Lyrics & Knowledge Personal Pages Record Shop Auction Links Radio & Media Kids Membership Help
The Mudcat Cafesj

Post to this Thread - Printer Friendly - Home
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] [30] [31] [32] [33] [34] [35]


What makes a new song a folk song?

Related threads:
So what is *Traditional* Folk Music? (411)
Still wondering what's folk these days? (161)
Folklore: What Is Folk? (156)
Traditional? (75)
New folk song (31) (closed)
What is a kid's song? (53)
What is a Folk Song? (292)
Who Defines 'Folk'???? (287)
Popfolk? (19)
What isn't folk (88)
Does Folk Exist? (709)
Definition of folk song (137)
Here comes that bloody horse - again! (23)
What is a traditional singer? (136)
Is the 1954 definition, open to improvement? (105)
Folklore: Folk, 1954 definition? (133)
'Folk.' OK...1954. What's 'country?' (17)
Folklore: Define English Trad Music (150)
What is Folk Music? This is... (120)
What is Zydeco? (74)
Traditional singer definition (360)
Is traditional song finished? (621)
1954 and All That - defining folk music (994)
BS: It ain't folk if ? (28)
No, really -- what IS NOT folk music? (176)
What defines a traditional song? (160) (closed)
Folklore: Are 'What is Folk?' Threads Finished? (79)
How did Folk Song start? (57)
Should folk songs be sung in folk clubs? (129)
What is The Tradition? (296) (closed)
What is Blues? (80)
What is filk? (47)
What makes it a Folk Song? (404)
Article in Guardian:folk songs & pop junk & racism (30)
Does any other music require a committee (152)
Folk Music Tradition, what is it? (29)
Trad Song (36)
What do you consider Folk? (113)
Definition of Acoustic Music (52)
definition of a ballad (197)
What is Folk? Is RAP the NEw Folk? (219)
Threads on the meaning of Folk (106)
Does it matter what music is called? (451)
What IS Folk Music? (132)
It isn't 'Folk', but what is it we do? (169)
Giving Talk on Folk Music (24)
What is Skiffle? (22)
Folklore: Folk, Pop, Trad or what? (19)
What is Folk? (subtitled Folk not Joke) (11)
Folklore: What are the Motives of the Re-definers? (124)
Is it really Folk? (105)
Folk Rush in Where Mudcat Fears To Go (10)
A new definition of Folk? (34)
What is Folk? IN SONG. (20)
New Input Into 'WHAT IS FOLK?' (7)
What Is More Insular Than Folk Music? (33)
What is Folk Rock? (39)
'What is folk?' and cultural differences (24)
What is a folk song, version 3.0 (32)
What is Muzak? (19)
What is a folk song? Version 2.0 (59)
FILK: what is it? (18)
What is a Folksinger? (51)
BS: What is folk music? (69) (closed)
What is improvisation ? (21)
What is a Grange Song? (26)


Musket 15 Sep 14 - 09:33 AM
Teribus 15 Sep 14 - 09:29 AM
Howard Jones 15 Sep 14 - 09:13 AM
MGM·Lion 15 Sep 14 - 08:52 AM
Lighter 15 Sep 14 - 08:47 AM
TheSnail 15 Sep 14 - 08:36 AM
The Sandman 15 Sep 14 - 08:22 AM
Jim Carroll 15 Sep 14 - 08:09 AM
Bounty Hound 15 Sep 14 - 08:09 AM
MGM·Lion 15 Sep 14 - 07:51 AM
MGM·Lion 15 Sep 14 - 07:40 AM
MGM·Lion 15 Sep 14 - 07:38 AM
Musket 15 Sep 14 - 07:38 AM
The Sandman 15 Sep 14 - 07:03 AM
Jim Carroll 15 Sep 14 - 06:35 AM
The Sandman 15 Sep 14 - 06:11 AM
The Sandman 15 Sep 14 - 05:05 AM
Jim Carroll 15 Sep 14 - 04:18 AM
Phil Edwards 14 Sep 14 - 08:27 PM
Bounty Hound 14 Sep 14 - 06:14 PM
Bounty Hound 14 Sep 14 - 05:33 PM
MGM·Lion 14 Sep 14 - 04:54 PM
Steve Gardham 14 Sep 14 - 04:19 PM
Richard Mellish 14 Sep 14 - 04:18 PM
MGM·Lion 14 Sep 14 - 04:06 PM
Richard Mellish 14 Sep 14 - 03:36 PM
Bounty Hound 14 Sep 14 - 03:17 PM
Jim Carroll 14 Sep 14 - 03:12 PM
Musket 14 Sep 14 - 02:24 PM
Big Al Whittle 14 Sep 14 - 02:12 PM
Bounty Hound 14 Sep 14 - 01:47 PM
Musket 14 Sep 14 - 01:43 PM
Jim Carroll 14 Sep 14 - 01:15 PM
Phil Edwards 14 Sep 14 - 01:03 PM
Bounty Hound 14 Sep 14 - 12:48 PM
Phil Edwards 14 Sep 14 - 12:46 PM
Bounty Hound 14 Sep 14 - 12:37 PM
Steve Gardham 14 Sep 14 - 12:16 PM
Jim Carroll 14 Sep 14 - 12:14 PM
Jim Carroll 14 Sep 14 - 11:58 AM
Musket 14 Sep 14 - 10:56 AM
Jim Carroll 14 Sep 14 - 10:03 AM
Musket 14 Sep 14 - 09:16 AM
Musket 14 Sep 14 - 09:11 AM
Jim Carroll 14 Sep 14 - 08:07 AM
Big Al Whittle 14 Sep 14 - 07:51 AM
The Sandman 14 Sep 14 - 06:14 AM
Jim Carroll 14 Sep 14 - 05:50 AM
Musket 14 Sep 14 - 04:02 AM
Jim Carroll 14 Sep 14 - 03:31 AM
Share Thread
more
Lyrics & Knowledge Search [Advanced]
DT  Forum Child
Sort (Forum) by:relevance date
DT Lyrics:













Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: Musket
Date: 15 Sep 14 - 09:33 AM

If you go to a pudding club, do you expect spotted dick or an embryonic sprog?

Or both? :-)


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: Teribus
Date: 15 Sep 14 - 09:29 AM

Strange that in the apparent mass desire to see "Folk music" as being of the people, by dint of the singer-songwriter putting it "out there" and by what is regarded as being popular with the people why no-one in this threads 13 pages has mentioned Rap. After all it tells of oppression and injustice, it describes social inequality and a whole host of other issues that affect the lives of various communities.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: Howard Jones
Date: 15 Sep 14 - 09:13 AM

The fact is we are talking about two entirely different things - traditional music, and what goes on in folk clubs.

What Jim means by 'folk' is the raw material, the genuine tradition which came from within real communities. However, while the likes of Walter Pardon, Fred Jordan, the Coppers etc appeared in folk clubs from time to time these were rare occurrences, and folk in its raw form seldom formed part of the folk club experience. What you got was 'revival folk', where traditional songs were reinterpreted, whether by the singer-with-guitar stereotype, the folk-rock of Steeleye and Fairport, the synth-folk of Pyewackett or the fusions of the current young generation. When I started going to folk clubs, what I understood by 'traditional music' was Martin Carthy, Nic Jones, Tony Rose etc. However whilst I wasn't much interested in Bob Dylan, Ralph McTell, Donovan etc I saw no great conflict in having this music performed in the same club. It was all part of what I, and more importantly everyone else, understood by 'folk'. It still is.

Jim thinks 'folk club' is an inaccurate term for a club where he can't expect to hear traditional music. Perhaps he's right, however like the word 'folk' itself, 'folk club' has become a shorthand for a certain type of music and a certain type of performing environment. People know broadly what to expect.

'Folk' is not alone in this. What about 'jazz'? If I go to a 'jazz club' I don't know whether to expect traditional jazz, swing, bebop, jazz-rock ,or a myriad of other forms - all very different sounds, but all 'jazz'


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: MGM·Lion
Date: 15 Sep 14 - 08:52 AM

Thanks for that -- much stimulated!!!

Saltarello: exemPlararily Perfectly Peppery Piping.

Like, -- Like!

☺〠☺~M~☺〠☺


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: Lighter
Date: 15 Sep 14 - 08:47 AM

Very much fun, Bounty Hound. I really enjoyed it.

I could understand most of the words, but even though I *know* them, there were still parts that I couldn't make out.

Of course, I'm a furriner. That could explain it.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: TheSnail
Date: 15 Sep 14 - 08:36 AM

Sorry for not taking part the last couple of days. We've had a busy weekend with John Kirkpatrick giving us two all day workshops ("Modes in Traditional Music" and "English Traditional Song") as well as his Saturday evening appearance at the club. All in the upstairs room of a pub. All sold out. One of the floorsingers did a Walter Pardon song - "Down by the dark arches".

Anyway, I think it is time to stop taking this thread seriously. You can't reason with someone who isn't listening.

Following Jim's hints about heavy metal folk, I suggested booking this band http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TIXV2NhLb_0 but the rest of the committee felt that they were more Early Music than Folk.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: The Sandman
Date: 15 Sep 14 - 08:22 AM

" all i can say to him is keep clear of West Cork, "
That is - as far as I'm concerned, a threat of violence.
Perhaps if you desisted from directing virtually all your postings to me and/or stopped making them e#very bit as insulting as you accuse me of doing, this might not happen in the future."
more poopy cock, any threat of violence is in your over fertile imagination you booby.
"The Music Industry has no interest in nothing that can't bring in big megabucks"
bad grammar,it should be anything, your comment no interest in nothing is a double negative, ends up meaning the opposite.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 15 Sep 14 - 08:09 AM

" all i can say to him is keep clear of West Cork, "
That is - as far as I'm concerned, a threat of violence.
Perhaps if you desisted from directing virtually all your postings to me and/or stopped making them e#very bit as insulting as you accuse me of doing, this might not happen in the future.
I'm beginning to know how Jill Dando felt
"MacColl did rather well out of the music industry"
MacColl wrote a love song for Peggy - twenty years later it was taken up by the pop industry - nothing wrong with that, nothing wrong with anybody doing the same
It's a million miles from throwing open the doors of folk clubs to a predatory industry and hanger-on organisations like PRS and IMRO and claiming that their general output is 'folk'.
The Music Industry has no interest in nothing that can't bring in big megabucks - its influence on folk music in the past has done nothing but major damage.
Thanks for the Buffalo correction Mike
Jim Carroll


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: Bounty Hound
Date: 15 Sep 14 - 08:09 AM

Help me out here someone please,

Jim said 'I can't hear the words of Bounty's two songs - no matter how long he has being performing them - that is what I said and that is what I meant.

Now what I'm trying to establish is
A: is there something wrong with my hearing?
B: is there something wrong with Jim's hearing
C: is it a case of Jim having a closed mind and only hearing what he wants to hear?

The issue here, is that according to Jim, folk/rock makes traditional song 'meaningless' as you can't hear the lyrics. Now I'm not asking you to comment on whether you like folk/rock as a style, as that of course is a matter of personal taste, but to listen objectively and let me know whether you can hear and understand what I'm singing

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jO4PrQZgahA


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: MGM·Lion
Date: 15 Sep 14 - 07:51 AM

Dick -- Sorry, but that form of words, if not a threat of violence, will do till a threat of violence comes along. I once had a similar exchange with Fred McCormick, who then tried to climb down when I challenged it as a threat of violence and said he had only meant I could get an earful. When I responded that that was an empty threat, as I was perfectly capable of returning as good an earful as I got [which Jim could doubtless respond to you], and that it still came across to any thinking person reading it as a threat of violence, he let the matter drop.

I do not think it either courteous or politic to threaten people that they had better keep out of one's way 'or they will be very sorry'.

Very sorry!

≈M≈


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: MGM·Lion
Date: 15 Sep 14 - 07:40 AM

misuse, sodit


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: MGM·Lion
Date: 15 Sep 14 - 07:38 AM

Jim, you missed the point about Buffalo Bill. Nothing to do with his 'being' a buffalo, but of his never having seen one. He only saw bison. It's an example of semantic misyse -- as some claim for some usages of 'folk'.

≈M≈

'That shiny white animal with silvery horns -- is it a water buffalo?'

'No - it's a wash-bison.'

I am thanking u


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: Musket
Date: 15 Sep 14 - 07:38 AM

MacColl did rather well out of the music industry. His family don't have to worry about the cares and worries of those he sang about in fact...

A member of PRS and raking royalties just like anybody else wishing to make music a profession....

So stop all this crap about music of the people and despising the industry codswallop. Those moaning about it were playing to the crowd, and increasing their own sales as a result. You should never ever be made to feel guilt for making a bob or two out of your talent.

Mind you, it reminds me of when a rather famous folk singer fell ill a few years ago and because she still did the pubs and clubs, there was a natural well meant thought that she might not be able to make ends meet whilst not playing. A bit of a whip round was started at a festival and the dilemma she had was not wishing to feel ungrateful but couldn't take money from people as her record sales in The Uk, Europe, USA, Canada, Australia etc etc over the years and the income from tours abroad where she played large venues, TV appearances and the like added up to real money by anybody's standards. The well meaning people who assumed that income from a folk club a couple of times a week was all she had. You see, the music industry Jim seems to despise makes millions out of folk music for those who rise to the challenge, through a combination of talent, luck and being in the right place at the right time.

Folk music has moved on since Bert Lloyd tried coining it.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: The Sandman
Date: 15 Sep 14 - 07:03 AM

there are no threats of violence you booby. MY WORDS... all i can say to him is keep clear of West Cork, if you ever ever insult me to my face as you have insulted myself and other members of this forum, you will be very very sorry.
I will repeat my words,all i can say to him is keep clear of West Cork, if you ever ever insult me to my face as you have insulted myself and other members of this forum, you will be very very sorry. and I have not threatened you with violence.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 15 Sep 14 - 06:35 AM

"your utter contempt for all the in the folk music organisers"
No it damn well is not.
My objection is the fact that what goes on today has nothing to do with folk music - beyond that, I have neither the interest nor the knowledge of the alternative product to be contemptible of it - all I know is that it is not folk music.
The contempt is entirely the other way in the open declarations of contempt for the singers who gave us our songs.
I have insulted nobody as a performer on this forum
One of the problems of the folk scene today is that they have wrapped themselves in a cocoon to avoid criticism of what they do - criticism is not contempt and every other creative art for is subject to having their work held up to public scrutiny.
Not the folk song revival, it woould appear
I can't hear the words of Bounty's two songs - no matter how long he has being performing them - that is what I said and that is what I meant.
The "noise" I referred to is a fact - no publican we ever ra a club in would have tolerate loud amplified music in his upstairs room - we have noigh of the problem from the opposite direction when pubs began installing loud juke-boxes.
That was not a critical statement - it was an established fact.
My point here right along is that many folk clubs have abandoned folk music - nothing more.
"insulted myself and other members of this forum, you will be very very sorry."
And now we have threats of violence - thanks for the illustration of the level to which this discussion has sunk to.
THIS FORM OF THUGGERY HAS NO PLACE ON AN OPEN DISCUSSION FORUM - NEVER REPEAT SUCH A THREAT TO ME AGAIN
Jim Carroll


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: The Sandman
Date: 15 Sep 14 - 06:11 AM

"MacColl said about forty years ago that the folk scene would die if it ever fell into the hands of the music industry and if it was ever taken over by people who didn't like folk songs."I agree with this statement, however no one on this thread has said they do not like folk songs, some have said they prefer american folk songs some have said they prefer contemporary folk songs, no one has said they do not like folk songs, neither as far as i am aware has anyone said that the folk scene should be run by the music industry.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: The Sandman
Date: 15 Sep 14 - 05:05 AM

"your utter contempt for all the in the folk music organisers, all the people who try to keep the creation of folk songs a fresh vibrant option of self expression is etched in acid in every phrase of your correspondence."
exactly, plus Mr Carrolls continued insulting remarks to people who disagree with him on any topic, be they KEITH A, The Snail, or me.
"God on our side" is in part a direct response to "The Patriot Game", e.g. "My name it is nothing, my age it means less" responds to "My name is O'Hanlon and I'm just gone sixteen". I'm not familiar with much of Dylan's output (must have led a sheltered life) but I'm sure I've seen references to others of his songs being partly based on previous songs. So new songs, but at least partly inspired by old ones, not merely re-using tune"
another example of this is raglan road, which not only uses the tune of dawning on the day, but is also based on the words of the song.
Richard Mellish, just to get the record straight it was I NOT JIM CA RROLL THAT FIRST SAID IN THIS THREAD THAT NEW SONGS BECOME FOLK SONGS WHEN THEY GET TAKEN UP BY MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WHO ARE NOT FOLK AFFICIANADOS OR MEMBERS OF THE UK FOLK REVIVAL WHO ASSUME THEY ARE TRADITIONAL. Jim later castigated me for not having anything of value to say and then in later posts adopted a position very similiar to my own.
all i can say to him is keep clear of West Cork, if you ever ever insult me to my face as you have insulted myself and other members of this forum, you will be very very sorry.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 15 Sep 14 - 04:18 AM

Richard
I'll respond as well as I can to your points
"and in a wider sense by the man in the street."
The term is not used by "the man in the street" in any significant sense, certainly not enough to re-define it, as is being claimed here.
The term has been taken and applied to a different type - (or types) of music - there appears to be no consensus on what type of song I will hear if I turn up at a folk club today - so I no longer have the choice I once had, to select what I wish to listen to - I can think of no other performed art form where this is the case.
"Buffalo Bill" never claimed to be a buffalo - he would heve been banged up and put in a padded jacket if he had, so would Elephant Bill, or Crocodile Joe or Eddie the Eagle, or a Man Called Horse..... a nickname is not a definition of anything.
"What about rare ballads"
Rare ballads are rare because at the time that we found them, few people were singing them.
The two you mentioned have survived for centuries in the mouths and memories of innumerable singers up to the point where they had all but disappeared - that's what gave them their claim to being folk songs - they were the property of the folk and were almost certainly made within the old folk communities.
The rarity of certain centuries old ballads and songs can be put down the fact that there was no significant interest in folk song prior to the beginning of the twentieth century, when the singing traditions were very much on the wane.
Non literate Irish travellers were the sources of a singficant number of rare ballads, The Maid and the Palmer' being one of the most spectacular examples, indicating that they were firmly established in the oral folk tradition.
"Consider all the ballads about kings, lords and ladies, those about sibling murders "
Not sure of your point here, but all these motifs are a firm part of the oral folk tradition, particularly in tales, and the situations they occur in within the ballads can largely be dealt with in everyday human terms - it wasn't all that long ago that people were announcing the death of a family member by 'telling the bees'.
Our traditional songs work on several levels - they work a stories to entertain and also as expressions of our own outlook on life - a good singer can do both, the older generation appeared to do both with ease - I could't count the number of times that a singer has told us "That's a true song", not particularly because they thought it had happened, but simply because it created a situation they could relate to.
"But you need only attend a particular club once to find out, "
In which case, contact with folk songs become an accident which only can occur chooses to present folk songs - no longer the case in many.
The folk club scene came about because people discovered a specific kind of music and and decided it was entertaining enough to follow up
One of the main ways of doing this was to set up venues where you could go to listen and perform them - in Britain,they were largely based on the songs that were collected by the BBC teams between 1950 and 55 - pretty well definable as folk songs.
When the type of songs became undefinable, the basis for the club scene was destroyed - they became 'music' clubs - nothing to do with folk creation or ownership.
"with some changes from the original words"
Change is not a defining feature of what makes folk song, though it can be part of the process.
MacColl's Freeborn Man may well have become a folk song because Travellers took it up as their own; unfortunately the process of passing on the song to make it part of the Traveller culture may well have disappeared due to changes in the community
That is very much the case within the settled communities, where we have become passive recipients of our culture - we take what we are given, but they are not ours and never will be - any use we make of it has to be with the permission of the creators.
"And what about Dylan's making new songs out of existing ones"
Fine - that's what I have been advocating should happen for most of the time I have been involved (Dylan wrote his folk-based songs half a century ago - he announced he was moving on and did) - they'll never become folk songs because he made sure they wouldn't, but beside the point
MacColl said about forty years ago that the folk scene would die if it ever fell into the hands of the music industry and if it was ever taken over by people who didn't like folk songs.
Much of what is being performed at clubs, according to contributors to this argument, is the property of the Music Industry already and the fact that it is in the hands of people who don't like folk song has been confirmed by some of those taking part - I particularly liked the idea of buying Fred Jordan a pint and sitting him down to listen to Fairport - that'll do nicely.
Plenty more to respond to - will do so when I can, breakfast calls.
Jim Carroll


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: Phil Edwards
Date: 14 Sep 14 - 08:27 PM

Just come from a singaround myself. Brilliant night, lots of younger people in (mostly doing old songs). Lots of harmonies; probably the best version of "Let union be" you could ever hear, and a very enjoyable version of "Molly Malone" (!). Overall it was about 50/50 trad/contemporary - maybe a bit more or less either way, depending how you classify 'trad'.

So no, Al, I don't want to turn 'folk' into a museum piece, or whatever it was. But I enjoyed this evening more than I would an evening which was 80% contemporary, and I think if it had been 80% traditional I would have enjoyed it even more.

Steve G: If new songs are not added to the general repertoire we are a museum and nothing else.

It doesn't seem to bother classical musicians; personally, I don't think it should bother us. Peter Bellamy, Martin Graebe and Chris Wood are/were fine songwriters, but I don't think it'd be a tragedy if their songs dropped out of circulation. I do think it'd be a tragedy if nobody was singing the likes of Some Tyrant or Willie's Drowned in Yarrow, because then we wouldn't just have lost a songwriter or two - we'd have lost a whole different kind of song.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: Bounty Hound
Date: 14 Sep 14 - 06:14 PM

Oh and if you want evidence Jim, perhaps you should check out the history of Fairport's Cropredy festival, started almost 30 years ago, with the primary purpose of showcasing the band themselves, and growing ever since to the stage where it now attracts 20,000 people.
faded from the scene....well, maybe not!


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: Bounty Hound
Date: 14 Sep 14 - 05:33 PM

'It faded from the scene - the argument given twenty years ago was many young musicians couldn't afford the equipment - nor could the dwindling number of venues cater for the noise.

Jim, I'm sorry, but despite having the utmost respect for your work and knowledge of the tradition, I've come to the conclusion you're now taking bullshit, and making arguments for the sake of disagreeing!

Your statement above is complete nonsense! Simply, I discovered folk music, both of your definition, and of others, in my teens, around 40 years ago, and I can assure you that folk/rock never faded from the scene. Your end to that statement actually very clearly gives away your real thoughts 'couldn't cater for the NOISE'

You ask for people to respect you, but YOU show little respect for others. Now, what you have to bear in mind Sir, is that just because YOU don't like something, does not make it wrong, or of any less value! You would do well to remember that this is not YOUR tradition, it is OURS, and how we choose to use that tradition is our decision.

'I listened to your two offerings.
If one hadn't been labeled @Blackleg Miner' I wouldn't have recognised it in twenty years - and I've been singing it for forty
The other one I mistook for an Irish song from the Ballad Boom of the sixties; didn't recognise it as one from the title and couldn't follow the words
Acid test enough for me - sorry.'

Wouldn't have recognised....OR DID NOT WANT TOO..... I think we both know the answer to that! And just out of interest, Blackleg Miner was one of the first songs I learned, so I've also been singing it for 40 years, which I guess must make me as 'expert' as you then!

Can I, politely, of course, suggest that you stick to what you are a recognised expert in.

Just to repeat what I said earlier, you want respect, show some yourself!

John


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: MGM·Lion
Date: 14 Sep 14 - 04:54 PM

Ah, yes. See what you mean, Richard.

≈M≈


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: Steve Gardham
Date: 14 Sep 14 - 04:19 PM

Phil,
I don't know why you have a problem with my last posting. We ARE passing on the traditional material and the many many good songs that have been written in the last 60 years and those that are still being written. If new songs are not added to the general repertoire we are a museum and nothing else. I've just come from a final singaround at our local festival, and it is very local, not featuring for various reasons in the 'Folk Festival' calendar. I'd say the balance between trad and those written in the last 60 years was 50-50, and to my mind, someone steeped in traditional song, that's healthy!!!


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: Richard Mellish
Date: 14 Sep 14 - 04:18 PM

"God on our side" is in part a direct response to "The Patriot Game", e.g. "My name it is nothing, my age it means less" responds to "My name is O'Hanlon and I'm just gone sixteen". I'm not familiar with much of Dylan's output (must have led a sheltered life) but I'm sure I've seen references to others of his songs being partly based on previous songs. So new songs, but at least partly inspired by old ones, not merely re-using tunes.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: MGM·Lion
Date: 14 Sep 14 - 04:06 PM

Agree with certain amount of what you say, Richard. But can't quite follow

"And what about Dylan's making new songs out of existing ones (both traditional ones and recent ones such as The Patriot Game)?"

Where did Dylan do that? If you mean writing new words to the same tune, that is not "making a new song out of an existing one", it is simply reusing a tune. (And, tune-wise, 'The Patriot Game' is not recent; its tune is a version of 'The Grenadier & The Lady', aka 'To Hear The Nightingale Sing', as I once actually got Dominic Behan, who till then had sort of let it be generally understood that he had composed it himself, to agree during a correspondence in Folk Review.) If that isn't what you mean, show, please, where Dylan performed the action you urge, of "making new songs out of existing ones".

≈M≈


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: Richard Mellish
Date: 14 Sep 14 - 03:36 PM

This discussion puts my in mind of the blind men's discussion of the elephant, including their being rude to each other about their respective opinions.

Most of the assertions are true, from the respective viewpoints of the people making them, but those viewpoints are different.

I'm minded to add my three ha'p'orth and hope that I'm not muddying the water.

"Folk" is only one of innumerable terms that are used in a narrow sense in a specialist context and in a wider sense by the man in the street. It has often been remarked that "Buffalo Bill never saw a buffalo". Correct, if you apply a zoologist's meaning of buffalo, but also ridiculous.

Jim seems (if I'm not misinterpreting) to be saying that, to become a folk song, a song has not merely to be taken up by others besides its original creator but to be taken up by many others in a community. What about rare ballads only ever collected from one or two singers, such as "William and Lady Marjorie" (as sung by Joe Rae, Gutcher on here) or King Orfeo? Do they not qualify?

Also that "anybody can identify with the situations they throw up in some way or other" as Jim, with his asbestos experience, can relate to Pete Smith's aniline. There's no need for such specific personal experience; we only need to be able to relate to the protagonists as human beings. Consider all the ballads about kings, lords and ladies, those about sibling murders (The Two Sisters, Lucy Wan, etc) and those with talking birds.

Loose usage of the term "folk" can indeed cause confusion and uncertainty about what one will hear in a "folk club". But you need only attend a particular club once to find out, because mostly the same people will be there next time singing the same kind(s) of material. According to whether you like most of what you hear or not, you know whether it's worth going again. (And, as evidenced by some of the recent postings in this thread, what some people will eagerly go back for more of sends other people running. That's down to personal taste.) In recent years I have attended three clubs. I know pretty well what I can expect to hear at each of them; which is why I go to one often and the others only when there is a particular reason.

As for the folk process being impossible in this day and age: I have heard people sing songs by MacColl and Tawney with some changes from the original words, albeit minor ones. And what about Dylan's making new songs out of existing ones (both traditional ones and recent ones such as The Patriot Game)? Whether we happen to like his remakes or not, he was certainly carrying out an ancient process.

Which has a better claim to being a folk song: a modern song in a more-or-less traditional idiom, such as one of Tawney's or MacColl's, performed unaccompanied or with a simple backing; or a song that's been around for hundreds of years accompanied by an umpteen-piece band who play for twice as long as the singer sings the words, and half drown the words when (s)he is singing them? I know which I personally PREFER to listen to, but that's a different question.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: Bounty Hound
Date: 14 Sep 14 - 03:17 PM

What I care about is that people continue to get a chance to hear and to sing traditional songs. And it would be nice if we could rely on hearing them at folk clubs - because we certainly can't rely on hearing them anywhere else.

Phil, I've just re-read your last post, what about folk festivals, singarounds in local pubs, radio folk shows, Internet streamed folk shows, television etc etc.

It's there if you look for it!


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 14 Sep 14 - 03:12 PM

"your utter contempt for all the in the folk music organisers"
Nothing of the sort DISAGREEMENT IS NOT CONTEMPT- IT IS DISAGREEMENT
" all the people who try to keep the creation of folk songs a fresh vibrant option of self expression"
No they don't they make something else of them (those that use them), often as far away as you can get from self-expression.
"atrophied junk"
Now that's what I call contempt
" I wish the people who try to perform stuff like that would take the shit out of their ears."
And that
" A lot of the stuff isn't that good, and they're debollocking themselves fruitlessly trying to breathe life jnto it."
That as well
THanks for the example Al - saves me the trouble of dredging out all the oyhet examples that have become the basis of your arguments here.
"since the advent of Fairport and Steeleye in the late 60's folk/rock has been ever present"
It faded from the scene - the argument given twenty years ago was many young musicians couldn't afford the equipment - nor could the dwindling number of venues cater for the noise.
"isn't that basically the same thing,"
No, it most certainly isn't.
If you have a narrative form as English language folk songs is, and you swamp it in electronic accompaniment, as electric music does, you have changed its function - it ceases to be narrative
"and then come back and tell me again you can't follow the words!"
Have intermittently listened to them down the years - I listened to your two offerings.
If one hadn't been labeled @Blackleg Miner' I wouldn't have recognised it in twenty years - and I've been singing it for forty
The other one I mistook for an Irish song from the Ballad Boom of the sixties; didn't recognise it as one from the title and couldn't follow the words
Acid test enough for me - sorry.
"the Fred Jordans of this world were given polite reverence for their contribution, and then we sat back to listen to Fairport..."
Another piece of contempt - no need to go over the top lads - Al was doing quite well on his own.
And they tell me the folk scene is in good hands - my arseum!!
Jim Carroll


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: Musket
Date: 14 Sep 14 - 02:24 PM

I am reminded of Fred Wedlock's parody of The Boxer.

In Sir Patrick Spens I clean forgot the forty second verse,
So I sang the eighty second, twice as fast and in reverse,
And no one noticed.
I laughed for hours,
Till the tears ran down my trouser leg
And I thought I'd er.. Eeurgh!


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: Big Al Whittle
Date: 14 Sep 14 - 02:12 PM

contempt!

your utter contempt for all the in the folk music organisers, all the people who try to keep the creation of folk songs a fresh vibrant option of self expression is etched in acid in every phrase of your correspondence.

maybe you and Phil need to have folk music transformed into some pile of atrophied junk with Ewan's little lion stamped on the outside and the approval of the Irish government (when its not persecuting teenagers who need an abortion), but thank christ the huge majority don't.

yes i do have respect for the Larners etc., but I'm not uncritical and I wish the people who try to perform stuff like that would take the shit out of their ears. A lot of the stuff isn't that good, and they're debollocking themselves fruitlessly trying to breathe life jnto it.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: Bounty Hound
Date: 14 Sep 14 - 01:47 PM

Recently there has been a revisiting, but I have little doubt it will be short lived.
Sorry Jim, you've lost me there, since the advent of Fairport and Steeleye in the late 60's folk/rock has been ever present, and I don't share your opinion that it will be short lived, after all, It's already been around almost as long as the 1954 definition!

'The once again you misunderstand what I am saying - it is not a matter of debasing anything - it's a matter of it making folk song meaningless I'm afraid you've lost me there as well Jim, isn't that basically the same thing, so I don't think I'm misunderstanding you at all. Here's a challenge for you, have a listen to some recordings of folk/rock bands playing traditional songs, and then come back and tell me again you can't follow the words!

John


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: Musket
Date: 14 Sep 14 - 01:43 PM

Folk rock made traditional music acceptable to a discerning music audience.

In addition, the old men with trousers up to their tits, (many of whom I knew rather well,) had their moment of fame from the early '60s to when folk rock and contemporary folk took over the reins, err.. a couple of years later in the minds of most. By the time I got there, the Fred Jordans of this world were given polite reverence for their contribution, and then we sat back to listen to Fairport...

Been there ever since.

Growing all the time.

As I said Jim. Your lack of knowledge of folk is rather staggering sometimes.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 14 Sep 14 - 01:15 PM

Folk Rock was the bees knees at one time - there was even a book about it.
Recently there has been a revisiting, but I have little doubt it will be short lived.
One of the major steps in de-democratising folk song, which is basically a non-accompanied art for, is by loading it up with expensive electronic hardware - put it ot of reach of many would-be performers and would not be tolerated in most of the venues that housed folk clubs, even if there was space for them - no publican wants ear-splitting noise blasting though his ceiling..
Folk rock says exactly what it is - a giant stride towards taking the music out of our hands and giving to back to the Music Industry.
"I've not been contemptuous, or insulting"
No you haben't, but you've certainly managed to be patronising - that's why I mentioned it - I accepted your apology, but it's still been part of the attitude expressed in much of this discussion from elsewhere.
"folk/rock style are somehow debasing the tradition"
The once again you misunderstand what I am saying - it is not a matter of debasing anything - it's a matter of it making folk song meaningless.
Our folk songs are based on understanding words and following narrative line (plots)
Folk rock does something else to it entirely
"This includes a wide umbrella of folk music".
You have et to say how ide that umbrella is and how it fits into any definition.
You either haven't understood or are delberately distorting my arguments by suggesting that I am demanding an adherence to '54.
I don't, I ner have and I never will - certainly not as far as clubs are concerned.
Jim Carroll


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: Phil Edwards
Date: 14 Sep 14 - 01:03 PM

There are many many volunteers, semi-pros and pros of all ages working hard in the UK on passing on all of the folk music to another generation. This includes a wide umbrella of folk music. If we stood there insisting on the 54 definition it would be dead and buried in a couple of decades.

Don't understand how the last sentence goes with the previous two. If you're not talking about 'passing on' 1954-def traditional songs, what are they passing on? And if they're not passing on traditional songs, how will what they're doing be any help in keeping traditional songs alive?

Personally I don't care about performance styles - three-part harmony, electric guitar, whatever. What I care about is that people continue to get a chance to hear and to sing traditional songs. And it would be nice if we could rely on hearing them at folk clubs - because we certainly can't rely on hearing them anywhere else.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: Bounty Hound
Date: 14 Sep 14 - 12:48 PM

It's as likely to disappear in a puff of smaoke as did 'folk Rock

Having just read your last posts Jim, and running the risk of being accused of being insulting, they really do illustrate how far out of touch you've become with what is happening in the folk world today. Ask Fairport, Oysterband, Steeleye and others who still sell out everywhere they play if folk/rock has disappeared in a puff of smoke!


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: Phil Edwards
Date: 14 Sep 14 - 12:46 PM

I'm not patronising you Jim

If that's sincerely meant, I suggest you need to try a bit harder. My patronisometer is in the red, and I'm not even Jim.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: Bounty Hound
Date: 14 Sep 14 - 12:37 PM

I suggest you read some of yours, Muskett's and Bounty Hound's postings, which range from contemptuous and patronising to downright insulting - to me and to the old singers who one of you in particular has taken time out to personally abuse.

Actually Jim, I rather resent that comment, I'm fairly confident that I've not been contemptuous, or insulting, and when I quoted my understanding of words you were trying to add meaning to that was clearly not there, and in response to that, accused me of being patronising, I immediately posted an apology! You will also find if you look, that I also(twice) posted a statement acknowledging the work you have done.

I'm well aware that we have very differing opinions on what constitutes folk music and song and that you consider that traditional songs performed in a folk/rock style are somehow debasing the tradition, whereas I see it as a means of preserving and maintaining it, and I could now jump up and down and complain that you are being 'contemptuous' of what I choose to do, (and a large number of people draw pleasure from). Instead, all I've said is that we will have to agree to differ on that one

John


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: Steve Gardham
Date: 14 Sep 14 - 12:16 PM

Jim,
There are many many volunteers, semi-pros and pros of all ages working hard in the UK on passing on all of the folk music to another generation. This includes a wide umbrella of folk music. If we stood there insisting on the 54 definition it would be dead and buried in a couple of decades.

I'm in the middle of a local maritime folk festival which has so far been wonderful. I've just come from performing at a concert that had a whole load of singers of all ages ranging from the wonderful Jim Radford who writes songs about his own wartime experiences in the MN (He must be at least 86) to a young 20 year old singing local trad material accompanying himself very expertly on the anglo. In another part of town theree's a marquee with folk rock bands and yesterday as I waited for some of our historic ships to come into harbour I listened to their sounds floating across the harbour, a bit like Oyster Band material, and I was entranced. What you say about the UK folk scene is simply not true!!!!


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 14 Sep 14 - 12:14 PM

Can I just add about Carthy
He has by respect for the love and understanding for folk song and the way he has no hesitation in the unqualified way he acknowledges the invaluable contribution of people like Harry Cox, Sam Larner Walter Pardon made to it - the "waistbands-up-to-the-armpits" brigade, as somebody once put it.
Jim Carroll


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 14 Sep 14 - 11:58 AM

" That Carthy is the driving force behind The Imagined Village"
Personally I find 'Imagined Village totally inconsequential to the future of folk songs
It's as likely to disappear in a puff of smaoke as did 'folk Rock'
I'm not a great fan of Carthy's, but I am aware that some of what he did helped promote folk song, on the other hand, 'The Watersons' - great idea at the time -managed to make all folksongs sound the same - which they are not.
As for 'Span' - a total waste of time - narrative songs turned into electric mush.
"You'd prefer it if Paul Weller stuck his finger in his ear perhaps?"
Finger cupped over the ear is one of the world's oldest techniques for singing in tune - you people ave managed to turn it into a term of abuse.
See what mean about patronising - you reduce any hope of a reasonable discussion to abuse?
I have little doubt you like Lady Gaga - I doubt if I'd remember her song had I been there - I find most pop songs instantly forgettable - that is how they are marketed.
"Festivals and virtual are the future - upstairs rooms in pubs belonged to a different century,"
Upsairs rooms brought democracy into folk song - putting performers on a stage in front of an audience removes that demcracy.
It also removes the chance of families not in a position to travel, being part of the music.
Everything you write confirms my point - please keep going
Jim Carroll


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: Musket
Date: 14 Sep 14 - 10:56 AM

Ah.. Just because Carthy is doing music that reaches a wide audience, that's alright but the rest aren't.. That Carthy is the driving force behind The Imagined Village and their aim is to reflect the folk heritage of a multicultural UK isn't enough? You'd prefer it if Paul Weller stuck his finger in his ear perhaps?

I'm not patronising you Jim, I'm trying to understand you and failing here, trust me. If folk as a concept to influence music has a future, we aren't going to get it by saying Larner this, Pardon that and McColl the other. None of them had any idea of today's society and it is today's society where we get today's folk culture from.

Festivals and virtual are the future. Upstairs rooms in pubs belonged to a different century, and sadly, will die out as those who frequent them get older. If a young person wants to discover and play for others now, a more natural reaction is to YouTube their songs and spend hours listening to others doing the same.

I suggest you listen to the Fifty Years of Cambridge Folk Festival album, it might surprise you.





ps. I actually like Lady Ga Ga's music and when I saw her at the O2 a few years ago, she sang what she referred to as a traditional song from the time of American war of independence. Can't recall what it was called and I certainly hadn't heard it before, but the words certainly suited her fast tempo rendition...


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 14 Sep 14 - 10:03 AM

"Jim. Try finding out a bit more about folk music before coming out with such statements eh?"
I've tried my best down the years Muskie - obviously you've got me beat hands down!
Try not to partoise and your points might be better received.
None of those you mention, with the possible exception of Carthy isnpires me to believe that a real and lasting interest in folk music is to be got from the type of festivals you describe - I' do't like water in my malt whisky either
Jim Carroll


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: Musket
Date: 14 Sep 14 - 09:16 AM

Do you know what my niece's lad enjoyed most about a rock festival he was at the other month? (As he told me anyway...)

Hearing Martin Carthy singing The Handweaver and the Factory Maid. He asked if I had the words and guitar tab. The Imagined Village as a concept is my definition of folk if I think about it hard enough. 21st Century UK folk.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: Musket
Date: 14 Sep 14 - 09:11 AM

Jim. Try finding out a bit more about folk music before coming out with such statements eh?

Kylie, etc etc.

The huge draws at music festivals and sales of albums over the last few wonderful years have been Mumford & Son, Seth Lakeman, Ed Sheeran, Bellowhead....

Folk and folk inspired acoustic sounds are what sells. That is why the moaning lot who say folk is dying make me piss myself laughing.

Then dismiss them as weird sods.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 14 Sep 14 - 08:07 AM

"you've turned it into a slanging match. by disavowing what we call folk music to be folk music"
No I haven't Al - I've disagreed with you, no more - that is what these arguments are about.
"the fierce rejection is mostly on your side."
You mean I'm oly allowed to disagree if I do it gently?
I suggest you read some of yours, Muskett's and Bounty Hound's postings, which range from contemptuous and patronising to downright insulting - to me and to the old singers who one of you in particular has taken time out to personally abuse.
I have argued my case strongly because I believe the subject to be important.
I have a definition that suits me - I have given enough examples to show that it suits others equally as well.
Unless you - or somebody else, provides an equally logical and acceptable, that is the one that will survive long after all thee clubs have disappeared.
You have yet to provide an alternative, your main argument being that my take on the subject doesn't attract big enough audiences.
If that were relevant, we may as well all piss off home and leave the field clear for Jedward, Kylie and Lady Gaga - they all attract bigger audiences than any of us could hope to draw in a lifetime.
Give us a break Al - and give us a definition we can work with
Jim Carroll


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: Big Al Whittle
Date: 14 Sep 14 - 07:51 AM

'it is, or should be about what we mean by folk song.
The pair of you, to a lesser degree, have turned it int a slanging match.'

you've turned it into a slanging match. by disavowing what we call folk music to be folk music. the fierce rejection is mostly on your side.
the historians and grant givers, and so on will always be your side. they are more comfortable with dead miners and the like than the current brutalities and working class diversions of modern life. i understand that you feel you need the academics conferring the tags of respectability on your work.

but publicly denying the validity of experience of folk music by guys like myself, ian and dick - well its not right. frankly its not good behaviour.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: The Sandman
Date: 14 Sep 14 - 06:14 AM

"Then I'd be more than happy if you went and discussed with someone else - we really do have nothing to say to each other"
precisely, what i have been doing, but then you enter the debate and do as you always do start insulting other members of this forum who disagree with you. you then insult other performers but do not have the guts to name them, and accuse musket of insulting people.
   "But that is part of folk, not the definition of it. There is a part of folk that means musical entertainment you can enjoy for the noise it makes, not the provenance of the words and tune. Music that can be and is enjoyed by a far wider audience"
Exactly


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 14 Sep 14 - 05:50 AM

"No issue with that. But then I and others give our idea of what a folk song is and you say we are wrong. "
No problem with that Mukie - I could have done with a better alternative than the one you came up with, but we can't always have wat we wish for,
My objectio here is how you - particularly you - heve gone about denigrating folk song as many of us know it and insulting the people who gave it to us
That should form no part of a discussion such as this, as far as I'm concerned.
Not on
Jim Carroll


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: Musket
Date: 14 Sep 14 - 04:02 AM

Jim. Your comment that "I have given you my idea of what a folk song is" works as a statement. No issue with that. But then I and others give our idea of what a folk song is and you say we are wrong.

It's that second bit that winds people up. Especially when you invoke your study as some sort of proof. You cannot prove subjective titles either way.

I accept that Walter Pardon was folk, that Tom Brown was folk , even when he unashamedly sang a song I gave him and told Jim Lloyd on the BBC (or was it Colin Irwin in a newspaper piece? memory going..) he learned it at his mother's knee. I accept that Ewan MacColl did collect some songs that Child or Sharpe hadn't noticed.

But that is part of folk, not the definition of it. There is a part of folk that means musical entertainment you can enjoy for the noise it makes, not the provenance of the words and tune. Music that can be and is enjoyed by a far wider audience.

Still folk.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: What makes a new song a folk song?
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 14 Sep 14 - 03:31 AM

"I will continue to discuss with people who can discuss in a civil manner, which you by all appearances appear unwilling to do so,"
Then I'd be more than happy if you went and discussed with someone else - we really do have nothing to say to each other
Jim Carroll


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate
Next Page

  Share Thread:
More...

Reply to Thread
Subject:  Help
From:
Preview   Automatic Linebreaks   Make a link ("blue clicky")


Mudcat time: 2 May 1:02 AM EDT

[ Home ]

All original material is copyright © 2022 by the Mudcat Café Music Foundation. All photos, music, images, etc. are copyright © by their rightful owners. Every effort is taken to attribute appropriate copyright to images, content, music, etc. We are not a copyright resource.