Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple From: Donuel Date: 30 Aug 23 - 08:39 AM Speaking of spiders there was one year here that favored spiders above all. Everything was covered in webs and wolf spiders grew to three inches and could jump a meter at a time. Of course, people outnumber cats. Perhaps the Phoenix lights were lower in the atmosphere than telescopes could see at such an angle. |
Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple From: Donuel Date: 30 Aug 23 - 08:08 AM How could all 48 powerful telescopes, including the Vatican telescope and binocular telescope All in Arizona, not see the Phoenix lights? |
Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple From: Steve Shaw Date: 30 Aug 23 - 06:44 AM There are plenty of insects that are predators that far outnumber cats. And there are probably hundreds of thousands of spiders in my garden alone. |
Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple From: Donuel Date: 30 Aug 23 - 06:39 AM What normal people say compared to Moggus and Felix casts an aspersion on the Abbynormal. With 750 million Felis catus worldwide, by number they are the most successful predators. |
Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple From: MaJoC the Filk Date: 29 Aug 23 - 03:06 PM > Felis catus [...] Normal people go with house cat. I prefer Moggus domesticus, so ner. More over in the proper thread. |
Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple From: Donuel Date: 29 Aug 23 - 01:31 PM https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2023/08/29/metallic-spheres-interstellar-origin-avi-loeb-finds/70699783007/ |
Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple From: Donuel Date: 28 Aug 23 - 06:02 PM More trivia; Turkey has the most sympathetic cat protection laws for their kitties in the world. 10,000 years ago immigrants to Cyprus brought their cats with them by boat. Egypt had an unfortunate fad of mummifying their cats along with family members. Cats have adapted differently in different countries to blend with different cultures. |
Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple From: Donuel Date: 28 Aug 23 - 05:01 PM I find cats have an amazing quality of empathy. They have adapted to be part of the human family with their protection of our grains against rodents. |
Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple From: Charmion Date: 28 Aug 23 - 12:17 PM Humans normally have 33 vertebrae, Donuel. And the Latin name for the domestic cat is Felis catus -- note both spelling and capitalization. Normal people go with "house cat". |
Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple From: Donuel Date: 28 Aug 23 - 11:43 AM If whales have 37 to 81 vertebrae how many do we have? |
Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple From: Donuel Date: 28 Aug 23 - 11:35 AM What animal has more vertebrae than a giraffe? A Felix Catus. |
Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple From: Dave the Gnome Date: 28 Aug 23 - 10:30 AM Why do Lemon and Pineapple deserve capital letters at the front but mint does not? :-D I have no idea what a QUESTION COMPETITION ORGY is. I tried Googling it. Bad mistake... |
Subject: RE: BS: KISS simple QUESTIONS From: Donuel Date: 28 Aug 23 - 10:24 AM Something anyone can do is join a QUESTION COMPETITION ORGY ! answers are optional and not required. For example why do many diverse plants have the specific aroma or taste of Lemon, Pineapple, or mint? |
Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple From: Dave the Gnome Date: 28 Aug 23 - 10:13 AM Starting with Plato science has been a philosophy And in between religion stepped in and screwed the lot. Only science is, well, scientific. A theory may start as imagination but it is hard work, fact checking, testing and peer reviews that make it more realistic. Explaining theories as being either philosophical or the work of god is the lazy persons way out. |
Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple From: Donuel Date: 28 Aug 23 - 10:10 AM You may have been led to believe that you are merely average. I don't care who you are but you have the potential to be PHENOMENAL, see something phenomenal or encounter something/someone phenomenal. Its better to look for yourself than follow a crowd. The Universe does play dice and sometimes gives a great notion. |
Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple From: Donuel Date: 28 Aug 23 - 09:39 AM I don't like when people say science is the new religion. While ancient religion does have some metaphorical truths that are shared with science, much of religion is nonsense or the obvious. Nonintuitive conclusions in science may look like nonsense but there can be much more to it. Nonsense has the potential to lead to more concrete ideas but has a low success rate. |
Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple From: Steve Shaw Date: 28 Aug 23 - 09:36 AM "As another amateur science enthusiast, I show others the weakness of the past status quo and might inspire others how by simply thinking, anyone can make breakthroughs." The unjustified outburst of ego there is simply staggering. |
Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple From: Donuel Date: 28 Aug 23 - 09:24 AM Starting with Plato science has been a philosophy. By the time of Isaac Newton, there was a philosophy of physics. Panpsychism is a philosophy of science and is gaining more favor in the last decade. It may be a hard pill to swallow but despite all our human discoveries and fact-finding, it is nearly zero compared to the unknown and potentially unknowable. we need everyone's input and imagination. The accidental discoveries are numerous. |
Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple From: Donuel Date: 28 Aug 23 - 09:10 AM Correction: "The trolling of this thread 'HAS' helped the spirit of this thread and its potential" The pushback has required that I either make ideas more concise or relatable. We ALL have a measure of knowledge and ignorance. Get used to it. |
Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple From: Dave the Gnome Date: 28 Aug 23 - 09:00 AM Believe it or not, Don, that is a bit better. It shows us a little of how you think. We may disagree but at least you have tried to to explain that your theories started in amateur science and have gone on to pan-psychic theories, which are not science at all. What you still fail to do is acknowledge that many of your past proclamations are not science either but more related to the philosophy of conciousness. And, again, at least you say that something MAY be on the horizon. Theories are fine but not facts. The last personal attack does let you down somewhat though. |
Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple From: Donuel Date: 28 Aug 23 - 08:52 AM Free thought is a deviation from a structured lining up of dominos. New ideas and invention has never been a linear process, read Connections. I understand maybe 3 grand ideas of Einstein and how he simply arrived at those new notions. Even he did not see all the ramifications of his ideas nor did he do all the math to prove them. If you are looking for a simple explanation of everything you too will be as disappointed as Dave. I have NEVER called anyone stupid although it is helpful to answer stupid questions because it takes prior knowledge to learn something new. The trolling of this thread has not helped the spirit of this thread or its potential but it has not defeated curiosity. The trolling is as natural as quantum variation. Science be it accurate, false or general has affected civilization be it Evolution, Eugenics, or Relativity. It is critical to your present and future. |
Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple From: Donuel Date: 28 Aug 23 - 08:16 AM As another amateur science enthusiast, I show others the weakness of the past status quo and might inspire others how by simply thinking, anyone can make breakthroughs. Amos had his science thread and was piqued that I did not source everything. A new idea is hard to footnote. Having just two or three lucky speculations is not a lot but it shows anyone can successfully think. To be fair it's best to have started as a child be it golf, music, or science. I started with the standard model and the symmetry theory which are reductionist and materialistic models of reality. I am up to the description of pan-psychic theories which include the nature of consciousness. Energy generation alternatives are a benefit to us all. There may be something beyond fusion that is on our horizon. I know a couple guys who won't find them. |
Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple From: Dave the Gnome Date: 28 Aug 23 - 07:58 AM See what I mean? Don, I understand physics and many other things at many levels. What I don't understand is your opinion on science. The 900+ posts in this thread seem to indicate that you are incapable of explaining what you think and why you come to those conclusions. Instead of rational explanation you either just cut and paste someone else's theories or resort to personal abuse. This became obvious after the first couple of hundred posts. The more you do it, the more you show yourself up to be a self aggrandising phoney. |
Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple From: Donuel Date: 28 Aug 23 - 07:11 AM Keeping things simple is an effort to dumb things down for understanding. Dave getting your physics from movies like the Flash will be more entertaining for you. |
Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple From: Dave the Gnome Date: 28 Aug 23 - 04:28 AM It's the deviation from the thread title that gets me. The opening post was addressed to me specifically and promised to simplify his arcane ramblings. It has failed to achieve that object quite spectacularly. It has become a platform for said ramblings and not only explains nothing but tries to imply that I am stupid because I do not understand the workings of his weird mind. Still, it does achieve a couple of things. Firstly, it reassures me that it is not just me that has no idea what he is on about half the time and, secondly, it keeps all the shite he spouts in one place :-) |
Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple From: Steve Shaw Date: 27 Aug 23 - 07:53 PM You can't do anything accurately. Now the thing is that you are attempting (usually unsuccessfully) to address matters of science in this thread. It seems never to have occurred to you that, in any discussion of a scientific matter, it's vitally important to use scientifically accurate language which will communicate ideas clearly and without ambiguity. Time and time again you show that you are incapable of doing that. Sad, really. |
Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple From: Donuel Date: 27 Aug 23 - 06:34 PM When Avi Loeb announces his interstellar debris find you will be incensed at the further allusions. Steve is linear in the sense he thinks in terms of wrong or right, black or white, win or lose, genius or idiot. A more accurate distinction is that we have entirely different consciousnesses. |
Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple From: Steve Shaw Date: 27 Aug 23 - 09:25 AM Interstellar is a vague term which simply means "among (or between if you must) the stars." If you mean "outside the heliopause" you need to say just that. I'm "inside" the heliopause (i.e., I'm under the influence of the sun-related things that stop influencing me when I go beyond it), but I'm not part of, or in or on, the sun, therefore I'm interstellar if I want to put it that way. It simply isn't a scientific term unless qualified. It's a nice word though, as are helicopter and mellifluous. Musk and Branson may be able to help you one day. |
Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple From: Donuel Date: 27 Aug 23 - 09:09 AM You failed the test. Iron is the last element that causes the star to collapse and initiate the production of the heaviest elements from the pressure of the final collapse which then explodes in a Nova. |
Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple From: Donuel Date: 26 Aug 23 - 06:42 PM The most common elements, like carbon and nitrogen, are created in the cores of most stars, fused from lighter elements like hydrogen and helium. Super Novas make the heaviest elements, like zinc, silver, tin, gold, mercury, lead and uranium. Iron, however, ends the production process and doesn't fuse into different elements. element creation |
Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple From: Steve Shaw Date: 26 Aug 23 - 03:33 PM Yeah. Discuss. |
Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple From: Donuel Date: 26 Aug 23 - 02:06 PM The heavy elements are from exploded distant stars. You might have some on your finger. |
Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple From: Donuel Date: 26 Aug 23 - 02:01 PM Believe it or not, we are from our Solar system, including meteors, comets, and asteroids. Interstellar objects are far more rare. |
Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple From: Steve Shaw Date: 26 Aug 23 - 01:30 PM We're all interstellar objects. |
Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple From: Donuel Date: 26 Aug 23 - 01:18 PM Avi LOEB will announce his findings regarding an interstellar object that crashed into Earth this coming week. |
Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple From: Donuel Date: 26 Aug 23 - 12:45 PM Speculation about UFO energy sources has gone on since the 40s. Bigalow Aerodynamics has claimed we have working prototypes of our own. |
Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple From: Donuel Date: 24 Aug 23 - 02:37 PM I bet there is that much magnitude of energy between our lab results and the mile-wide Phoenix lights craft. |
Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple From: MaJoC the Filk Date: 24 Aug 23 - 10:44 AM On one of my infrequent visits back into town, I'll have to check with a genuine physicist whether there's still a debate about the difference between predicted and measured zero-point energy. The last time I heard, it was around 120 orders of magnitude, which is even bigger than the gap between real life and Truth Social. .... I'll step aside from this thread awhile. It's full of infrared herrings: all heat and no enlightenment. |
Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple From: Donuel Date: 24 Aug 23 - 09:57 AM Worthy of repetition There is a societal erosion of trust in science, government, old knowledge, and new knowledge. The Sea of nature will devour solid rock at the interface of land and sea. Nature will endure while our opinions will turn to sand. Even the Sea WILL boil away. What will be will be. When I was just a little girl I asked my mother, what will I be Will I be pretty? Will I be rich? Here's what she said to me Qué será, será Whatever will be, will be The future's not ours to see Qué será, será What will be, will be When I grew up and fell in love I asked my sweetheart what lies ahead? Will we have rainbows day after day? Here's what my sweetheart said Qué será, será Whatever will be, will be The future's not ours to see Qué será, será What will be, will be Now I have children of my own They ask their mother, what will I be Will I be handsome? Will I be rich? I tell them tenderly Qué será, será Whatever will be, will be The future's not ours to see Qué será, será What will be, will be Qué será, sera goodbye Gorden Lightfoot your songs were better |
Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple From: Donuel Date: 24 Aug 23 - 09:27 AM Inevitable phase shifts of a universe always go to a lower energy state due to entropy. The fate of a universe may be a cold dark place where even black holes have evaporated after an eternity, leaving only a quantum field of energy.. OR- It could be a BIG RIP where everything is reduced to a different lower energy state. |
Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple From: Steve Shaw Date: 24 Aug 23 - 09:20 AM Eternity mean infinite, endless. It means "a very long time" only in casual, informal usage, as in "Gosh, I seem to have been waiting for this bus for an absolute eternity." Scientific expression avoids that kind of usage. See if you can also manage that. |
Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple From: Donuel Date: 24 Aug 23 - 09:10 AM Most modern physicists believe that it is extremely unlikely for humanity to extract usable energy from zero-point energy. While scientists have been able to generate force using zero-point energy, there is yet to be a widely accepted method to generate more energy than is put into a system. However, physicists have been wrong before. By the way, Everything is finite but eternaties are a very long time. |
Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple From: Donuel Date: 24 Aug 23 - 09:02 AM But who cares, none of us remember our own birthday or embryonic development. It is more relevant to humans to unravel the energy production of UFOs and its benefits for Earth's energy needs. |
Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple From: Steve Shaw Date: 24 Aug 23 - 08:52 AM Finite eternity? Bwahahaha! |
Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple From: Donuel Date: 24 Aug 23 - 08:34 AM As I have said before the density of the early Universe held back light much like an immense black hole. That it did so for a finite eternity, I estimated about 14 billion years before the light was released based on Webb observations of an early Universe with heavy elements, black holes and organized galaxies. |
Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple From: Donuel Date: 24 Aug 23 - 07:25 AM Remember I have always thought inflation theory was bogus and is practically magical thinking. |
Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple From: Donuel Date: 24 Aug 23 - 07:07 AM I would rather have a fast and loose mind than one like yours that stinks and offers nothing. |
Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple From: Steve Shaw Date: 23 Aug 23 - 08:07 PM You don't know that, and you play fast and loose with the concept of "eternity." Bullshit, in other words. As ever. |
Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple From: Donuel Date: 23 Aug 23 - 08:01 PM We can no longer speak with any sort of knowledge or confidence as to how — or even whether — the universe itself began. By the very nature of inflation, it wipes out any information that came before the final few moments: where it ended and gave rise to our hot Big Bang. Inflation could have gone on for an eternity, it could have been preceded by some other nonsingular phase, or it could have been preceded by a phase that did emerge from a singularity. Until the day comes where we discover how to extract more information from the universe than presently seems possible, we have no choice but to face our ignorance. The Big Bang still happened a very long time ago, but it wasn’t the beginning we once supposed it to be. |
Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple From: Donuel Date: 21 Aug 23 - 09:25 PM This is the argument espoused by Dr. Steven Greer which is all well and good if only he could produce even one prototype of suppressed new technology and post it as open-source data for others to reproduce. |