipline unruly dogs. Shortly after the Senate had adjourned for the day, Brooks entered the old chamber, where he found Sumner busily attaching his postal frank to copies of his "Crime Against Kansas" [anti-slavery] speech.

Moving quickly, Brooks slammed his metal-topped cane onto the unsuspecting Sumner's head. As Brooks struck again and again, Sumner rose and lurched blindly about the chamber, futilely attempting to protect himself. After a very long minute, it ended.

Bleeding profusely, Sumner was carried away. Brooks walked calmly out of the chamber without being detained by the stunned onlookers. Overnight, both men became heroes in their respective regions.

Surviving a House censure resolution, Brooks resigned, was immediately reelected, and soon thereafter died at age 37. Sumner recovered slowly and returned to the Senate, where he remained for another 18 years. The nation, suffering from the breakdown of reasoned discourse that this event symbolized, tumbled onward toward the catastrophe of civil war....

Subject: RE: BS: Democratic Party Terrorist Organization?
From: GUEST,Guest from Sanity
Date: 24 Apr 10 - 10:19 PM

Amos, you present a GREAT argument!!

Subject: RE: BS: Democratic Party Terrorist Organization?
From: Amos
Date: 24 Apr 10 - 10:02 PM

And off the other wall! And the ceiling! ...


A

Subject: RE: BS: Democratic Party Terrorist Organization?
From: Bobert
Date: 24 Apr 10 - 09:12 PM

Danged!!! I love this place...

Subject: RE: BS: Democratic Party Terrorist Organization?
From: GUEST,Guest from Sanity
Date: 24 Apr 10 - 08:25 PM

But at least not 'Progressive' as in Marxist! Which doesn't work....well, I guess it does if tens of millions have to be killed, in order for it to take over a country, as in Russia or China.....and then you're left with very little personal rights!!! What a thing to route for, eh??

GfS

P.S. But then Russia's economy imploded, and China didn't flourish economically till a bit of good ol' capitalism was allowed.

GfS

Subject: RE: BS: Democratic Party Terrorist Organization?
From: Amos
Date: 24 Apr 10 - 07:42 PM

lambast:


S: (v) cane, flog, lambaste, lambast (beat with a cane)
S: (v) call on the carpet, take to task, rebuke, rag, trounce, reproof, lecture, reprimand, jaw, dress down, call down, scold, chide, berate, bawl out, remonstrate, chew out, chew up, have words, lambaste, lambast (censure severely or angrily) "The mother scolded the child for entering a stranger's car"; "The deputy ragged the Prime Minister"; "The customer dressed down the waiter for bringing cold soup"


Elsewhere it is described as an alternate spelling for lambaste, Miss Snoot.

Ordinary typos I plead guilty to. The rest of your horsefeathers should be put back around your neck where they can serve some purpose.

Your mindless diatribes are wildly off the mark, wildly uncivil, and reek of black anger or demented self-importance.

A

Subject: RE: BS: Democratic Party Terrorist Organization?
From: GUEST,Guest from Sanity
Date: 24 Apr 10 - 07:39 PM

Doug R: "Gee, what a civil thread."

As in 'civil war'?????

Jeez, I hope not. I'd rather people share ideas, and come to a logical, truthful conclusion...and those who are interested in the truth, would then come to unity......I mean, if you want something to REALLY sing about!

GfS

Subject: RE: BS: Democratic Party Terrorist Organization?
From: mousethief
Date: 24 Apr 10 - 06:15 PM

On politics? You're new aren't you?

Subject: RE: BS: Democratic Party Terrorist Organization?
From: DougR
Date: 24 Apr 10 - 05:44 PM

Gee, what a civil thread.

DougR

Subject: RE: BS: Democratic Party Terrorist Organization?
From: mousethief
Date: 24 Apr 10 - 04:59 PM

Ah so you admit you lied.

Subject: RE: BS: Democratic Party Terrorist Organization?
From: GUEST,Guest from Sanity
Date: 24 Apr 10 - 01:52 PM

Amos, not only do you just make shit up...you can't spell. To quote you, in regards to that..."You get so heated and histrionic in your righteous condemnation that you lose a good deal of accuracy, and any trace of relative civility. This makes you more a moron than those you seek to lambast." .....and it's lambaste..'share' is not, "sahre."...and the charge was not to.."everyone on this forum into one generality and accusing it of all kinds of wild ideas"....but then YOU'RE the one who replied. Do your ears always perk up, when you hear the words 'moron', and 'nitwit'....then come running?

Stick to music. That's where you're talented!


As for overturning Bush's stuff...not the ones that mattered, as far as making the executive branch out of balance of powers.


GfS

Subject: RE: BS: Democratic Party Terrorist Organization?
From: Amos
Date: 24 Apr 10 - 12:44 PM

The moronic element here, GfS, is that you are painting everyone on this forum into one generality and accusing it of all kinds of wild ideas which many of us do not sahre. You get so heated and histrionic in your righteous condemnation that you lose a good deal of accuracy, and any trace of relative civility. This makes you more a moron than those you seek to lambast.

A

Subject: RE: BS: Democratic Party Terrorist Organization?
From: mousethief
Date: 24 Apr 10 - 12:41 PM

Um, Obama overturned a LOT of Bush's executive orders in his first 100 days.

Subject: RE: BS: Democratic Party Terrorist Organization?
From: GUEST,Guest from Sanity
Date: 24 Apr 10 - 12:24 PM

When are you morons going to quit blaming Bush for EVERYTHING, as an excuse to continue the same policies???..just under a guy who appeals to the other side of the political spectrum??????
Unfortunately, you don't see, that the executive orders that Bush heaped on the executive branch(which were unconstitutional, by the way), and which I pointed out to you all, during the 'election', Obama never repealed!!...but you sure bitched about Bush putting them into effect, when he did it!!!

Now, instead of just re-acting...think about that, for a minute, and think about how this current band of tyrants, now want to screw with our freedom of speech(even on the internet). Remember in the 60's how it was 'Power to the People'?...You think that people have more power now??? You've got to be kidding yourself!!!! We've got the fucking government invading every nano-detail of our lives, and you nitwits keep routing them on!!!!

Bush was wrong, Obama is wrong, Bush Sr. was wrong, Clinton was wrong..and in their bullshit, this nation is eating shit...and you just want them to heap some gravy on it.

Meanwhile, Iran is a sworn, crazy enemy of the west, and pursuing nukes, and you guys think that the Tea Party, the Republicans, and as the thread is titled, the Democrats, are the 'Terrorists'????? Hmmm, sounds like 'Divide and Conquer' to me...and you just keep driving in the wedges, in the name of God only knows what insanity drives you!!!!!

Meanwhile, our borders are porous, to a lot more than just Mexicans, and you guys try to make a 'civil rights' issue of it. Buddy, we're being invaded by a lot more than 'illegal immigrants' looking for welfare or tax free money to send home!

Yes, right wing and left wing are on the same bird, and we're getting the crap kicked out of us!

You might smoke your pot, and think of some ethereal folk song lick on your axe, to lull you into a stupor, but there are those in the world who would love to destroy America, both within and without, and are driven to do so. Hey, have another hit. Maybe you can score and charge it on your credit card!!

GfS

Subject: RE: BS: Democratic Party Terrorist Organization?
From: Don(Wyziwyg)T
Date: 24 Apr 10 - 04:03 AM

""Imagine if George did ANY one of those things!""

George did a lot worse things than that, and you expect Obama to unravel the mess George left him in just one year.

Who were you confusing him with,.....SUPERMAN?

Don T.

Subject: RE: BS: Democratic Party Terrorist Organization?
From: GUEST,Guest from Sanity
Date: 24 Apr 10 - 12:07 AM

Bush Schmush! Obama did what George couldn't.....like offshore drilling, taking over GM, not closing Guantanamo, and not getting a lot of flack for it, passing a bill to FORCE Americans to buy health insurance from the insurance corporations, bailing out Wall Street, giving away TRILLIONS of OUR tax money to his cronies....shit! name it!
He's a better Bush, than Bush!....and all while being applauded by the 'left'!!!!!!!!!!
Imagine if George did ANY one of those things!!

GfS

Subject: RE: BS: Democratic Party Terrorist Organization?
From: Bobert
Date: 23 Apr 10 - 10:10 PM

TARP??? Wasn't that Bush's???

But nevermind that... Yeah, I am concerned when Obama goes to Wall Street to supposedly read them the riot act and the next day the stocks go up???

For those of you you have been callin' Obmaa a "liberal" or "socialist", ahhhhhh, seems that those labels might have been premature...

Right now, he's very much a Nixon Republican... If that's liberal or socialist then so be it... No leftie here... Okay, he does write leftie and shoots baskettball with his left hand... That's about a far left as the guy is...

B~