Subject: RE: BS: speed restrictions in cars From: Amos Date: 19 Dec 06 - 12:34 PM In Singapore, not only the taxis but the commercially-licensed trucks and vans have a flashing yellow light on the top that flashes "I'm speeding" when the car exceeds the limit. I have heard that Singapore requires governors on private vehicles sold, but I am not positive of this. In Mexico, driving is a death-defying art in which you are often required to pass large slow lorries on curvy two-lane roads. This is a test of your extra-sensory abilities of perception. Every now and then you pass a broken-out guard rail with some car or bus down in the valley below that failed the test. I am extremely thankful I had the extra power of a large Chevy V8 engine under me when I drove through the Mexican highlands, which I did regularly for a year without a mishap. The REAL issue is not the machines and limiting them. It is human sanity and human judgement. That is a much tougher nut to crack, but that's where the real solution lies. If we understood how to raise individual responsibility as easily as we can raise taxes and blood-pressures in others, we'd be richer by far than we are today. One of the first things I did when teaching my daughter to drive was to take her out in a large dirt parking lot and have her floor the accelerator, slam on the brakes, and do skids intentionally, just show she would be able to knwo and respect the limits and behaviors of the machine at the extremes. She's never had an accident yet. Knock on wood. But the point is that she understood something about the machine she was running. It's a LOT easier to be responsible for something when you understand it. A |
Subject: RE: BS: speed restrictions in cars From: McGrath of Harlow Date: 19 Dec 06 - 01:35 PM Well, yes - but... If we didn't have machines that drive at potentially lethal speeds, human fallibility and stupidity wouldn't be the same problem. If some daydreaming character, or someone tearing along as fast as they can go, bumps into you, that's not a big problem if you're both on foot. Even with horses, the chances are quite good no one will be too seriously injured. It's very different when motor vehicles are involved. So we've introduced technology that makes trivial accidents fatal. Balancing that with technology which does something to balance that makes sense to me. As I pointed out, our top speed as un-amplified human beings is maybe 23 miles an hour. Those are the kind of reaction times we are really geared for. If all drivers would use their heads, it'd be great - but it's not going to happen, though we could probably get a lot closer to achieving it; there are a lot of people who shouldn't ever be allowed in a driving seat, or not for a good few years. That's why it's a good idea to do stuff that reduces the danger and the damage .......................... I've seen those broken bits in the guard rails or the stone barrier on high roads myself too, in Spain and Italy especially. If I had to drive on roads like that, I'd just tuck in behind the slow lorry, and take as long as it took to actually get to where I wanted to get to. I don't trust my ESP. |
Subject: RE: BS: speed restrictions in cars From: Midchuck Date: 19 Dec 06 - 01:43 PM What about the issue of introducing a requirement for speed limiters, and people keeping their old cars instead of buying new ones, because they didn't want the limiter? It could cause a recession or depression. Peter |
Subject: RE: BS: speed restrictions in cars From: Phot Date: 19 Dec 06 - 02:36 PM Speed limiters on coaches in the UK are set at 65 mph,+or- 5%, so the next National Express coach you might be in may just be doing 69 mph! If you want a really scary coach ride, try Algeria, India, Beruit, Oman, Egypt, Bahrain, or Dubai as I have in the past few months! It's not the speed, but the style, and aggressiveness of the drivers! Wassail! Chris |
Subject: RE: BS: speed restrictions in cars From: jacqui.c Date: 19 Dec 06 - 02:41 PM Phot - found that in Tunisia - a really scary cab ride! Drivers in Southern Italy, in particular, seemed to have that aggresive streak built in - we saw more accidents there in three days than in the whole of numerous trhee week trips to the continent. |
Subject: RE: BS: speed restrictions in cars From: Amos Date: 19 Dec 06 - 02:59 PM Oh, yes...also in Oaxaca, Malaysia coming up from Singapore, and Morocco. Those bus drivers will put the fear of eternity into you in no time flat! A |
Subject: RE: BS: speed restrictions in cars From: kendall Date: 19 Dec 06 - 02:59 PM I was riding a motor bike in St. Maartin, on my side of the road going at a reasonable speed when a native came at me on a curve. His speed wasn't as much of a problem as his being on MY side of the road. I ended up in a rock pile with the bike on top of me.He did stop and apologize, but if he spoke English he pretended he didn't. I haven't ridden since. |
Subject: RE: BS: speed restrictions in cars From: Amos Date: 19 Dec 06 - 03:04 PM You could have taken his side, Kendall! :D Just set in yer ways, I guess... :D A |
Subject: RE: BS: speed restrictions in cars From: McGrath of Harlow Date: 19 Dec 06 - 03:15 PM Perhaps he was English, and driving on the English side of the road, but felt embarrassed. (That actually happened to a mate of my son, off on holiday to France. Woke up in the morning, roared off on the left hand side as per normal...) |
Subject: RE: BS: speed restrictions in cars From: Peace Date: 19 Dec 06 - 03:19 PM There are already speed restriction devices in cars. They're called drivers. |
Subject: RE: BS: speed restrictions in cars From: Big Phil Date: 19 Dec 06 - 06:16 PM I think a guy with a red flag should walk at the front of every car on the road, any danger, flag is waved, driver sees flag, slows from 5mph to 1mph, danger averted, simple....... |
Subject: RE: BS: speed restrictions in cars From: Bobert Date: 19 Dec 06 - 06:38 PM Here in Virgina they have signs up that read "Speed Limits Enforced from Aircraft" but ya' ever see a Preditor take out a Lexus SUV in the Beltway??? Well, Hell no, ya' don't... Bluff, bluff, bluff... Yeah, take out a couple of these speeders with Preditors or F-16's and guess what??? Speedin' will end... As fir makin' folks drive VW's??? Another good idea but then you'd have folks fallin' thru all them rusty floor boards which would create a big ol' mess... Plus, ol' VeeDubs is fir true hippies and not the wnatabees... Bobert (true hippie...) |
Subject: RE: BS: speed restrictions in cars From: GUEST,petr Date: 19 Dec 06 - 07:02 PM back in the 70s after the arab oil embargo, the US govt brought in the 55mph speed limit on the highways, and the overall #of traffic fatalities dropped significantly. regarding the left and right side of the road.. (thread drift) my grandfather drove an oxcart for a brewery in wartime Czechoslovakia. THe Czechs drove on the left as in England, but when the Germans came they immediately switched all traffic over to the right. Which was ok for vehicles, but the darned oxen kept going over to the left side. Eventually they got to an intersection where a german soldier yelled at him to get them over to the right, he gave up and handed the reins to the soldier and walked away. |
Subject: RE: BS: speed restrictions in cars From: McGrath of Harlow Date: 19 Dec 06 - 07:38 PM Thevbloke with a red flag was brought in for steamrollers on the roads. And for steamrollers it was a pretty good idea. |
Subject: RE: BS: speed restrictions in cars From: Bert Date: 19 Dec 06 - 08:01 PM I think that drivers would respect speed limits more if they were realistic, and not traps set to gain income for the local authorities. How can you you expect Joe Soap to know which speed limit is set for the road conditions and which is a speed trap? |
Subject: RE: BS: speed restrictions in cars From: McGrath of Harlow Date: 19 Dec 06 - 09:15 PM What difference does it make for the driver? The penalty is going to be the same either way if you're caught breaking it. More significantly, the penalty points that risk your driving licence. (Or do you have those in the USA?) |
Subject: RE: BS: speed restrictions in cars From: Sooz Date: 20 Dec 06 - 02:42 AM Two things missing from driver training are patience and imagination. No-one has to overtake - it's a choice. |
Subject: RE: BS: speed restrictions in cars From: Paul Burke Date: 20 Dec 06 - 03:37 AM "I think that drivers would respect speed limits more if they were realistic, and not traps set to gain income for the local authorities." So you always drive within the speed limit, even when there's not a speed camera there? I woder why people buy these detector devices. |
Subject: RE: BS: speed restrictions in cars From: s&r Date: 20 Dec 06 - 04:07 AM Not quite steamrollers Kevin - steam driven vehicles preceded the internal combustion engine on the road "The Early Days Prior to the appearance of the first railways in Britain, there was a brief development and interest in steam powered road going vehicles. In 1834, a Mr Hancock started a steam coach called the "Era", carrying up to 14 passengers from Paddington to Regents Park and the City at 6d a head. In the following year, a Mr Church built an omnibus capable of carrying 40 passengers for the London and Birmingham Steam Carriage Company. However, the success of the railway movement drove all such traffic off the roads. A Parliamentary Commission of Enquiry in 1836 reported "strongly in favour of steam carriages on roads", but subsequent Acts of Parliament tended to have a discouraging and restrictive effect. The Locomotive Act 1861 limited the weight of steam engines to 12 tonnes and imposed a speed limit of 10 mph. The Locomotive Act 1865 set a speed limit of 4 mph in the country and 2 mph in towns. The 1865 Act also provided for the then famous "man with a red flag". Walking 60 yards ahead of each vehicle, a man with a red flag or lantern enforced a walking pace, and warned horse riders and horse drawn traffic of the approach of a self propelled machine. The Locomotive Amendment Act 1878 made the red flag optional under local regulations, and reduced the distance of the warning to a more manageable 20 yards. But this did not make life much easier for the motorist. Although British engineers were working on electrical and combustion engines, and motor vehicles had been patented as early as 1882, they were never developed." Stu |
Subject: RE: BS: speed restrictions in cars From: Rowan Date: 20 Dec 06 - 05:02 AM When I was taught to drive (6X6 trucks and Landrovers in the CMF) I was told that the most lethal part of the vehicle was the nut holding the steering wheel. While the "predicted" shortage of fossil fules may limit the effects of testosterone poisoning it won't eliminate it; that Sunracer (all photovoltaics) shot down the Stuart Highway faster than I could in my LandCruiser. At the moment, that highway has no speed limits in the Northern Territory (outside townships) but you wouldn't want to drive much faster than 60kph (~32mph) after dark, cos the kangaroos, camels, water buffalo and feral horses don't wear reflectors. The global nature of the economy may yet ameliorate some of the technical attributes of vehicles so that everybody gets something they want and something else they'll just have to put up with. The Australians (Victorians, actually) led the push for seat belts after the iron fist of the guy in charge of building the Snowy Mtns Hydro Scheme demonstrated their use reduced driver fatalities to 1/3 of the rate at other, similar, events. The Americans dragged the chain on this, preferring freedom of speech or the ability to remain unrestrained, but they are leading the push for zero atmosphere pollution from exhausts. Anyone who wants to sell vehicles into those (and other markets), like the Japanese, builds such technology into everything they sell. Of course, whether the Americans actuallu use the anchors for seat belts, or the Australians actually keep their vehicles tuned to emit zero pollution is another matter. But I think the hip pocket nerve will have more dampening effect on the mass of drivers than any special technology. Semitrailers in Australia (articulated vehicles that Americans call 18 wheelers, although ours have 22; I'm not sure what Europeans and Brits call them) routinely are fitted with speed limiters that limit their speed to 100kph (~60mph); they even have signs on them advertising the fact and I know they have recorders logging about 10 different parameters including speed. But most of them overtake me at a handsome clip when my speedo indicates I'm doing 100 clicks. The only heavy vehicles I've seen religiously stick to speed limits are the Northern Territory Road Trains, where one prime mover pulls three 'semi' trailers behind it, making a total vehicle length of ~50 metres. They are required to reach 80kph, from a standing start, in about 500 metres and cruise at 80kph. They can be a devil to overtake (or even pass, on some roads) but you can be sure that they'll clear the road of any slow moving beasts that don't get out of their way. So I'm happy to stick behind them. Cheers, Rowan |
Subject: RE: BS: speed restrictions in cars From: kendall Date: 20 Dec 06 - 09:16 AM A Maine state trooper stopped a woman from Massachusettes for speeding. As he was writing the ticket, she said sarcastically, "Don't you cops ever give warnings"? He answered, "Yes, there's one right there" pointing to a sign that said SPEED LIMIT 35. |
Subject: RE: BS: speed restrictions in cars From: McGrath of Harlow Date: 20 Dec 06 - 09:22 PM I've never understood why speed cameras aren't concealed. As it is, it implicitly invites people to drive at speed everywhere else, and slow down for the cameras. |
Subject: RE: BS: speed restrictions in cars From: Peace Date: 20 Dec 06 - 10:02 PM It should be noted too that the posted speeds are maximums. WHEN IT IS SAFE TO DRIVE THE MAXIMUM! If the roads are icy and you're doing the limit, you are breaking the law. |
Subject: RE: BS: speed restrictions in cars From: Dazbo Date: 21 Dec 06 - 10:09 AM Two of the many things that really piss me off about speed cameras are that 1) you can be pissed out of your head but if you're doing less that 30 the camera will not get you but on an open, clear road you'll get busted for doing 34 perfectly sober and safely and 2) vehicles pulling trailers that are limited by law to 60 can break their speed limit by 10 with impunity and be a damned sight more dangerous than a car doing 80 (based on UK speed limits of 30mph and 70mph) ps touch wood I've not yet been busted for speeding. |
Subject: RE: BS: speed restrictions in cars From: McGrath of Harlow Date: 21 Dec 06 - 02:24 PM Well, you can't very well expect a speed camera to carry out a breath-test on every passing driver who might be drunk. You could just as well say that it's wrong that bank robbers who don't speed don't get picked up. What annoys me is when they don't clearly enough indicate the limit. The only time I've been done for speeding was on a local road where there is a stretch which is 40 mph in between a pretty well identical stretch that is 50 and another that is National Speed Limit (ie 55). It is indicated, but only when you are entering it, and it's easy to miss the small sign. But I should have been looking more carefully. |
Subject: RE: BS: speed restrictions in cars From: Dazbo Date: 21 Dec 06 - 04:21 PM That's why 1) pisses me off, MoH. The cameras are there 'for our safety' yet only penalise one type of unsafe driving whilst ignoring others, which may be more hazardous. They have replaced a human with a machine but that machine isn't capable of doing the full job. |
Subject: RE: BS: speed restrictions in cars From: McGrath of Harlow Date: 21 Dec 06 - 04:31 PM Such as being over the drink limit? How could any camera spot that? How could a human being for that matter? After all, most people who are over the drink limit don't veer all over the road in an obvious way. It's more a question of having slower reactions, so that in a crisis they take longer to stop or take evasive action, and they crash into something. Similar to what happens when a sober driver is driving too fast - the same result, but achieved by a different mechanism. |
Subject: RE: BS: speed restrictions in cars From: kendall Date: 21 Dec 06 - 09:22 PM At the time, I'd been driving for 55 years. I got stopped for speeding. I was guilty, and I paid the fine, I did not winge. |
Subject: RE: BS: speed restrictions in cars From: HuwG Date: 22 Dec 06 - 07:05 AM Speed cameras ought to be made capable of detecting (among other things): - failure to maintain correct distance between vehicles ("tailgating"), particularly on motorways; - use of mobile phone by drivers; - throwing of litter from vehicles; Desirable, but probably not possible with current technology are: - driving while under the influence of alcohol; - driving while under the influence of any other controlled substance; - driving while under the influence of testosterone; I rather suspect that there will be too much resistance to any statutory legal limitation of the top speed of a car, but it will be possible to price oversouped cars off the road by a progressively higher road tax for faster cars, increased insurance rates etc. For example, in the late 1970's, teenaged motorcyclists (who were wrapping themselves around trees with alarming regularity) were effectively priced off the road by the inability to obtain insurance, long before the current regulations which make it difficult to obtain a legal licence to ride a high-powered motorcycle. Incidentally, I was once fined £40 and collected three penalty points on the licence for speeding (42 mph in a 30 mph zone). This was in 1994, but I ought perhaps to appeal, since the speed limit on the stretch of road where this occurred was later raised to 40 mph. This is a very rare event in the UK, but it was a road which approached a dual carriageway. Cars proceeding at 30 mph into the dual carriageway with a limit of 60 mph suddenly found themselves in a jostling pack of frantically accelerating vehicles, rather like the dash into the first bend of a Formula 1 race. Raising the speed limit reduced bunching and actually cut down the number of accidents. |
Subject: RE: BS: speed restrictions in cars From: McGrath of Harlow Date: 22 Dec 06 - 07:36 AM ...I ought perhaps to appeal Whether the speed limit was too low is irrelevant. The offence involved is that of exceeding the speed limit that exists. |
Subject: RE: BS: speed restrictions in cars From: The Fooles Troupe Date: 23 Dec 06 - 07:41 AM The NT is currently abolishing the unrestricted speed limit. My 'shopping trolley' is an 81 Charade. Front WD 50-55 mpg on the highway (100 km/hr - 60 mph) fully laden - 3 cylinder 900 ccs.... :-) it has even been known on the odd occassion to be capable enough to exceed 130 km/hr... but being very light - it is relatively easy to stop - even without power braking or power steering. Runs on unleaded, no emission 'afterburner' - just keep it well tuned! I did partake in motor sport (mainly dirt or grass - you can do on dirt at 30-40 mph what you need 90-100 mph on tarmac to do...) when much younger in my Fiat 128 (1200 cc) - it never went fast enough in good conditions to outdrive the road conditions.... and could outdrive Falcon 500's on mountain roads... :-) especially in the rain... |
Subject: RE: BS: speed restrictions in cars From: s&r Date: 23 Dec 06 - 02:37 PM National speed limit is 60mph for non motorways or dual carriageways (diagonal bar on white background) Stu |
Subject: RE: BS: speed restrictions in cars From: s&r Date: 23 Dec 06 - 02:38 PM PS UK Stu |
Subject: RE: BS: speed restrictions in cars From: Big Phil Date: 23 Dec 06 - 03:24 PM Here in the UK many so called safety cameras are nothing more than cash cows for a Government which is obsessed in taking money from us by stealth. As a truck driver I have seen hundreds of the bloody things which are placed in areas doing nothing for safety, but doing the maximum for fund collection, this is what pisses people off the most. As for speed limits, most are now outdated as they were set in the days of cars with drum brakes which did take a week to stop from 60mph, the modern car is now much advanced in the braking department. By the way I have no axe to grind, as an HGV driver for 30 years with a clean license, and never been done for speeding...... |
Subject: RE: BS: speed restrictions in cars From: McGrath of Harlow Date: 23 Dec 06 - 03:54 PM Safety cameras aren't relevant in themselves. Whether the camera is there or not the speed limit is the same. If it's too low the right thing to do is to try to get it changed, and keep within it until then. Hidden mobile cameras would make more sense than fixed ones. They could probably get away with fewer of them to achieve the same result - and spend the money on better signs indicating the speed limit, and warning that speed cameras are liable to be watching if we break it. Brakes may have improved, but drivers haven't. However good the brakes are, they can't start working until the driver has applied them - and the faster the car, the more distance will have been covered in the meantime. |
Subject: RE: BS: speed restrictions in cars From: HuwG Date: 23 Dec 06 - 08:55 PM As might be imagined, BBC's "Top Gear" team had some harsh things to say about speed cameras. They reckoned that the death rate on the roads had not fallen by any statistically detectable amount, while the fines collected from speeding drivers snapped by Mr. Gatso (a well-known brand of camera) had increased fourfold. They therefore concluded that the stated reason for their deployment was nonsense. I believe that the Institute of Advanced Drivers concluded (from what source or reasoning, I don't know) that speed cameras had saved perhaps 20 lives. On the other hand a judge in Birmingham wondered whether they hadn't actually caused some accidents (passing judgement on two motorists convicted of driving without due care and attention, through gazing upwards looking for the camera rather than at the sharply decelerating cars in front of them). Other instances where I believe the authorities have had to backtrack on ill-advised "safety" measures, were a yellow grid (which drivers may not enter unless they can exit it, designed to prevent traffic jams at junctions), in London which was so huge that nobody could legally enter it. A driver who had sat for ten minutes waiting for a clear exit was told by a PC to move or he would be charged with obstruction, entered and was promptly snapped by an enforcement camera. Incidentally, I should add to my list of driving offences which should be made detectable by camera: - cutting right-hand bends (far, far too common in my experience); - driving while under the influence of peroxide; - driving in the manner of Starsky and Hutch, with pounding adrenaline-charged seventies rock music on the cassette player. **** "Excuse me miss. Would you mind blowing into this bag?" "Of course not, officer, but why? I wasn't breaking any speed limits." "No miss, but I want to cool my chips down." **** "Excuse me madam, but you were exceeding the speed limit back there." "But officer, I thought you never arrested pretty women motorists." "Correct, madam. You do not have to say anything unless you wish to do so, but anything you do say ..." |
Subject: RE: BS: speed restrictions in cars From: kendall Date: 24 Dec 06 - 08:59 AM I see the cameras as a joke. You get plenty of warning that there is one just ahead, so how numb do you have to be to get caught speeding? In addition, they do nothing about aggressive drivers, drunks or tail gaters. The cash cow thing doesn't apply here because the fines do not go to the town in which they are levied. |
Subject: RE: BS: speed restrictions in cars From: JohnInKansas Date: 24 Dec 06 - 12:07 PM Re the hidden or visible speed cameras. We don't have either in my town, but we do have police radar. A few vehicles are probably still equipped with "fixed mounted" units, but mostly they're hand-held jobs that can be used in any vehicle - visibly marked or unmarked. One may pick up the local newspaper, or listen to any of several radio stations to get a 24-hour notice of where the "scheduled radars" will be located for the day. The information often includes "hours of operation." Only rarely, there may be "unscheduled" radar observers randomly about in the town. The publishing of the daily radar locations is with the complete "blessing" of the police, on grounds that being reminded daily that "they're out there" has a positive effect on the observance of speed limits by the majority of the driving population. Almost everyone accepts that there will be those "exceptional people" who will speed regardless of what's done short of catching them in the act and assessing appropriate fines and/or other penalties. We have a lot of those here too. John |
Subject: RE: BS: speed restrictions in cars From: kendall Date: 24 Dec 06 - 12:42 PM We have a few unmarked cars that don't look anything like cruisers; for instance, A red Camaro, or a black Dodge. The state of Maine spends tens of thousands of dollars to put up warning signs such as, SPEED LIMIT 35, so, if you get grabbed for doing 50, whos fault is it? The cop doesn't get a dime of that fine either. I have no sympathy for anyone who thinks the law doesn't apply to them. At 60 mph you are going 88 feet per SECOND. It takes a full second to even see a problem, and depending on your age, another half a second to react, and another 240 feet to stop. That's why we have speed limits. |
Subject: RE: BS: speed restrictions in cars From: McGrath of Harlow Date: 24 Dec 06 - 03:12 PM they do nothing about aggressive drivers, drunks or tail gaters. No and they don't make sure our tyres are pumped up, or that we remembered our wedding anniversary and tied up our shoe laces. They have their limitations - they just spot people who are driving faster than the local speed limit. True enough, drunks, aggressive drivers and tailgaters are menaces. But the danger from all those menaces is amplfied when the speed is higher, especially the last. My general policy if someone is driving too close behind me is to slow down, if possible. (I'd like to see an instrument which would vigorously alert drivers when they are driving too close to the car ahead for the speed at which they are going.) As for people being distracted by looking around for speed cameras, or slowing down when they come up to them and speeding the rest of the time, those things happen because speed cameras are forced to advertise their presence. Drive within the limit and you never need to worry about speed cameras. |
Subject: RE: BS: speed restrictions in cars From: kendall Date: 24 Dec 06 - 06:18 PM If someone is tailgating me I used to touch the brake lightly, but one time a woman saw me just in time to avoid hitting me. She jumped on the brakes and nearly lost control of her car. Now, if someone is too close, I simply turn on my windshield washers and much of the liquid goes over the top of the car and onto the followers windshield. They usually back off. |
Subject: RE: BS: speed restrictions in cars From: Bonecruncher Date: 24 Dec 06 - 09:12 PM McGrath of Harlow Regarding your post of 19th December, you make the comment about a " small spped limit sign sign". In UK speed limit signs must be of a particular size at the beginning and ending of a limited stretch of road, with smaller repeater signs at regular intervals, depending upon whether or not the street is lit and the distance between lamp standards. All local authorities have to abide by these national requirements. Any failure by the local authority can deem the signing to be confusing and any relevant court case should throw out the case. In the same vein, I have noticed that there are a number of areas in UK with 30 mph signs on unlit roads. I was taught during all of my tests (ordinary driving licence, Public Service Vehicle Class 1, Heavy Goods Vehicle Class 1, and Police Class 1) that a 30 mph limit was demarcated by street lights at no more than 200 yard (metre) intervals and the conventional 30 mph signs. Could someone with a legal bent please tell me if the "rules" have changed to allow 30 limits on unlit streets. Also are the speed limit signs flanked by yellow backgrounds legal? Where is the government information to motorists? Colyn. |
Subject: RE: BS: speed restrictions in cars From: kendall Date: 25 Dec 06 - 07:16 AM It's too bad we need signs at all. If people would use their heads they would be unnecessary. |
Subject: RE: BS: speed restrictions in cars From: s&r Date: 26 Dec 06 - 06:34 AM It's all in here somewhere Stu |
Subject: RE: BS: speed restrictions in cars From: Peace Date: 26 Dec 06 - 07:56 PM From s&r's link. " (2) On an occasion where a vehicle is being used for fire brigade, ambulance, bomb or explosive disposal, national blood service or police purposes and the observance of the requirement specified in paragraph (1) would be likely to hinder the use of that vehicle for one of those purposes then, instead of that requirement, the requirement conveyed by the sign in question shall be that the vehicle shall not proceed beyond that sign in such a manner or at such a time as to be likely to endanger any person. " Clear as a fookin' bell. |
Subject: RE: BS: speed restrictions in cars From: catspaw49 Date: 26 Dec 06 - 08:43 PM TRANSFUSION Nervous Norvus ZZZZZZOOOOOOOOOOOOMMMMMMMMMMMM Tooling down the highway doing 79 I'm a twin-pipe papa and I'm feelin fine Hey man dig that--was that a red stop sign- (scrreeech-BANG!!tinkle) Transfusion transfusion I'm just a solid mess of contusions Never never never gonna speed again Slip the blood to me Bud I jump in my rod about a quarter to nine I gotta make a date with that chick of mine I cross the center line--man you gotta make time- (scrreeech-BANG!!tinkle) Transfusion transfusion Oh man I got the cotton-pickin convolutions Never never never gonna speed again Shoot the juice to me Bruce My foot's on the throttle and it's made of lead But I'm a fast-riding daddy with a real cool head I'm a-gonna pass a truck on the hill ahead- (scrreeech-BANG!!tinkle) Transfusion transfusion My red corpsuckles (sic) are in mass confusion Never never never gonna speed again Pass the crimson to me Jimson I took a little drink and I'm feelin right I can fly right over everything--everything in sight There's a slow-poking cat I'm gonna pass him on the right- (scrreeech-BANG!!tinkle) Transfusion transfusion I'm a real gone paleface and that's no illusion I'm-a never never never gonna speed again Pass the claret to me Barrett A-rollin down the mountain on a rainy day Oh when you see me coming better start to pray I'm a-cuttin up the road and I'm the boss all the way- (scrreeech-BANG!!tinkle) Transfusion transfusion Oh doc pardon me for this crazy intrusion I'm never never never gonna speed again Pump the fluid in me Louie I'm burning up the highway early this morn I'm passing everybody oh nothing but corn Man outa my way I don't drive with my horn- (scrreeech-BANG!!tinkle) Transfusion transfusion Oh nurse I'm gonna make a new resolution I'm never never never gonna speed again Put a gallon in me Alan Oh barnyard drivers are found in two classes Line-crowding hogs and speeding jackasses So remember to slow down today Hey daddy-o Make that type O, huh? Atta-boy Spaw (scrreeech-BANG!!tinkle) |
Subject: RE: BS: speed restrictions in cars From: Peace Date: 26 Dec 06 - 08:47 PM Got out really early from the factory Driving like a nut in the rain Dont think I was acting so hysterically But I didnt see a thing until it came Man the drunks were verbal in the takeaway Beating up the chinese at the counter I put a few inside me At the end of the day I took out my revenge On the revolution counter Crawling from the wreckage Crawling from the wreckage Youd think by now at least that Half my brain would get the message Crawling from the wreckage Crawling from the wreckage Into a brand new car In walks bud with his exploding nose Hed been giving it maximum today He shouted how the devil You in trouble I suppose But all you ever do is run away Turned up the motor into hyper-drive I wasnt gonna take any of that Dont get bright ideas about a suicide cause all I ever hear Is zoom wam bam past me Crawling from the wreckage Crawling from the wreckage Youd think by now at least that Half my brain would get the message Crawling from the wreckage Crawling from the wreckage Into a brand new car Crawling, crawling, crawling from the wreckage Crawling, crawling, crawling from the wreckage Crawling, crawling, crawling from the wreckage Crawling from the wreckage Crawling from the wreckage Bits of me are scattered In the trees and in the hedges Crawling from the wreckage Crawling from the wreckage Into a brand new car Nothing seem to happen that aint happened before I see it all through flashes of depression I dry up my drink and hear People running for the door God I make some kind of impression cause when Im disconnected from the driving wheel Im only half the man I should be But metal hitting metal isnt all I feel And everything is good as It possible could be Crawling from the wreckage Crawling from the wreckage Youd think by now at least that Half my brain would get the message Crawling from the wreckage Crawling from the wreckage Into a brand new car Crawling from the wreckage Crawling from the wreckage Bits of me are scattered In the trees and in the hedges Crawling from the wreckage Crawling from the wreckage Into a brand new car Crawling from the wreckage Crawling from the wreckage Crawling, crawling Crawling from the wreckage |
Subject: RE: BS: speed restrictions in cars From: catspaw49 Date: 26 Dec 06 - 08:58 PM HOT ROD LINCOLN Well you heard the story of the hot rod race That fatal day when the Ford and the Mercury went out to play Well this is the inside story and I'm here to say I was the kid that was a drivin' that Model A. Well it's got a Lincoln motor and it's really souped up But that Model A body makes it look like a pup Got 12 cylinders and uses them all With an overdrive that just won't stall. Got a 4 barrel carb and dual exhaust With a 4.11 gear you can really get lost Got safety tubes and I'm not scared 'Cause the brakes are good and the tires are fair. Well we left San Pedro late one night The moon and the stars were shinin' bright Everything went fine up the Grapevine Hill We was passin' cars, just like they was standin' still. When all of the sudden in the flick of an eye A Cadillac sedan had passed me by The remark was made, "There's the car for me" But by then the taillights was all you could see. Well the fellas ribbed me for bein' behind So I started to make that Lincoln unwind I took my foot off the gas And man alive, I shoved her down into overdrive I wound her up to 110 Twisted the speedometer cable right off the end I had my foot beat clear to the floor Said "That's all there is, there ain't no more." Went around a corner and I passed a truck Whispered a prayer, just for luck Fenders clickin' on the guard rail posts The guys beside me were white as ghosts. They said, "Boy I think you've lost your sense Them telephone poles look like a picket fence." Said "Slow down...I see spots Them lines in the road they just look like dots." Smoke was a rollin' outta' the back When I started to gain on that Cadillac Knew I could catch him and hoped I could pass But when I did, I be sure to UN-gas! Went around the corner with the tires on the side You could feel the tension, Man whadda' ride Said, "Hold on I gotta' license to fly" The Caddy pulled over...Let me go by Just about then a rod started knockin' Went down in a dip and started to rockin' Looked in my mirror and a red light was blinkin' Cops.....after my hot rod Lincoln Well they arrested me and they put me in jail Called my Pop to go my bail He said, "Son, you're gonna' drive me to drinkin' If you don't quit drivin' that Hot Rod Lincoln." Spaw - It's a favorite of Cletus, Buford and Paw |
Subject: RE: BS: speed restrictions in cars From: kendall Date: 26 Dec 06 - 10:33 PM A nut at the wheel, A peach on his right, A curve in the road, Fruite salad tonight. Burma Shave |
Subject: RE: BS: speed restrictions in cars From: Peace Date: 26 Dec 06 - 10:35 PM I was cruisin' in my Stingray late one night, When an XKE pulled up on the right He rolled down the window of his shiny new Jag, And challenged me then and there to a drag I said "You're on buddy -- my mill's running fine, Let's come off the line now at Sunset and Vine But I'll go you one better, if you've got the nerve, Let's race all the way -- to Dead Man's Curve" (Dead Man's Curve) is no place to play (Dead Man's Curve) you'd best keep away (Dead Man's Curve) I can hear 'em say: "Won't come back from Dead Man's Curve" The street was deserted late Friday night; We were buggin' each other while we sat out the light We both popped the clutch when the light turned green, You shoulda heard the whine from my screamin' machine! I flew past La Brea, Schwab's and Crescent Heights, And all the Jag could see were my six taillights He passed me at Doheny then I started to swerve, But I pulled her out and there we were - at Dead Man's Curve (Dead Man's Curve) is no place to play (Dead Man's Curve... [sounds of skids and crashes] ) (Spoken): "Well, the last thing I remember, Doc, I started to swerve And then I saw the Jag slide into the curve I know I'll never forget that horrible sight, I guess I found out for myself that everyone was right" Won't come back from Dead Man's Curve... (Dead Man's Curve) is no place to play (Dead Man's Curve) you'd best keep away (Dead Man's Curve) I can hear 'em say: "Won't come back from Dead Man's Curve" (Dead Man's Curve) is no place to play (Dead Man's Curve) you'd best keep away (Dead Man's Curve) I can hear 'em say: "Won't come back from Dead Man's Curve" (fade) |