Subject: RE: Gallery of Mudcat Quotations From: Don(Wyziwyg)T Date: 11 Nov 05 - 09:16 PM Irrelevant to this thread. Please go away unless you have some quote from someone much wiser than I. Don T. |
Subject: RE: Gallery of Mudcat Quotations From: pdq Date: 11 Nov 05 - 09:31 PM The Shambles crusade against 'the machine' is great theatre, much enjoyed by some of us, but maybe it should be taken some place else. This thread already contains some quotation gems and will likely receive many more. If all of The Shambles' threads have been closed by Joe Offal, open a new one. The "Gallery of Mudcat Quotations" is too good to deserve this treatment. |
Subject: RE: Gallery of Mudcat Quotations From: The Shambles Date: 14 Nov 05 - 02:02 AM >Snip< Every totalitarian regime has started with the removal of some civil rights "for the protection of the public" from a perceived, or a manufactured threat. In each case the public has eventually been in need of protection from the regime itself. Is this the way forward? I don't believe it is. Don T. |
Subject: RE: Gallery of Mudcat Quotations From: Amos Date: 14 Nov 05 - 09:59 AM "It is kinda silly to place responsibility for your own happiness on some mystic chain of categories in the universe; you get the categories you make for yourself." moi |
Subject: RE: Gallery of Mudcat Quotations From: GUEST,Giok Date: 14 Nov 05 - 10:42 AM I vote that this thread is purged of all irrelevant to the title postings, mine included, it is being subverted by one man's paranoia. G. |
Subject: RE: Gallery of Mudcat Quotations From: wysiwyg Date: 14 Nov 05 - 10:46 AM Well my friend Giok, I believe I'll add a quote of my own. :~) ~S~ Subject: RE: BS: Hard-Working Ladies: Pampering Yourself? From: WYSIWYG - PM Date: 13 Nov 05 - 07:21 AM Feeding trolls is a lot like shitting on the floor in the middle of a nice hot sauna. Sure, you can do it-- but do you feel right about it, later? ~Susan |
Subject: RE: Gallery of Mudcat Quotations From: The Shambles Date: 15 Nov 05 - 06:09 AM Subject: RE: BS: Blairs first defeat From: Keith A of Hertford - PM Date: 15 Nov 05 - 02:09 AM >snip< As for the judges, they are made unsackable to ensure their independence. |
Subject: RE: Gallery of Mudcat Quotations From: Don(Wyziwyg)T Date: 15 Nov 05 - 06:44 AM Roger, How many years will it take to sink in, that you have NO civil rights here. None of us do. The only rights on Mudcat belong to Max. Joe and the Clones have duties allocated by Max, which they are obviously performing to his satisfaction. The rest of us are guests, and with the greatest respect, it ill behoves one who regularly subverts the threads of other people to complain about minor alterations to his own. Don T. P.S. Now cut and paste another of my comments out of context as usual. |
Subject: RE: Gallery of Mudcat Quotations From: John MacKenzie Date: 17 Nov 05 - 06:27 PM |
Subject: RE: More Noteworthy Mudcat Quotations From: The Shambles Date: 23 Nov 05 - 02:14 PM The thead that Amos refers to is the following Gallery of Mudcat Quotations. As to the reasons why it was subject to imposed censorship and closed by some anonymous volunteer fellow poster - I will leave for you to judge. It may have been because it was abused, by being used for a purpose for which it was not intended. |
Subject: RE: More Noteworthy Mudcat Quotations From: The Shambles Date: 23 Nov 05 - 06:17 PM It may have been because it was abused, by being used for a purpose for which it was not intended. Is the anonymous fellow poster responsible for the unwelcome insertion of this editing comment into my post and possibly also the one responsible for the imposed closure of the original thread wishing to make their name known and be prepared stand by their comments and actions? Like everyone else is expected and are generally prepared to do? It MAY have been subject to imposed closure for this reason - was it in fact subject to imposed closure for this reason and who was responsible for imposing this judgement? There would seem to be little point in closing a thread that is simply a collection contributions that can still be found in their original threads. As the purpose for which it was used until its imposed closure was its intended use for the placing of quotations that were of note. I am not sure how that can be any form of abuse - cause it to be relegated to the B/S and now anonymously subject to imposed closure..........Perhaps this can be explained to our forum?
Thank you. -Joe Offer- |
Subject: RE: More Noteworthy Mudcat Quotations From: Amos Date: 23 Nov 05 - 06:44 PM The earlier thread was closed, I presume because it had been adulterated by rampant egoism beyond all recognition. Sham, Please let us have this thread back, and take your battle elsewhere. This thread is for collectible, insightful, pithy, especially well-turned, humorous or enlightening bon mots by other Mudcatters. IF you are contemplating posting something OTHER than those, please post it in a more appropriate thread. Amos
-Joe Offer- |
Subject: RE: More Noteworthy Mudcat Quotations From: wysiwyg Date: 23 Nov 05 - 11:50 PM Amos, you trolled him into it, and now it's done.... next time, keep your whole mind on Barky's point, and not on winning your own point. ~S~ |
Subject: RE: More Noteworthy Mudcat Quotations From: The Shambles Date: 24 Nov 05 - 01:48 AM Rather good point Susan. For as Amos decided to open this thread with a personal judgement of his fellow posters - and I am not sure if was indeed rampant egoism that caused our anonymous fellow poster to close the original thread - it is possibly not really very reasonable of Amos to expect other contributors to this thread not to follow the example that he has set. |
Subject: RE: More Noteworthy Mudcat Quotations From: The Shambles Date: 24 Nov 05 - 01:50 AM I now note that Amos's opening judgement has been censored. And Susan's post to which I was replying has been deleted! -Joe Offer- |
Subject: RE: Gallery of Mudcat Quotations From: The Shambles Date: 24 Nov 05 - 02:00 AM Joe please leave my posts alone and get a life? If you had not imposed closure on the original thread Amos would have not needed to open a new one - you would have had no need to censor it and you would not have been forced to open this one again. |
Subject: RE: Gallery of Mudcat Quotations From: Joe Offer Date: 24 Nov 05 - 02:06 AM Dear Roger, As I understand it, most people don't want you cluttering up yet another thread with your anti-censorship campaign. Post what you want in this thread, and stay out of the other one. Be happy that you're tolerated as much as you are. Thank you. -Joe Offer- |
Subject: RE: Gallery of Mudcat Quotations From: John MacKenzie Date: 24 Nov 05 - 04:21 AM Shambles you are a :- Self obsessed, self interested, self important, supercilious, pompous priggish, paranoid, prat. Deluded, devoid of humour, dreadfully boring and disgustingly repetetive. No need to reply. G. |
Subject: RE: More Noteworthy Mudcat Quotations From: The Shambles Date: 24 Nov 05 - 05:15 AM Does this qualify for a 'collectible, insightful, pithy, especially well-turned, humorous or enlightening bon mot by another Mudcatter? Subject: RE: Gallery of Mudcat Quotations From: John 'Giok' MacKenzie - PM Date: 24 Nov 05 - 04:21 AM Shambles you are a :- Self obsessed, self interested, self important, supercilious, pompous priggish, paranoid, prat. Deluded, devoid of humour, dreadfully boring and disgustingly repetetive. No need to reply. G. Moved from other non-Shambles-centric thread. --JC |
Subject: RE: Gallery of Mudcat Quotations From: Don(Wyziwyg)T Date: 24 Nov 05 - 05:30 AM But he will Giok, HE WILL...........Yawn. Don T. |
Subject: RE: Gallery of Mudcat Quotations From: Amos Date: 24 Nov 05 - 09:49 AM Noteworthy Mudcat Quotations. Thanks, Joe. Appreciated. A |
Subject: RE: Gallery of Mudcat Quotations From: Peace Date: 24 Nov 05 - 10:19 AM Shambles, if you do drugs, stop. If you don't, start. |
Subject: RE: Gallery of Mudcat Quotations From: George Papavgeris Date: 30 Nov 05 - 03:37 AM |
Subject: RE: Gallery of Mudcat Quotations From: wysiwyg Date: 30 Nov 05 - 03:35 PM Subject: RE: BS: I feel like a moan..listen pls ? From: John 'Giok' MacKenzie - PM Date: 29 Nov 05 - 03:33 PM Looks like you're only going to find sympathy in the dictionary, between shit and syphilis! G. |
Share Thread: |
Subject: | Help |
From: | |
Preview Automatic Linebreaks Make a link ("blue clicky") |