Etiquette question

Subject: RE: Etiquette question
From: bseed(charleskratz)
Date: 01 Oct 99 - 01:17 PM

That was a bit quick on the trigger--we used to have an intermediate dialogue box where we could stop our errors before they actually went out, but that one got away from me.

What I was about to say was I can understand Harpgirl's feelings--this thread has kind of evolved into a public discussion of a confidential therapeutic file, and I take responsibility for my part in turning it in this direction. Harpie, there's still room in my heart for you, along with Barbara, Kat, Alice, and Emily Rain, and any others to whom I have promised undying devotion.

--seed

Subject: RE: Etiquette question
From: bseed(charleskratz)
Date: 01 Oct 99 - 01:18 PM

That was so good I had to say it twice. --seed

Subject: RE: Etiquette question
From: Marion
Date: 01 Oct 99 - 02:57 PM

Sophocleese, another couple of netiquette terms for you:

Shouting = typing in all capital letters

Spamming = the wide distribution of unsolicited/unwelcome material, especially advertising, chain letters, and hoaxes/urban legends like fake virus warnings or appeals to save dying children through email. It can also refer to the circulation of jokes, Darwin awards, Chicken-Soup-For-The-Soul type stories, top ten lists and so on where this is unwelcome. The noun is spam.

Marion

Subject: RE: Etiquette question
From: katlaughing
Date: 01 Oct 99 - 03:41 PM

...seed, what "confidential therapeutic file"??!! Never heard of nor seen one in relation to anybody on here and wouldn't want to!

You've a big heart.*BG*

kat

Subject: RE: Etiquette question
From: sophocleese
Date: 01 Oct 99 - 05:11 PM

Marion and Jeri thank you for the information. I'll file it away for future reference.

Sophocleese, whoain'tasknowledgableasthenamemightindicate

Subject: RE: Etiquette question
From: --seed
Date: 01 Oct 99 - 05:32 PM

Kat, it's just that the discussion was turning from speculation on whether he was C. of W. or not to analyses of his psychologcal condition, sometimes sympathetic to him, sometimes not, but nonetheless getting into territory I'd be embarrassed having people discussing in such a public forum. In a way, Gargoyle is being gargoyled--poetic justice, perhaps, but that kinda makes us all Gargoyles. --seed