BS: KISS keep it simple

Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple
From: Donuel
Date: 21 Aug 23 - 04:44 PM

There will be those who do not believe they were lied to or the extent that the industrial complex has gone to line their wallets by exploiting 100 year old technology. There is still hope for another 15 years but without the truth we will have gone over the cliff.

Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple
From: Donuel
Date: 21 Aug 23 - 04:42 PM

Many of the exsponged technologies are electromagnetic generators but a few rely upon the pervasive energy wave foundation of the quantum.

The fossil fuel petro dollar has duped the entire world while denying the damage and alternatives they have killed.

Alternatives have been around since 1902 and great advancements since the late 40's. The cold war era made those in charge so paranoid while at the same time so greedy that holding back progress for great profit became irresisable. We are seeing the earth wounding outcome of the great duping of the world for profit.

Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple
From: Donuel
Date: 21 Aug 23 - 04:40 PM

I have saved the most controversial for last.
We have heard :Beware of the military industrial government complex.
The industry is fossil fuels for the last hundred years. Even our nuclear plants are just poisonous steam engines.
New technologies have been put on the black shelf since JP Morgan said
"If I can't put a meter on it, we can't use it."

Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple
From: Donuel
Date: 19 Aug 23 - 05:29 PM

...I mean spin...

Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple
From: Donuel
Date: 19 Aug 23 - 04:56 PM

While yours is a specific true remark, I think the remark was simply about his doubt regarding quantum mechanics.
Now we actually see entanglement charge changes. ALL possible paths are fully accepted quantum actions. Random crap happens.

Simplification has its risks and benefits.

Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple
From: MaJoC the Filk
Date: 19 Aug 23 - 01:08 PM

I understood that the full remark was "God does not throw dice where we cannot see them", and that Einstein was at the time trying to refute the idea of "hidden variables" as an explanation of quantum randomness, but I may have been misinformed. This all rates its own section in the Wikipedia page on hidden-variable theory.

Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 19 Aug 23 - 12:44 PM

Just keeping up with the Jokes's

Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 19 Aug 23 - 12:02 PM

Currently the joke thread and the KISS thread have exactly the same number of posts! I'm sure Don will find some significance

Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple
From: Donuel
Date: 19 Aug 23 - 09:09 AM

The Mysteries of the Universe from our perspective is consciousness and the Universe itself. Since we are made from the Universe and are conscious, it is as though we are a tiny fractal of the larger fractal of reality. Some other ideas that may be beyond our understanding is what are the physics inside a black hole or what happens to physics that is smaller than a Plank length. Reality to some is too weird for humans to understand. Emmanuel Kant said we Can't understand because we are bound by causality and our unique evolutionary adaptation. I think we can still do the best we can when we include new ways of thinking and happy accidents. Of course, correlation is seldom an explanation and status quo thinking does not reveal new truths. Those without curiosity are dead to the future.

Our Universe is composed of various waves of energy interacting with fields. A wave is a process that expresses itself over time and space.
The old idea that atoms are like inanimate billiard balls is an outmoded fiction. The sterile notions of a mechanized universe is going out of favor. Instead, we are looking at pan-psychism in the same way Plato would. Albert Einstein did not like the idea of god playing dice with the universe but life itself encounters randomness.

Mending/removing fences between philosophy, religion and science is a worthwhile pursuit.

Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple
From: Donuel
Date: 18 Aug 23 - 05:26 PM

In conclusion, the Universe is not a sterile inanimate machine as proposed by materialists and reductionists. This will be a lengthy post that will deal with science and the opposing camps of thought.
bbl

Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple
From: Donuel
Date: 15 Aug 23 - 02:33 PM

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/astronomers-grapple-with-jwsts-discovery-of-early-galaxies1/
I never thought of these explanations.

Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple
From: Donuel
Date: 12 Aug 23 - 05:34 PM

There are quantum structures in our brain like micro tubules and the curious extensive limbic system that seems to be full of 'nothing'.

Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple
From: Donuel
Date: 12 Aug 23 - 05:27 PM

The only instant communication -of sorts- that I know of is QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT SWITCHING.

Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple
From: Donuel
Date: 12 Aug 23 - 05:24 PM

NEURONAL and axion transmission is roughly 270 kph but can be up to 470 kph.It depends on age, myelination and axion thickness.
Eyes are fast at about 15 microseconds travel time.

https://newt.phys.unsw.edu.au/music/note/ THIS CONVERTER can help chose notes that can pin point notes like 150 hz (D3) that makes human brains produce the most dopamine. A cello can produce a great D3.

Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple
From: Ebbie
Date: 12 Aug 23 - 03:45 PM

A THOUGHT can travel faster than the speed of light- is this where the future lies?

Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple
From: Donuel
Date: 12 Aug 23 - 01:32 PM

I'm just an amateur but you seem like a pro.

Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple
From: MaJoC the Filk
Date: 12 Aug 23 - 10:34 AM

> I expected the question to be "How could the Universe expand to
> 90 Billion light years in only 13.8 Billion years?"

*Space itself* expands, and drags the Universe with it. There's no light-speed constraint on how fast space can expand, only on how much of it we can see afterwards.

Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple
From: Donuel
Date: 12 Aug 23 - 10:08 AM

Warp five was decided by the Federation to be more environmentally friendly ;^P

I expected the question to be "How could the Universe expand to 90 Billion light years in only 13.8 Billion years?"

Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 12 Aug 23 - 05:59 AM

Thanks MaJoC. I thought that travelling at the actual speed of light would be instantaneous to the traveller and your explanation seems to confirm that. As you rightly point out though, the traveller could not have a non-zero mass so we could not achieve actual light speed. The comment I was questioning was about traveling 9 billion light yeas in 250000 years. That would entail a factor of around 0.003% of what we would see from Earth. I think! What percentage of the speed of light would need to be achieved to do that?

Discounting warp factor 10 of course:-D

Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple
From: MaJoC the Filk
Date: 12 Aug 23 - 05:44 AM

> I don't know what the factor is for travelling at the actual speed of
> light

You're multiplying by

sqrt(1 - v²/c²)

.... which is zero when v == c. Good luck getting there with nonzero mass and finite energy, as you're dividing your effective mass by that factor.

Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 12 Aug 23 - 04:32 AM

Our universe is "9- billion years across"? "So it would take 25,000 years to get there if you traveled at the speed of light."

I would like the mathematics to this explained. To the observer on earth, it would take 9 billion years for light to travel 9 billion light years. To the traveller moving at 99% the speed of light you would need to use a factor of (I think) around 15% so, to them, it would be around 1.3 billion years.

My knowledge stops there as I don't know what the factor is for travelling at the actual speed of light! What is it? Simply that is :-)

Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple
From: Donuel
Date: 11 Aug 23 - 10:48 PM

It's estimated to be 90 billion light years in diameter. That makes some of it beyond a visible horizon to us.

Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple
From: Ebbie
Date: 11 Aug 23 - 04:57 PM

Our universe is "9- billion years across"? "So it would take 25,000 years to get there if you traveled at the speed of light."

However, if you did reach it, wouldn't the universe expand right along with you? How would one know that one's original universe had ended?

Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple
From: Donuel
Date: 11 Aug 23 - 03:35 PM

If you want to learn physics play with toys.
Put a raisin in lemonade.Dip a Q tip in alcohol and light it in a dark closet and watch it as you swirl it around in a circle. spin a raw egg and a hard boiled egg in its shell, stop each and watch the raw egg pick up its spin.
You will see physics at work and fundamental laws expressed.

We live in the area in between quantum mechanics which is fast and small and cosmology which is slow and big. Once you learn to ask the right questions physics will be fun and SIMPLE.

Look at the physics in our body, our civilization, and our planet.
Fundamental laws will be at play in all 3 systems. Something that surprises you or looks weird is the best place to start. Ask your questions and the answers may come to you like playing with toys.
All the patterns around you is physics. The more patterns you master the better you become at mastering your world, your vehicle and your body.

Not all of us see the fun in that but if you do take my words to heart.

Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple
From: Donuel
Date: 11 Aug 23 - 11:26 AM

Upi str sm sdd jp;r/

Those were typos. So is the simple deliberate code above.

Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple
From: gillymor
Date: 11 Aug 23 - 10:31 AM

Spelling correctly seems to be as inconsequential to you as facts are.
The man's name is Murray.

Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple
From: Donuel
Date: 11 Aug 23 - 10:28 AM

Those are the numbers.

"That's a fact Jack"
quote: Bill Murry

Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 11 Aug 23 - 09:15 AM

"Everwhere else from 103F Siberia to 101F Florida ocean is getting warmer.

Yoy guys get what you give."

Well what we don't get from you is facts, sure enough.

Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple
From: gillymor
Date: 11 Aug 23 - 08:34 AM

Yeah, who needs facts? They just get in the way.

Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple
From: Donuel
Date: 11 Aug 23 - 07:00 AM

Regarding my theory that the earliest annihilation of matter and anti matter created a form of matter like debris has more evidence since we have shown that photon collision can produce matter. That was thorized 80 years ago but now we have a photon collider that can do the trick. https://www.imperial.ac.uk/news/149087/scientists-discover-turn-light-into-matter/ It is not known if that matter is visible or invisible like dark matter.

Rejoice, speculation enthusiasts and free thinkers, I am undeterred by idiots and their toadies.
What is knowable does not come pre-assembled in a box on the porch. Nor are facts a discreet black and white certainty. It's good to think outside the box.

Current thought says the universe is 13.8 billion years old and 90 billion light years across. We have equations to estimate the mass of the universe. Only 3 solar masses can make a black hole. How much trillions of stars, non luminous matter plus dark matter and everything else over a gradual decrease in density by expansion will have black hole qualities, is the question. How long it takes to release the boundary of light is calculable. That includes microwave background radiation. Solving the equation without the magical thinking of Inflation theory is more simple to me.

Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple
From: Donuel
Date: 10 Aug 23 - 06:25 AM

The cooling of the equatorial Pacific for decades is a real conundrum.
Everwhere else from 103F Siberia to 101F Florida ocean is getting warmer.

Yoy guys get what you give.

Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 09 Aug 23 - 01:47 PM

"At this point adult education is your best bet. Try it you might like it."

Another example of patronising nonsense.

Donuel, you know even less about me than you know about jokes. FWIW I have never stopped learning. Every day is a fresh opportunity to gain insight into something new and my only total failure has been trying to understand your esoteric ramblings. I used to blame myself for that but I have now learned that not everyone is capable of explaining what they are talking about. That was a steep learning curve but it has taught me a lot.

Most times my learning is self paced and very informal but only a few days ago I completed a course on something entirely new to me and it was of great benefit. Most times my daily dose of new knowledge is filed under "irrelevant" but occasionally something stands out as important enough to remember and useful enough to delve deeper. You brand of cod-science is now firmly in the waste basket

Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 09 Aug 23 - 01:27 PM

It's only meaningless to you because the nuance of the saying has completely eluded you.

Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple
From: Donuel
Date: 09 Aug 23 - 01:18 PM

In a similar vein, outside of math 'average' is meaningless.
Short time alive but LONGTIME DEAD on average means you are almost
entirely dead all your life.
Meaningless.

Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 09 Aug 23 - 01:13 PM

Keep digging.

Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple
From: Donuel
Date: 09 Aug 23 - 12:51 PM

btw Common does not mean normal.

Steve commonly posts accusations he fantasizes.
That does not mean his odd behavior is normal.

Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple
From: Donuel
Date: 09 Aug 23 - 06:14 AM

Just because speculation and misinformation are a near rhyme does not make them the same thing. At this point adult education is your best bet. Try it you might like it.

Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 08 Aug 23 - 12:14 PM

That sounds very plausible Don but your posts are littered with so much misinformation no one knows whether to believe you or not. Rather than fact check all your proclamations it is easier to assume that they are mainly bollocks.

Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple
From: Donuel
Date: 08 Aug 23 - 12:01 PM

We differ in what is obvious.

What is unique about the early universe is that it behaved like an expanding black hole without a singularity. As a result heavy elements and galactic formations proceeded without destruction.

Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 08 Aug 23 - 11:34 AM

I can present as many ideas as you, Don. The difference is I fully understand which ones are genuinely innovative and which ones are bollocks. When I asked you to simplify things I was really hoping that your ideas may be grounded in reality. I was obviously wrong.

Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple
From: Donuel
Date: 08 Aug 23 - 11:11 AM

I present a multitude of ideas unlike the one trick phonies.

Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 08 Aug 23 - 10:36 AM

There is something rather amusing though, Dave, about being patronised by such an intellectual dwarf...

Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 08 Aug 23 - 08:16 AM

Patronising twat

Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple
From: Donuel
Date: 08 Aug 23 - 07:54 AM

Atta boy, thinking beyond yourself is a beginning.

Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 08 Aug 23 - 04:25 AM

This is quite amazing

Zooming out of the universe

You don't even need mushrooms to enjoy it :-)

Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple
From: Donuel
Date: 06 Aug 23 - 05:17 PM

The twice as old theory (TAO) implies a universe that expanded yet contained massless particles at its outer boundary edge. The expansion would have been slower than it is today as it accelerates. The universe would have been pretty damn large by the time massless particles were set free. Space would be free to outpace light and matter until the grip of uber gravity was released. It is beyond our visible horizon now.

Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple
From: MaJoC the Filk
Date: 05 Aug 23 - 11:39 AM

Tired light has been a bust for decades. One Physics prof in one of my previous lives used "leaky photons" as a test for those approaching him with a Marvelous New Theory ....

Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple
From: Donuel
Date: 05 Aug 23 - 08:14 AM

There is a mathematical solution for the mass of the universe to contain light until it was large and thinned out enough to release the light. Number crunchers should be excited.

Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple
From: Donuel
Date: 05 Aug 23 - 08:01 AM

I have been picturing the early universe that expanded under the speed of light producing the great matter-antimatter annihilation, heavier elements, galaxies, and black hole formation - ALL within a region in which the mass of the universe prevented the escape of light until the LET THERE BE LIGHT moment after 13 billion years light could finally escape from a universe that was diffuse enough to release the light.

Inflation theory from 1980 is BOGUS. The tired light theory is BOGUS.

This twice as old theory does not rely on breaking the laws of light.

Subject: RE: BS: KISS keep it simple
From: gillymor
Date: 02 Aug 23 - 07:30 PM

The word the whacko in that trailer used was sociopath not "socialpath".