BS: Boobs or bottoms

Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms
From: Peace
Date: 21 Feb 05 - 06:48 PM

Did you say . . .

the G word?

Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms
From: Layah
Date: 21 Feb 05 - 06:37 PM

GUEST is always causing trouble around here. Whenever anything happens, it's always GUEST's fault. Is he/she really that bad, or just a convenient scapegoat?   =)

Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms
From: Peace
Date: 21 Feb 05 - 06:34 PM

It was GUEST. Seriously.

Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms
From: Bunnahabhain
Date: 21 Feb 05 - 06:32 PM

OK, who taught Brucie to make links? None of you are leaving here until the guilty party owns up. Come on, I know it's one of you, and he's been pestering us for weeks with them. You'll be sent to your rooms without dinner until I get an answer....

Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms
From: Peace
Date: 21 Feb 05 - 06:03 PM

Yrglsetucrdel

Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms
From: GUEST
Date: 21 Feb 05 - 06:01 PM

Ommmmmmmmmmmmmm!

Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms
From: Layah
Date: 21 Feb 05 - 06:00 PM

Peter, you didn't say anything wrong. I'm just attempting to be funny, and hopefully not failing too miserably.

Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms
From: Peace
Date: 21 Feb 05 - 06:00 PM

Ummmmmmmmmmmm

Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms
From: Peace
Date: 21 Feb 05 - 05:58 PM

Ommmmmmmmmmmmmm

Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms
From: GUEST,Peter Woodruff
Date: 21 Feb 05 - 05:32 PM

Layah,
   Did I say anything wrong? I was just responding to this thread.

Peter

We need to talk

Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms
From: Layah
Date: 21 Feb 05 - 05:22 PM

Haha, I was wondering how long this thread could remain sidetracked. 5 posts, not bad considering people were distracted from boobs and butts with spring discussions.

Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms
From: GUEST,Peter Woodruff
Date: 21 Feb 05 - 04:38 PM

Although "fat-bottomed girls make the world go 'round," friday is "Bounce Your Boobies" day on Air America Radio's Randi Rhodes Show. If you see it on radio, you see what you really want to see.

Peter

Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms
From: Liz the Squeak
Date: 21 Feb 05 - 04:23 PM

Winter starts on Dec 21st, Spring starts in March and lasts until 1st May, the first day of summer.. Midsummer is June, autumn is September - December.

I've got 10 different flowers blooming in my garden at the moment, including a rose, a snowdrop, the holly, rosemary and periwinkle... so relying on which flower is out to give you a season isn't sensible.

LTS

Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms
From: Layah
Date: 21 Feb 05 - 03:28 PM

Well, I don't specifically recognize any particular types of flowers, but the ones I see now I saw about the second week of January, so I figured they don't count as a sign of spring. Unless spring starts in January? Not that I mind snow, it's the cold without the snow I don't like. I thought it was getting warmer last week, but it did not last.

Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms
From: Davetnova
Date: 21 Feb 05 - 03:21 PM

Layah - Look again. Snowdrops are out, crocuses are starting Spring is here!

Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms
From: Layah
Date: 21 Feb 05 - 03:06 PM

I'd like to hear more about this coming of spring. Back home in California we don't particularly get winter, so spring isn't very noticable. Here in Edinburgh it snowed today (Yay!). Neither of these experiences have given me any indication of what the coming of spring might look like. I always thought winter took place in between Chirstmas and New Years. Here it is the end of February and it still looks like winter to me.

Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms
From: beadie
Date: 21 Feb 05 - 02:30 PM

While it is true that "wandering eyes" seems to be a year-round problem to one degree or another, it is made more evident (and problematic) in Spring here in the northern latitudes.

Warmer weather and the resulting tendency of folks to don less camoflaging outerwear improve the ogle factor by an enormous amount. The ladies' renewed sense of freedom brought on by the coming of Spring allows us to recall that all of these delightful shapes really are still there, they have only been hidden under parkas and overcoats and cable-knit sweaters for the last three or four months.

Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms
From: Layah
Date: 21 Feb 05 - 11:31 AM

I think two pounds of unattached would neither look nor feel good, even if they had nipples on. There's the important matter of being attached to a woman (a living one at that) covered in skin, all that kind of stuff. I mean otherwise you could acheive that with a few sticks of butter and a nipple. God that sounds disgusting.

Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms
From: GUEST,jealous
Date: 21 Feb 05 - 10:15 AM

If men had boobs they would be playing with then all day.

Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms
From: GUEST,Erectile
Date: 21 Feb 05 - 10:14 AM

A well formed pair of boobs is a gateway of pleasure

Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms
From: Bunnahabhain
Date: 21 Feb 05 - 08:49 AM

Cluin, you're wrong...

NotHow do you make 2 lbs of fat look good?

But How do you make 2 lbs of fat feel good?






Put a nipple on it.

Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms
From: GUEST,Mr Red with the Booby Prize
Date: 21 Feb 05 - 05:30 AM

Front bottoms or bottoms?

If there is a mind to look into, the EYES have it.

Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms
From: Cluin
Date: 21 Feb 05 - 03:13 AM

How do you make 2 lbs of fat look good?





Put a nipple on it.

Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms
From: Liz the Squeak
Date: 20 Feb 05 - 05:27 PM

Spring is here, Suhpring is here... life is skittles, life is beer.....

LTS

Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms
From: chazkratz
Date: 20 Feb 05 - 05:26 PM

Seems like you guys have had your eyes shut for the last decade or so: what I find impossible to ignore is what's between a short T-shirt and low cut jeans. What a relief retirement from teaching has been!

--seed

Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms
From: Bunnahabhain
Date: 20 Feb 05 - 05:24 PM

I'd thought of that, but spring sounds like a name for an animal, rather than a person, and I really didn't want to go there...

Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms
From: Peace
Date: 20 Feb 05 - 05:14 PM

Springs may have been the next-door neighbour, no?

Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms
From: Bunnahabhain
Date: 20 Feb 05 - 05:09 PM

Except Summer when sunglasses will cover a mulitude of sins...
100

Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms
From: Bunnahabhain
Date: 20 Feb 05 - 05:08 PM

But to return the thread to the gutter, where it belongs.

BTW, did anyone read the first sentance in this thread?

Springs here and my eyes won't look where they are told.

Spring is here? Could have fooled me...
And eyes not looking where they're told, isn't that a year round problem?

Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms
From: Peace
Date: 20 Feb 05 - 05:06 PM

No point falling in love with boobs or bottoms. There is more to female people than that. (Well, more to MOST female people than that.) If there isn't, the union will fall apart when gravity takes its toll--as gravity always does.

Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms
From: Bunnahabhain
Date: 20 Feb 05 - 05:00 PM

You don't want to be dragging opera into this. There, you meet someone, fall in love within a few seconds, sing about it alot and then one of the following will happen.

They turn out to be you long lost brother/sister.

They're about to be sent to to the army/a nunnery etc.

They turn out to be a God playing silly buggers.

They turn out to be a member of the same sex as you, playing silly buggers.

They're a normal person, except some God, witch, etc is plying silly buggers with them.


Unless of course, one of the above happens to you instead....

Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms
From: Micca
Date: 20 Feb 05 - 12:48 PM

This reminds one of the line in "the Rose of Allandale"

" One Maidenform withstood the storm..." obviously a Valkeries bra

Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms
From: GUEST,Joe_F
Date: 20 Feb 05 - 09:47 AM

"The female body, even at its best, is very defective in form; it has harsh curves and very clumsily distributed masses; compared to it the average milk-jug, or even cuspidor, is a thing of intelligent and gratifying design.... Below the neck by the bow and below the waist astern are two masses that simply refuse to fit into a balanced composition. Viewed from the side, a woman presents an exaggerated S bisected by an imperfect straight line, and so she inevitably suggests a drunken dollar-mark." -- H. L. Mencken, _In Defense of Women_ (1922)

*

First mouse: "Hey, look at the ass on that female over there." Second mouse: "Doesn't do anything for me -- I'm a titmouse."

--- Joe Fineman    [e-mail]

||: Worse is one kind of different. :||

Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms
From: The Fooles Troupe
Date: 20 Feb 05 - 07:34 AM

U U ( @ Y @ ) ! U U ( @ Y @ ) ! U U ! U U ! U U !!!

Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms
From: LadyJean
Date: 19 Feb 05 - 11:24 PM

I do like to see a man with nice, firm, well formed buns.
I do not like to see a man with boobs.

Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms
From: GUEST,888
Date: 19 Feb 05 - 09:18 PM

Love those Swedish sites.

Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms
From: beardedbruce
Date: 19 Feb 05 - 07:04 PM

Mick is, of course, correct in his answer.

Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms
From: GUEST,Ass
Date: 19 Feb 05 - 06:52 PM

Fundamentally...

Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms
From: Liz the Squeak
Date: 19 Feb 05 - 06:14 PM

Kendall are we talking top of head or bottom of head?

LTS

Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms
From: kendall
Date: 19 Feb 05 - 08:05 AM

If you want to get down to the makeup of a boob and call it a lump of fat, let's consider how much money and time is wasted on a growth of dead protein sticking out of your head.

Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms
From: Blissfully Ignorant
Date: 19 Feb 05 - 07:17 AM

( @ Y @ ) ( @ Y @ ) ( @ Y @ ) ( @ Y @ ) ( @ Y @ ) ( @ Y @ ) !

Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms
From: gnu
Date: 19 Feb 05 - 06:05 AM

Sooo, you like tits.

Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms
From: JohnInKansas
Date: 19 Feb 05 - 05:31 AM

alinact -

One prominent "mental therapist" who's name I don't recall remarked on not being able to understand why men get so excited over "what basically is an overdeveloped sweat gland."

All I can comment is that in this case I'm very much in favor of the development, and I've often seen it very nicely done. I see no negative environmental impact, and many positive societal benefits in most cases. While many instances could likely benefit from my close and personal examination of the underlying structural bases, and fuller exploration of the fundamental design integrity, the achievement of the individual artists merits and receives my respect and appreciation.

John

Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms
From: Terry K
Date: 19 Feb 05 - 05:09 AM

her legs are not the only thing I like but they go a long way towards it

boom boom

Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms
From: allanwill
Date: 18 Feb 05 - 08:34 PM

Someone once asked why men get so excited over two lumps of fat with a bit of gristle on top.

Allan

Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms
From: Big Mick
Date: 18 Feb 05 - 08:24 PM

To answer the original question: Yes.

Mick

Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms
From: The Fooles Troupe
Date: 18 Feb 05 - 08:19 PM

What's that you said? A hard WHAT! at the orifice?

Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms
From: GUEST,Klink
Date: 18 Feb 05 - 08:10 PM

Just had a hard day at the orifice.

Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms
From: kendall
Date: 18 Feb 05 - 08:02 PM

Seriously, I think the most beautiful form in all of nature is the bosom of an attractive woman.

Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms
From: LilyFestre
Date: 18 Feb 05 - 07:54 PM

LOL....funny thread! I'm with CatsPHiddle on this one....I like thighs....strong, muscular thighs! *G*

Michelle

PS. There's so much more that makes a body attractive to me but since we are talking physical stuff....it's the eyes and the thighs!