Subject: RE: What is a Folk Song? From: The Sandman Date: 15 Feb 08 - 09:34 AM I sing traditional songs,because I enjoy them. They are also the songs that I think I perform best. I do include a few songs in my repertoire that are self penned or other peoples composed songs.,but approximately ninety per cent of my material is traditional. for my own amusement at home I sometimes sing a few blues etc.I believe that if people want to categorise me,it would not be inappropriate to call me a folksinger,have a listen to some samples at my website and make up your own minds.itwould not be appropriate to callme a Jazzsinger. http://www.dickmiles.com |
Subject: RE: What is a Folk Song? From: Brian Peters Date: 15 Feb 08 - 09:08 AM ...and can I add to Shimrod's comment the observation that very few of us sing traditional songs because we feel some obligation to preserve them (please note, all those of you like to introduce terms like 'aspic', 'museum curator', or even 'pedant' into the discussion). While I'm of course delighted that the interest of several of our most talented young performers should ensure their survival for another generation or so yet, the only proper reason for singing the old songs is because they're great songs. They have beautiful melodies and simple yet poetic lyrics, they speak of real life (give or take the odd dragon), they can move us to tears or laughter, and they can make the hairs rise on our necks. That's why we sing them. |
Subject: RE: What is a Folk Song? From: GUEST,Shimrod Date: 15 Feb 08 - 08:18 AM "But I would also prefer it if the music I love (probably far closer to yours than you realise) was listened to and understood by more than just a handful of aging baby boomers, and thus was given an opportunity to survive and flourish beyond their passing." This is, I suppose, a worthy sentiment. But I'm not sure that it will be achieved by adulteration or dilution. On the other hand when I decided, way back when, that I enjoyed listening to traditional songs and would like to try singing them myself, my primary motive was not to ensure their survival. If the survival of the songs is a by-product of my interest, then good, but if they don't survive then I doubt that anything that I could do, say or write will make an iota of difference. The forces invoked in the following quote by Brian Peter's, when responding to the question of why no folk songs were created in the 20th Century, are probably much more relevant: "Perhaps by pointing out that, on account of the penetration of the mass media into all aspects of the everyday lives of the general populace, no such thing as folksong (in the sense it used to be understood) exists at all, at least in that part of the world sometimes referred to as 'The West'." |
Subject: RE: What is a Folk Song? From: GUEST,Black Hawk Date: 15 Feb 08 - 06:56 AM irishenglish Captain, I don't necessarily agree. I know quite a bunch of younger musicians (in several genres), who play and sing. Usually guitar, but sometimes as is the case of a friend of mine, sings and plays trombone! If he's singing, where does he stick the trombone to play it :-) |
Subject: RE: What is a Folk Song? From: George Papavgeris Date: 15 Feb 08 - 06:22 AM Liam, I never heard anyone "claim that the whole Led Zep CD catalogue were folk songs if Eliza had done a wee on them". I have seen many people with chips on their shoulders, though. |
Subject: RE: What is a Folk Song? From: TheSnail Date: 15 Feb 08 - 05:44 AM "The term does not cover composed popular music that has been taken over ready-made by a community and remains unchanged, for it is the re-fashioning and re-creation of the music by the community that gives it its folk character." The problem with this is that the changes come about as the song is passed down through the aural tradition. It is learnt from singers within the community, not from the orginal. This can only happen if someone learns it in the first place; someone who thinks "That's a good song. I'll have that". The Plains of Waterloo must have been a contemporary song less than 200 years ago. |
Subject: RE: What is a Folk Song? From: GUEST,Liam Date: 15 Feb 08 - 05:30 AM There are some that would claim that the whole Led Zep CD catalogue were folk songs if Eliza had done a wee on them. Some of us apply different definitions. |
Subject: RE: What is a Folk Song? From: Brian Peters Date: 15 Feb 08 - 05:18 AM Oh, and secondly, for "Stairway" to be considered 'folk music' would require a degree of creative re-invention going beyond the (admittedly inspired) substitution of Jimmy Page by a wobble-board. |
Subject: RE: What is a Folk Song? From: Brian Peters Date: 15 Feb 08 - 05:07 AM Do Rolf Harris and a bunch of covers bands constitute "the community"? Trying to define things is fraught with danger, but without definitions words are meaningless and we can't communicate at all. |
Subject: RE: What is a Folk Song? From: GUEST,Nikkiwi Date: 15 Feb 08 - 05:02 AM going back to the 1954 definition for a moment... "The term does not cover composed popular music that has been taken over ready-made by a community and remains unchanged, for it is the re-fashioning and re-creation of the music by the community that gives it its folk character." Does this mean that a song like "Stairway to Heaven" (Led Zep) which has been covered god knows how many times, each in its own way (including once on a wobbleboard) DOES qualify as folk music, as it has been refashioned and re-created by the community??? Just a thought (both on folk music and the dangers of tying oneself to a definition) Nikkiwi |
Subject: RE: What is a Folk Song? From: Brian Peters Date: 15 Feb 08 - 04:42 AM >> Didn't we have a thread recently about what would be the folksongs of the future? << Very probably. I must look it up sometime; I daresay someone will have mentioned 'Happy Birthday', which is one song that - through its association with a specific celebration - continues to be passed orally down the generations. A fine example of a folk song, notwithstanding that we know the composer. >> I wouldn't be surprised if "Ride Sally Ride", "Johnny be Good" and "American Pie" ended up there. << But again, how many people not into karaoke or a covers band could sing a single verse of any of those - particularly 'American Pie', which has a memorable chorus but pretty complicated verses? And those songs are at most fifty years old. Many old pop songs retain widespread familiarity - for now, at least - because they're continually recycled by the nostalgia industry, appearances in film soundtracks and - most spectacularly if bizarrely - the annual churning out of the 1970s / 80s Christmas Soundtrack. But there again, although my kids are familiar to the point of exhaustion with 'Merry Christmas Everybodee', how many of my generation or theirs could actually sing any more than the chorus and maybe that single line about hanging up the stocking? We are forced passively to listen to those songs - no-one has adopted them as their own, in the way that several generations cherished 'Barbara Allen' or 'The Farmer's Boy'. G2G - back to those Child Ballads. |
Subject: RE: What is a Folk Song? From: Bert Date: 15 Feb 08 - 01:48 AM The comment about American Idol was that the people don't seem at all embarassed. Brian, the best karaoke singers don't really need the prompter. Didn't we have a thread recently about what would be the folksongs of the future? While we can't accurately predict the future, I wouldn't be surprised if "Ride Sally Ride", "Johnny be Good" and "American Pie" ended up there. |
Subject: RE: What is a Folk Song? From: Gene Burton Date: 14 Feb 08 - 07:20 PM "...I would prefer it if the music I love is not 'colonised' by rock and pop music". Me too. But I would also prefer it if the music I love (probably far closer to yours than you realise) was listened to and understood by more than just a handful of aging baby boomers, and thus was given an opportunity to survive and flourish beyond their passing. (Then again, does any of this ultimately matter? It does to me, though frankly at times I wish it didn't.) |
Subject: RE: What is a Folk Song? From: Brian Peters Date: 14 Feb 08 - 06:47 PM George, There's a wonderful scene in the Watersons film 'Travelling For A Living", showing a scene from a pub in Hull during the 1960s, in which the entire clientele is indulging in a rip-roaring sing- song. Like Bert, I can remember several pubs in the East End of London, and one or two in North Manchester, which during the 1970s still employed a pianist - and where folk in the room would sometimes feel moved to join in . My grandmother sang songs (mostly hymns, admittedly, but she did know several verses to 'Cosher Bailey's Engine', which I'm told is a real folksong)) around the house all the time. My Mum and Dad sang a lot for their own amusement, too. As Peter Bellamy remarked in the 1980s, in an article on our present topic, lots of people as late as the 60s used to sing or whistle about their everyday work. My parents' generation went regularly to chapel and sang their hearts out. I didn't but was still expected to sing hymns at school assembly. I would suggest that all of this has disappeared. We still have football chants, vestiges of children's playground rhymes, and songs at a few surviving rural socials such as shepherds' meets, and also the village carolling in Yorkshire (although whether the locals outnumber travelling folkies is a moot point). News reports, meanwhile, bemoan the fact that parents no longer sing nursery rhymes to their children. I too have doubts about whether every ploughboy knew scores of old ballads, but I suspect that many rural and urban people knew and sang at least some songs, a hundred years ago. Flora Thompson wrote about agricultural communities singing in the fields. During my short experience of a production line in the 1970s, we were piped Radio 1 at high volume. No opportunity for work songs there. I must plead ignorance of 'JCB', but I do remember that several years ago, the case was made regularly that 'Yellow Submarine' was a modern folksong because people would sing it spontaneously. My feeling was that many people could and indeed did sing the seven-word chorus, but that only a tiny number would know the lyrics to even one verse. And my kids would scarcely recognize 'Yellow Submarine' forty years down the line. George has already answered Bert's point about 'American Idol' - that it's is about self-promotion, not informal or communal entertainment, and it's goldfish bowl TV, not a participatory mass movement. Karaoke, though an interesting social phenomenon, is part of the same thing. I'd be more inclined to accept karaoke as modern folksong if the singers didn't require a prompter. Songwriters like George, who compose finely crafted and heartfelt songs, may well find their work absorbed by the folksong community - a self-selected body that still holds dear the unquestionable value of singing for fun - in a way analagous to what some of us call 'the traditional process'. But with all due respect, I don't think I'm ever going to hear the window cleaner singing one from the top of his ladder. I would love to know which songs Bert believes will be "the folksongs of the future". |
Subject: RE: What is a Folk Song? From: George Papavgeris Date: 14 Feb 08 - 06:37 PM I don't disagree, Bert, and it doesn't invalidate the argument. I was referring to the majority, such as we have seen in "the Choir" recently. And perhaps the non-singing ones were always a majority anyway. But some people DO sing - which is where we agree. |
Subject: RE: What is a Folk Song? From: irishenglish Date: 14 Feb 08 - 06:21 PM Captain, I don't necessarily agree. I know quite a bunch of younger musicians (in several genres), who play and sing. Usually guitar, but sometimes as is the case of a friend of mine, sings and plays trombone! |
Subject: RE: What is a Folk Song? From: Bert Date: 14 Feb 08 - 06:15 PM ...most people are embarassed to sing today... Haven't you watched American Idol George;-) People are singing today. When I was a kid it would be at a party at home or around a piano in the pub. Now it's Karaoke and Open Mics. But folks are still out there singing even though these venues don't fit the 1954 definition. The songs that they remember and sing to their kids will be the folksongs of the future. |
Subject: RE: What is a Folk Song? From: The Sandman Date: 14 Feb 08 - 04:48 PM My experience tells me,many youngsters today who play instruments,Do not sing. I find this bizarre,particuarly if the pupil wishes to learn the Guitar,but it is the case here in this part of Ireland. |
Subject: RE: What is a Folk Song? From: George Papavgeris Date: 14 Feb 08 - 04:03 PM Brian, you started a trail of thought in my migraine-box: Like you, I often bemoan the fact that "people just don't sing any more", yet we both know some people who sing, a precious few. And I wonder: Is the ratio of singers vs passive listeners that much different now, from the past? Surely not every ploughboy was vocally gifted, not every market gardener or flock-tender. Those (few?) that were, were sought after and asked to do their bit when occasion arose, and the majority (? I am guessing of course) simply enjoyed listening to them. Yes, there has been a tendency towards manufactured music (famous line of a Harvey Andrews' young admirer: "was this song you sang yours, or was it proper music, on CD and that...?". Yes, most people are embarassed to sing today, and they are made to think that to be a singer you have to look good, wear bling and such. But vocalisation of one's feelings is too close to the surface as a skill to be suppressed for long. So perhaps, just perhaps, my (and your) doomsaying is off the mark. Perhaps a song like Nizlopi's JCB one, born of personal experience and echoing the sentiments of listeners, when it is sung by youngsters on the return of a coach trip, is simply undergoing a sort of "folk process". It may not be what you and I would call a "folk song" because it does not match the prototypes of form or structure we have in our minds/experience, but then, how much does our opinion matter on the subject? It's a cliche, but "this thing is bigger than both of us"...(the folk process, I mean). Perhaps we are too close and inspecting the trees, to appreciate the wood - even as rainforests are disappearing (beat that for mixing metaphors!). Or to quote a great 20th century philosopher: "It could be folk, Brian, but not as we know it!" |
Subject: RE: What is a Folk Song? From: GUEST,The Mole Catcher's Apprentice Date: 14 Feb 08 - 03:00 PM "The sad fact is that scarcely anyone sings any more" I think someone used a line in a song that had very similar sentiments to this.... Charlotte (thinking on Ma and Pa's piano stool |
Subject: RE: What is a Folk Song? From: Brian Peters Date: 14 Feb 08 - 02:47 PM "how do we explain to future generations why no folksongs were created in the 20th century?" Perhaps by pointing out that, on account of the penetration of the mass media into all aspects of the everyday lives of the general populace, no such thing as folksong (in the sense it used to be understood) exists at all, at least in that part of the world sometimes referred to as 'The West'. The sad fact is that scarcely anyone sings any more (we had the football chant debate on another thread, thanks). Not songs by Richard Thompson or Peter Bellamy, not Dylan or Donovan, not even the works John Lennon. If we choose to define 'folksong' as 'that which is sung in folk clubs' then of course the rules change. |
Subject: RE: What is a Folk Song? From: GUEST,Shimrod Date: 14 Feb 08 - 02:02 PM "Those who claim otherwise can reasonably be supposed to do so for their own nefarious and exclusivist purposes ..." "...nefarious and exclusivist purposes"! Now what might those be? One of the reasons why I tend to insist on the 1954 definition is because I would prefer it if the music I love is not 'colonised' by rock and pop music - which I can hear anywhere (often whether I want to hear it or not!). I suppose this could be interpreted as "exclusivist" (by the uncharitable) ... but "nefarious"?! |
Subject: RE: What is a Folk Song? From: Gene Burton Date: 14 Feb 08 - 01:40 PM "One thing I'd like to know - how do we explain to future generations why no folksongs were created in the 20th century?" This MUST be a joke, right? I doubt anybody SERIOUSLY believes that folk music is only formed free from recording technology, input from popular culture etc; because, like the Flat Earth movement, this flies in the face of reason, evidence and common sense. Those who claim otherwise can reasonably be supposed to do so for their own nefarious and exclusivist purposes, and thankfully only constitute a small minority even in folk clubs. A pity their influence on the direction (or rather lack thereof) of the folk "scene" as a whole (in the UK, at least) is rather disproportionate...it doesn't do much for awareness of/enthusiasm for our indigenous musical forms (including traditional folk song). |
Subject: RE: What is a Folk Song? From: Banjiman Date: 14 Feb 08 - 01:21 PM ....ah well they MIGHT be folk songs but no one will know until we are all dead. (as long as no one who can, read, write or has a CD/ MP3/ Record player has heard them or played them). Paul |
Subject: RE: What is a Folk Song? From: GUEST,The Mole Catcher's Apprentice Date: 14 Feb 08 - 01:08 PM "how do we explain to future generations why no folksongs were created in the 20th century?" by the 1954 definition.etc..etc there were none written The Transports - Peter bellamy or Richard Thompson and Dave Swarbrick. The Farewell, Farewell Crazy Man Michael Walk Awhile Sloth Doctor of Physick the list is pretty nrear endless when you start to think about it. Charlotte (they work for me, in the genre) |
Subject: RE: What is a Folk Song? From: GUEST, Sminky Date: 14 Feb 08 - 01:01 PM One thing I'd like to know - how do we explain to future generations why no folksongs were created in the 20th century? |
Subject: RE: What is a Folk Song? From: Gene Burton Date: 14 Feb 08 - 01:00 PM "...years of much abuse", indeed! I must stop blagging cigarettes off strangers whenever I've had a couple of beers... |
Subject: RE: What is a Folk Song? From: GUEST,The Mole Catcher's Apprentice Date: 14 Feb 08 - 12:50 PM Poor Old Hoarse Charlotte (out in the fields) |
Subject: RE: What is a Folk Song? From: Gene Burton Date: 14 Feb 08 - 12:44 PM We are not a horse definitioner. We have never (knowingly) defined a horse. HOARSE definitioner, on the other hand... (spent most of the day putting a new song through it's paces, and have blasted my vocal chords...) |
Subject: RE: What is a Folk Song? From: The Sandman Date: 14 Feb 08 - 11:39 AM one of my own compositions, The Battle of Bosworth Field,I know has changed.[but that is not the sole consideration in determining whether it is a folksong]. I am not sure how important the changing is in defining whether it is a folksong or not.[why should it even be adetermining factor?] if we look at the melodies of English Irish Scottish and Appalachian songs,they are in four different modes.,Dorian,Mixolydian,Aeolian and Ionian,therefore if we wrote a new song,to make it sound authentic a melody from thse modes. would be appropriate[amelody from the locrian mode would not sound authentic].,but to use this philosophy limits thecomposers melodic scope. then we come to lyrics,should we write in a style associated with a previous century. if I might quote Brian Peters from another thread Subject: RE: Folk clubs - what is being sung From: Brian Peters - PM Date: 13 Feb 08 - 02:10 PM >> "...depends on how well they are written" . This suggests to me that you are saying that "traditional" songs are inherently better than "modern" songs, except where you think that isn't the case? << I won't presume to speak for Jim, but perhaps what he meant was "depends on how well they succeed in mimicking traditional style" - which would assume that the writer was actually trying to make the song sound 'traditional' (and that depends on what we mean by 'traditional' - but let's not go there just now). Personally I would hope that someone with plenty of experience of the genre could spot a modern attempt to compose a song in the style of a Child Ballad, or indeed of a 19th-century English lyrical song - a modern composer would find it awkward to use the same kind of language, for a start. However, if you want an example of a modern song that did convince me, try Dave Webber's "Bonnet and Shawl", which is a dead ringer for a traditional song. His "Lady of Autumn", though, didn't fool me for a minute (and that's not to pass a value judgement on either). 'Bring Us A Barrel', another song often quoted as 'sounding traditional', would have deceived my ears twenty years ago, but having spent all the intervening period looking at the old songs, I doubt that it would if I heard it for the first time now. The songs of Leon Rosselson and Jim Woodland, to name but two, don't sound remotely traditional, but are great songs fully deserving a hearing in folk clubs. My own tastes would still prefer traditional songs to be in the majority, though.[end of quote] http:www//dickmiles.com |
Subject: RE: What is a Folk Song? From: GUEST,The Mole Catcher's Apprentice Date: 13 Feb 08 - 02:41 PM "Folk music is the product of a musical tradition that has been evolved through the process of oral transmission...etc..etc..." I wonder how long it took'em to make this up? Charlotte (busy tossing out alot of my sheet music) |
Subject: RE: What is a Folk Song? From: George Papavgeris Date: 13 Feb 08 - 10:29 AM "The term does not cover composed popular music that has been taken over ready-made by a community and remains unchanged, for it is the re-fashioning and re-creation of the music by the community that gives it its folk character". This statement has been misrepresented in the past by various people focusing on the "composed" and ignoring the "unchanged". What then of Webber's May Song or Parting Song, or of John Connolly's Fiddlers Green? Both have seen variation, both have been passed on orally in many cases (despite the fact that several recordings exist, some people still learn songs the old way)? Purists will tell us that these are not folk songs... I beg to differ. Further, the 1954 definition is arbitrary and imperfect, in my view, fashioned with the knowledge of the day and does not pass the test of time. The moment a collector records a source singer, the oral-transmission cycle is broken (something the definition conveniently, but erroneously, ignores); this shows the arbitrariness of the "oral" rule. But any definition that uses external trappings to define a social process is bound to be anchored to the time of its making and hence imperfect. It's like trying to describe dance as "the synchronous movement of body and limbs to the rhythm of accompanying mysic" - i.e. bollocks (think of marching, for example). Folk and its meanings are only expressed by the externalisations, and should not be defined by them. |
Subject: RE: What is a Folk Song? From: GUEST,The Singing Horse Date: 13 Feb 08 - 10:03 AM "Refresh, so that you can discuss your definition here and not clutter up the other thread"... Methinks the horse definitioners are gettin' a bit uppity, y'all! |
Subject: RE: What is a Folk Song? From: GUEST,Shimrod Date: 13 Feb 08 - 07:01 AM A very interesting book which attempts to explore the nature of oral culture and the effects of literacy on such a culture is David Buchan's 'The Ballad and the Folk' (first pub. 1972 by Routledge & Kegan Paul; repub. by Tuckwell Press, 1997). The book takes for its example the ballad tradition of North East Scotland. Certain aspects of its thesis are necessarily speculative and controversial but it provides plenty of food for thought all the same. I wonder if there's an equivalent (American?) book which looks at the effects of commercial recording technology on a 'traditional' culture (in the rural South of mid-twentieth century North America perhaps?). |
Subject: RE: What is a Folk Song? From: PoppaGator Date: 12 Feb 08 - 08:05 PM Songs that have been created since the invention of writing may not have to excluded from "the 1954 definition," but anything sung or heard since the development of recording technology is definitely excluded. I think that anyone alive today who believes that their favorite music is in any way "purer" or more "free of modern influence" than anything else is pretty much kidding themselves. Of course, I have no problem with anyone having different tastes and standards from anyone else. But let's be real, and admit that the influence of recorded music ~ including, of course, recordings of traditional singing, both commercial and acacdemic ~ is part of everyone's experience today. |
Subject: RE: What is a Folk Song? From: Bert Date: 12 Feb 08 - 07:51 PM Refresh, so that you can discuss your definition here and not clutter up the other thread. |
Subject: RE: What is a Folk Song? From: GUEST,Bert Date: 08 Feb 08 - 03:24 PM The trouble that I have with the "oral tradition - uninfluenced" bit is that it excludes any song that has been written since writing was invented and also any song that has been written since people have been singing. Because once writing was invented, people have been writing down songs. And since people have been singing together there must have been songs that were popular. But we are never going to win over the pedantic crowd so we need to find a definition of our own. I think we need to poll folk clubs and ask them to list the songs that were sung at their last meeting. This will tell us what songs are being sung that WE think are acceptable as folk songs. Then we can think up out own name for them. |
Subject: RE: What is a Folk Song? From: Gene Burton Date: 08 Feb 08 - 01:45 PM My take on the 1954 definition (cut n paste job from the John Lennon thread):- "Folk music is the product of a musical tradition that has evolved through the process of oral transmission"..."...music that has been evolved...by a community uninfluenced by popular and arts music". This being the case, it would follow that new folk songs can only be created in cultures where music playing/recording technology is wholly absent; and furthermore untouched by mass popular culture. Um, I think that only leaves the interior of Papua New Guinea and maybe the remoter parts of the Amazon rainforest...not a very positive prognosis for the continued existence of a living folk tradition in the Western world! Here endeth the lesson. |
Subject: RE: What is a Folk Song? From: Richard Bridge Date: 08 Feb 08 - 01:17 PM Bert, IMHO the Cap'n is right. But I imagine he thought it went without saying that you can sing exactly what you like, and the fact that a song is not a folk song dies not in any way make it inferior. I did suggest on another thread that we could call stuff in the style of folk but not meeting the defintion "neofolk" or "nu-folk" - sort of like "new country" or "nu-metal", but the horse brigade came out in force. What I don't understand is why, if they think (as I think they think) that the word has no meaning, they are so vehement that what they do falls within a different definition that is somehow the "correct" definition. |
Subject: RE: What is a Folk Song? From: The Sandman Date: 08 Feb 08 - 01:07 PM just keep on singing.but not in the rain. |
Subject: RE: What is a Folk Song? From: GUEST,Bert Date: 08 Feb 08 - 12:19 PM Well Captain Birdseye, that wipes out about 90% of my song list. I guess that we now need a definition for "What we sing". |
Subject: RE: What is a Folk Song? From: Peace Date: 08 Feb 08 - 12:16 PM That's certainly one way of lookin' at it. |
Subject: RE: What is a Folk Song? From: The Sandman Date: 08 Feb 08 - 12:13 PM Subject: RE: Dick Miles jazz singer From: Captain Birdseye - PM Date: 07 Feb 08 - 10:03 AM Subject: Isthe1954defining,improvable From: Captain Birdseye - PM Date: 21 Sep 07 - 03:51 AM Definition of Folk Music ,decided by the International Folk Music Council in 1954. Folk music is the product of a musical tradition that has been evolved through the process of oral transmission. The factors that shape the tradition are: (i) continuity which links the present with the past; (ii) variation which springs from the creative impulse of the individual or the group; and (iii) selection by the community, which determines the form or forms in which the music survives. The term can be applied to music that has been evolved from rudimentary beginnings by a community uninfluenced by popular and art music and it can likewise be applied to music which has originated with an individual composer and has subsequently been absorbed into the unwritten living tradition of a community. The term does not cover composed popular music that has been taken over ready-made by a community and remains unchanged, for it is the re-fashioning and re-creation of the music by the community that gives it its folk character."http://www.dickmiles.com |
Subject: RE: What is a Folk Song? From: Alec Date: 24 Jan 07 - 05:23 AM Does that make it a Folk thread? : ) |
Subject: RE: What is a Folk Song? From: GUEST,Sooz at work Date: 24 Jan 07 - 05:03 AM This thread has taken ten years to get to 100 posts! |
Subject: RE: What is a Folk Song? From: Alice Date: 16 Apr 02 - 11:22 PM The time machine - "What is a Folk Song" 1997 meets "What is a Folk Song" 2002. |
Subject: RE: What is a Folk Song? From: GUEST,Roger the skiffler Date: 30 Mar 01 - 05:00 AM Yet another of the things I know nothing about, but given that someone must have been the original singer-songwriter of every old song, how many generations must pass before it becomes a folk song? The Year 1300 :"That Ossian/Blondel- he's just a singer-songwriter". The year 2150: " the Alpha Centauri Jug band bring you traditional earth folksongs. This one is collected from Rick Fielding, the bard of Toronto, coming up a number from the pen of Matt R..." RtS (ignorance is bliss) |
Subject: RE: What is a Folk Song? From: dick greenhaus Date: 29 Mar 01 - 05:07 PM This is probably pointless to point out, BUT... There are many contexts for the use of the adjective "folk". It can be stylistic, historical, sociological... most of this argument (aside from the "never heard a horse" and the "I like it" idiocies) resembles a heated debate on whether an elephant is an animal, a vertebrate, Asiatic, a beast of burden or a pachyderm. Come to think of it, a lot of "folk" acts I've heard in recent years would improved by having horses do the singing.
|
Subject: RE: What is a Folk Song? From: Ruthie A Date: 29 Mar 01 - 04:03 PM I heard an interesting definition of 'folk' somewhere - folk music is exactly that - music of the people. It's the kind of thing that happen's in your next-door neighbour's kitchen, just because that's what you want to do. Apparently, making money out of this true folk music is very rare. Now, this can be subcategorised into other styles - Celtic, blues, bluegrass, country, Scandanavian - even jazz and ragtime. After all, these all drew their roots from music that was acessable to all. These are traditional music styles derived from folk, but they're only the real thing when performed in a traditional setting. Does that include festivals? I think my brain (which is now very cross with RE homework) is getting a bit overloaded. Personally, I can't define what folk is. I hadn't realised how difficult it was! Ruthie |
Subject: RE: What is a Folk Song? From: Thomas the Rhymer Date: 29 Mar 01 - 12:40 AM Ease of expression, elusive to buy Folksong connection, traditional sigh A join-in reaction, a friendly resolve with a chorus in action, in harmonies revolve Folk invites, unites, requites and rewrites
I wish I'd write a real traditional folk song Maybe the jingles are the true folk music of our day... |
Share Thread: |
Subject: | Help |
From: | |
Preview Automatic Linebreaks Make a link ("blue clicky") |